SureTectTM与表型法和基因型法检测即食食品中沙门氏菌和单核增生李斯特菌的比较

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Korean Journal of Food Preservation Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.11002/kjfp.2023.30.2.262
Kye-Hwan Byun, Byoung Hu Kim, Ah Jin Cho, Eun Her, Sunghee Yoon, Taeik Kim, Sang-Do Ha
{"title":"SureTectTM与表型法和基因型法检测即食食品中沙门氏菌和单核增生李斯特菌的比较","authors":"Kye-Hwan Byun, Byoung Hu Kim, Ah Jin Cho, Eun Her, Sunghee Yoon, Taeik Kim, Sang-Do Ha","doi":"10.11002/kjfp.2023.30.2.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to compare and assess the effectiveness of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and the selective agar plate method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods. In RTE foods, the detection performance of the three methods (RT-PCR [SureTectTM kit and PowerChekTM kit], LAMP [3M MDS], selective agar) were similar at 0-10, 10-50, 50-100, and 100- CFU/mL of Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes. We found that with RT-PCR, the Ct value of salad was significantly higher (p<0.05) than other RTE foods, indicating that fiber plays a critical role as an obstacle to the rapid detection of Salmonella spp. However, the Ct value displayed a mixed pattern according to the inoculation level of L. monocytogenes. The use of rapid detection kits and machines mostly depends on the user’s choice, with accuracy, ease of use, and economy being the primary considerations. As an RT-PCR kit, SureTectTM and PowerChekTM showed high accuracy in detecting Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in RTE foods, showing that they can replace the existing RT-PCR kits available. Additionally, LAMP also showed excellent detection performance, suggesting that it has the potential to be used as a food safety management tool.","PeriodicalId":17875,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of SureTectTM with phenotypic and genotypic method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods\",\"authors\":\"Kye-Hwan Byun, Byoung Hu Kim, Ah Jin Cho, Eun Her, Sunghee Yoon, Taeik Kim, Sang-Do Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.11002/kjfp.2023.30.2.262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to compare and assess the effectiveness of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and the selective agar plate method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods. In RTE foods, the detection performance of the three methods (RT-PCR [SureTectTM kit and PowerChekTM kit], LAMP [3M MDS], selective agar) were similar at 0-10, 10-50, 50-100, and 100- CFU/mL of Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes. We found that with RT-PCR, the Ct value of salad was significantly higher (p<0.05) than other RTE foods, indicating that fiber plays a critical role as an obstacle to the rapid detection of Salmonella spp. However, the Ct value displayed a mixed pattern according to the inoculation level of L. monocytogenes. The use of rapid detection kits and machines mostly depends on the user’s choice, with accuracy, ease of use, and economy being the primary considerations. As an RT-PCR kit, SureTectTM and PowerChekTM showed high accuracy in detecting Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in RTE foods, showing that they can replace the existing RT-PCR kits available. Additionally, LAMP also showed excellent detection performance, suggesting that it has the potential to be used as a food safety management tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Food Preservation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Food Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2023.30.2.262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2023.30.2.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较和评估实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)、环介导等温扩增(LAMP)和选择性琼脂平板法检测即食食品中沙门氏菌和单核增生李斯特菌的有效性。在RTE食品中,三种方法(RT-PCR [SureTectTM试剂盒和PowerChekTM试剂盒]、LAMP [3M MDS]、选择性琼脂)对沙门氏菌和单核增生乳杆菌在0-10、10-50、50-100和100- CFU/mL的检测效果相似。我们通过RT-PCR发现,沙拉的Ct值显著高于其他RTE食品(p<0.05),说明纤维对沙门氏菌的快速检测起着关键的阻碍作用,但随着单增乳杆菌接种量的不同,Ct值呈现混合模式。快速检测试剂盒和机器的使用主要取决于用户的选择,准确性,易用性和经济性是主要考虑因素。作为RT-PCR试剂盒,SureTectTM和PowerChekTM对RTE食品中沙门氏菌和单核增生乳杆菌的检测具有较高的准确性,可以替代现有的RT-PCR试剂盒。此外,LAMP还显示出优异的检测性能,表明它具有作为食品安全管理工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of SureTectTM with phenotypic and genotypic method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods
The objective of this study is to compare and assess the effectiveness of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and the selective agar plate method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods. In RTE foods, the detection performance of the three methods (RT-PCR [SureTectTM kit and PowerChekTM kit], LAMP [3M MDS], selective agar) were similar at 0-10, 10-50, 50-100, and 100- CFU/mL of Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes. We found that with RT-PCR, the Ct value of salad was significantly higher (p<0.05) than other RTE foods, indicating that fiber plays a critical role as an obstacle to the rapid detection of Salmonella spp. However, the Ct value displayed a mixed pattern according to the inoculation level of L. monocytogenes. The use of rapid detection kits and machines mostly depends on the user’s choice, with accuracy, ease of use, and economy being the primary considerations. As an RT-PCR kit, SureTectTM and PowerChekTM showed high accuracy in detecting Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in RTE foods, showing that they can replace the existing RT-PCR kits available. Additionally, LAMP also showed excellent detection performance, suggesting that it has the potential to be used as a food safety management tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Food Preservation
Korean Journal of Food Preservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote and encourage the advancement of quantitative improvement for the storage, processing and distribution of food and its related disciplines, theory and research on its application. Topics covered include: Food Preservation and Packaging Food and Food Material distribution Fresh-cut Food Manufacturing Food processing Technology Food Functional Properties Food Quality / Safety.
期刊最新文献
Effect of gamma irradiation on post-harvest quality of king oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii) Effectiveness of controlled atmosphere container on the freshness of exported PMRsupia melon Effects of impact by mechanical harvesting on storability of onions (Allium cepa L.) Evaluation of physicochemical and biological properties of python fat (Python bivittatus) Efficacy of Elaeagnus umbellata leaves on prevention of cadmium-induced toxicity in HepG2 cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1