对用于法医毛发分析的新手、专家和监督机器学习模型分类的评估

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1080/00450618.2023.2254337
Melissa Airlie, James Robertson, Elizabeth Brooks
{"title":"对用于法医毛发分析的新手、专家和监督机器学习模型分类的评估","authors":"Melissa Airlie, James Robertson, Elizabeth Brooks","doi":"10.1080/00450618.2023.2254337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An evaluation of forensic hair analysisbetween experts, novices and the recently developed machine learning platform, HairNet, was conducted to assess accuracy and reliability. Our hypothesis stated experts and the machine learning platform will outperform novices in classifications of hair as human or non-human and suitability for nDNA analysis based on specialist knowledge and from training of the model. Statistically significant differences between novices and experts were found and attributed to training and experience for more complex classifications. For more simplistic classifications, no statistically significant difference between the novice and the experts was found. HairNet proved responses similar to expert responses in all classifications. Encouraging feedback was received regarding the use of technology and machine learning. The utilization of technology undoubtedly holds great promise to become part of the forensic tool kit for improving the efficiency and reliability of forensic hair analysis and in research, education and competency testing.","PeriodicalId":8613,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of novice, expert and supervised machine learning model classifications for forensic hair analysis\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Airlie, James Robertson, Elizabeth Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00450618.2023.2254337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An evaluation of forensic hair analysisbetween experts, novices and the recently developed machine learning platform, HairNet, was conducted to assess accuracy and reliability. Our hypothesis stated experts and the machine learning platform will outperform novices in classifications of hair as human or non-human and suitability for nDNA analysis based on specialist knowledge and from training of the model. Statistically significant differences between novices and experts were found and attributed to training and experience for more complex classifications. For more simplistic classifications, no statistically significant difference between the novice and the experts was found. HairNet proved responses similar to expert responses in all classifications. Encouraging feedback was received regarding the use of technology and machine learning. The utilization of technology undoubtedly holds great promise to become part of the forensic tool kit for improving the efficiency and reliability of forensic hair analysis and in research, education and competency testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2023.2254337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2023.2254337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专家、新手和最近开发的机器学习平台HairNet对法医头发分析进行了评估,以评估准确性和可靠性。我们的假设表明,专家和机器学习平台将在头发分类为人类或非人类以及基于专业知识和模型训练的nDNA分析适用性方面优于新手。在统计上,新手和专家之间的显著差异被发现,并归因于更复杂分类的培训和经验。对于更简单的分类,新手和专家之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在所有分类中,HairNet证明了类似于专家的回答。关于技术和机器学习的使用收到了令人鼓舞的反馈。毫无疑问,技术的应用有望成为提高法医毛发分析效率和可靠性以及研究、教育和能力测试的法医工具包的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An evaluation of novice, expert and supervised machine learning model classifications for forensic hair analysis
An evaluation of forensic hair analysisbetween experts, novices and the recently developed machine learning platform, HairNet, was conducted to assess accuracy and reliability. Our hypothesis stated experts and the machine learning platform will outperform novices in classifications of hair as human or non-human and suitability for nDNA analysis based on specialist knowledge and from training of the model. Statistically significant differences between novices and experts were found and attributed to training and experience for more complex classifications. For more simplistic classifications, no statistically significant difference between the novice and the experts was found. HairNet proved responses similar to expert responses in all classifications. Encouraging feedback was received regarding the use of technology and machine learning. The utilization of technology undoubtedly holds great promise to become part of the forensic tool kit for improving the efficiency and reliability of forensic hair analysis and in research, education and competency testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences is the official publication of the Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences and helps the Academy meet its Objects. The Academy invites submission of review articles, research papers, commentaries, book reviews and correspondence relevant to Objects of the Academy. The Editorial policy is to attempt to represent the law, medicine and science and to promote active discussions of the relevant issues of the time as they affect the professional practice of the forensic sciences. The Journal is not restricted to contributions only from Australian authors but it will attempt to represent issues of particular relevance to Australia and its region. The meetings of the Academy normally include a plenary presentation and the Journal will seek to publish these presentations where appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Volume 56, Issue 5 Quantifying canine tissue stiffness change patterns using shear-wave elastography: implications for time of death estimation Application of discriminant function analysis and logistic regression models to estimate sex using the dimensions around the metatarsal diaphyseal nutrient foramen in the South Africans of Mixed ancestry Intracranial calcifications in Post-mortem Computed Tomography and its forensic implications Cheiloscopy in population affinity estimation: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1