剧痛与诚信:布什时代酷刑备忘录中正义战争理论的正确意图

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10436928.2023.2231833
Laura A. Sparks
{"title":"剧痛与诚信:布什时代酷刑备忘录中正义战争理论的正确意图","authors":"Laura A. Sparks","doi":"10.1080/10436928.2023.2231833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1. “Enhanced interrogation techniques” are maneuvers that “incorporate physical or psychological pressure beyond Standard Techniques” (Miles 1).2. The much-decried “Gloves Come Off” MON, in effect, continues to authorize the CIA’s (and later the Department of Defense’s) drone strikes with disturbingly little congressional oversight (Mazzetti and Apuzzo). While the drone program maintains a different orientation to human bodies—we kill people from afar, rather than up close—drone strikes are justified by disturbingly similar means.3. Also known as the Islamic State, ISIS is an offshoot of al Qaeda that emerged around 2014. The militant group quickly took over large swaths of Syria and Iraq.4. See, for example, Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Article 5 of the American Convention on Human Rights; Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights; the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions; and the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.5. Skolnick qualifies Scarry’s suggestion that torture is typically employed when “power is ‘highly contestable’ and the regime ‘unstable;’” he references the cruel treatment of IRA prisoners by British authorities in Northern Ireland as an example of torture by a stable democracy (110). Abu Ghraib provides yet another example, though perhaps the fact that these examples of torture were situated in unstable locales (i.e. Northern Ireland and Iraq, respectively) qualifies Skolnick’s point.6. Walzer in “Political Action” invokes a similar scenario to think through how political leaders make tragic decisions; he determines that a leader who decides to torture in order to save others must understand that they have done wrong and accept the moral burden of their decision.7. For ease of reference, all memos and reports are cited in Greenberg and Dratel, where they are published in their entirety.","PeriodicalId":42717,"journal":{"name":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severe Pain and Good Faith: Just War Theory’s Right Intention in the Bush-Era Torture Memos\",\"authors\":\"Laura A. Sparks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10436928.2023.2231833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1. “Enhanced interrogation techniques” are maneuvers that “incorporate physical or psychological pressure beyond Standard Techniques” (Miles 1).2. The much-decried “Gloves Come Off” MON, in effect, continues to authorize the CIA’s (and later the Department of Defense’s) drone strikes with disturbingly little congressional oversight (Mazzetti and Apuzzo). While the drone program maintains a different orientation to human bodies—we kill people from afar, rather than up close—drone strikes are justified by disturbingly similar means.3. Also known as the Islamic State, ISIS is an offshoot of al Qaeda that emerged around 2014. The militant group quickly took over large swaths of Syria and Iraq.4. See, for example, Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Article 5 of the American Convention on Human Rights; Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights; the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions; and the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.5. Skolnick qualifies Scarry’s suggestion that torture is typically employed when “power is ‘highly contestable’ and the regime ‘unstable;’” he references the cruel treatment of IRA prisoners by British authorities in Northern Ireland as an example of torture by a stable democracy (110). Abu Ghraib provides yet another example, though perhaps the fact that these examples of torture were situated in unstable locales (i.e. Northern Ireland and Iraq, respectively) qualifies Skolnick’s point.6. Walzer in “Political Action” invokes a similar scenario to think through how political leaders make tragic decisions; he determines that a leader who decides to torture in order to save others must understand that they have done wrong and accept the moral burden of their decision.7. For ease of reference, all memos and reports are cited in Greenberg and Dratel, where they are published in their entirety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2023.2231833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2023.2231833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

点击放大图片点击缩小图片披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。“强化审讯技巧”是一种“超越标准审讯技巧的生理或心理压力”的手法。备受谴责的“脱下手套”法案,实际上继续授权中央情报局(以及后来的国防部)的无人机袭击,令人不安的是,几乎没有国会的监督(马泽蒂和阿普佐)。虽然无人机项目对人体保持着不同的定位——我们从远处杀人,而不是近距离杀人,但无人机袭击的理由也令人不安地相似。ISIS也被称为伊斯兰国,是基地组织的一个分支,于2014年左右出现。这个激进组织迅速占领了叙利亚和伊拉克的大片地区。例如,见《世界人权宣言》第5条;《公民权利和政治权利国际盟约》第7条;《欧洲保护人权和基本自由公约》第3条;《美洲人权公约》第5条;《非洲人权和人民权利宪章》第5条;《日内瓦第三和第四公约》;以及《联合国禁止酷刑和其他残忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或处罚公约》。斯科尔尼克证实了斯凯瑞的说法,即酷刑通常在“权力‘高度有争议’和政权‘不稳定’时使用;”他引用了英国当局在北爱尔兰对爱尔兰共和军囚犯的残酷对待,作为稳定民主国家实施酷刑的一个例子(110)。阿布格莱布监狱提供了另一个例子,尽管这些酷刑的例子都发生在不稳定的地区(即分别是北爱尔兰和伊拉克),这可能证明了斯科尔尼克的观点。沃尔泽在《政治行动》(Political Action)中引用了一个类似的场景来思考政治领导人是如何做出悲剧性决定的;他认为,一个为了拯救他人而决定使用酷刑的领导人必须明白他们做错了,并接受他们的决定所带来的道德负担。为了方便参考,所有的备忘录和报告都在Greenberg和Dratel中引用,并在那里完整地发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Severe Pain and Good Faith: Just War Theory’s Right Intention in the Bush-Era Torture Memos
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1. “Enhanced interrogation techniques” are maneuvers that “incorporate physical or psychological pressure beyond Standard Techniques” (Miles 1).2. The much-decried “Gloves Come Off” MON, in effect, continues to authorize the CIA’s (and later the Department of Defense’s) drone strikes with disturbingly little congressional oversight (Mazzetti and Apuzzo). While the drone program maintains a different orientation to human bodies—we kill people from afar, rather than up close—drone strikes are justified by disturbingly similar means.3. Also known as the Islamic State, ISIS is an offshoot of al Qaeda that emerged around 2014. The militant group quickly took over large swaths of Syria and Iraq.4. See, for example, Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Article 5 of the American Convention on Human Rights; Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights; the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions; and the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.5. Skolnick qualifies Scarry’s suggestion that torture is typically employed when “power is ‘highly contestable’ and the regime ‘unstable;’” he references the cruel treatment of IRA prisoners by British authorities in Northern Ireland as an example of torture by a stable democracy (110). Abu Ghraib provides yet another example, though perhaps the fact that these examples of torture were situated in unstable locales (i.e. Northern Ireland and Iraq, respectively) qualifies Skolnick’s point.6. Walzer in “Political Action” invokes a similar scenario to think through how political leaders make tragic decisions; he determines that a leader who decides to torture in order to save others must understand that they have done wrong and accept the moral burden of their decision.7. For ease of reference, all memos and reports are cited in Greenberg and Dratel, where they are published in their entirety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Alex as the Product, Producer, and Consumer of Art in the Dilapidated State, in Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange Friendship and Art in Valerie Martin’s I Give It to You Reading As Conversation with the Overarching Blended Author (Or Roberto Bolaño): Joint Attention, Immersion, and Interaction The Objects of Jane Gardam The Book, Meaning, and Densities of Essential Forms in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1