观察性研究作为将创新肿瘤学方法引入临床实践的工具:综述

Igor E. Khatkov, Irina I. Andreyashkina, Kristina A. Anichkina, Alina V. Pasternak, Elizaveta S. Prokofieva, Roman D. Zaitsev, Ivan D. Trotsenko
{"title":"观察性研究作为将创新肿瘤学方法引入临床实践的工具:综述","authors":"Igor E. Khatkov, Irina I. Andreyashkina, Kristina A. Anichkina, Alina V. Pasternak, Elizaveta S. Prokofieva, Roman D. Zaitsev, Ivan D. Trotsenko","doi":"10.26442/20751753.2023.6.202351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard of evidence-based medicine. However, it is no less evident that real practice presents many new and important questions that are difficult to answer in the RCT. To what extent does the real patient meet the criteria for inclusion in the study? What are the efficacy and safety of the drug in comorbid and elderly patients? How deviations from the treatment regimen affect safety, etc. The introduction of innovative oncology approaches is disproportionately faster than in other fields. That is why a balanced analysis of the effects of innovation in real-world practice is relevant. Regulatory authorities are aware of this and demonstrate a willingness to consider and actively support real-world evidence research as part of drug applications, which is a powerful incentive for developing this area. The purpose of the article is to analyze the regulatory approaches in the United States and Europe to real-world studies when considering drug applications and to discuss the experience of organizing an observational study of the effectiveness of individual drugs for the treatment of oncological diseases in Moscow as a unique example of interaction between regulatory authorities and the expert community of oncologists.","PeriodicalId":10550,"journal":{"name":"Consilium Medicum","volume":"5 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational studies as a tool for introducing innovative oncology approaches into clinical practice: A review\",\"authors\":\"Igor E. Khatkov, Irina I. Andreyashkina, Kristina A. Anichkina, Alina V. Pasternak, Elizaveta S. Prokofieva, Roman D. Zaitsev, Ivan D. Trotsenko\",\"doi\":\"10.26442/20751753.2023.6.202351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard of evidence-based medicine. However, it is no less evident that real practice presents many new and important questions that are difficult to answer in the RCT. To what extent does the real patient meet the criteria for inclusion in the study? What are the efficacy and safety of the drug in comorbid and elderly patients? How deviations from the treatment regimen affect safety, etc. The introduction of innovative oncology approaches is disproportionately faster than in other fields. That is why a balanced analysis of the effects of innovation in real-world practice is relevant. Regulatory authorities are aware of this and demonstrate a willingness to consider and actively support real-world evidence research as part of drug applications, which is a powerful incentive for developing this area. The purpose of the article is to analyze the regulatory approaches in the United States and Europe to real-world studies when considering drug applications and to discuss the experience of organizing an observational study of the effectiveness of individual drugs for the treatment of oncological diseases in Moscow as a unique example of interaction between regulatory authorities and the expert community of oncologists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consilium Medicum\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consilium Medicum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2023.6.202351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consilium Medicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2023.6.202351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随机临床试验(RCTs)是循证医学的黄金标准。然而,同样明显的是,实际实践提出了许多新的和重要的问题,这些问题在随机对照试验中很难回答。真实患者在多大程度上符合纳入研究的标准?该药对合并症和老年患者的疗效和安全性如何?偏离治疗方案如何影响安全性等。创新肿瘤学方法的引入比其他领域要快得多。这就是为什么对创新在现实世界实践中的影响进行平衡分析是相关的。监管机构意识到了这一点,并表示愿意考虑并积极支持现实证据研究作为药物应用的一部分,这是发展这一领域的强大动力。本文的目的是分析美国和欧洲在考虑药物应用时对现实世界研究的监管方法,并讨论在莫斯科组织一项观察性研究,研究治疗肿瘤疾病的单个药物的有效性,作为监管当局与肿瘤学专家社区之间相互作用的独特例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observational studies as a tool for introducing innovative oncology approaches into clinical practice: A review
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard of evidence-based medicine. However, it is no less evident that real practice presents many new and important questions that are difficult to answer in the RCT. To what extent does the real patient meet the criteria for inclusion in the study? What are the efficacy and safety of the drug in comorbid and elderly patients? How deviations from the treatment regimen affect safety, etc. The introduction of innovative oncology approaches is disproportionately faster than in other fields. That is why a balanced analysis of the effects of innovation in real-world practice is relevant. Regulatory authorities are aware of this and demonstrate a willingness to consider and actively support real-world evidence research as part of drug applications, which is a powerful incentive for developing this area. The purpose of the article is to analyze the regulatory approaches in the United States and Europe to real-world studies when considering drug applications and to discuss the experience of organizing an observational study of the effectiveness of individual drugs for the treatment of oncological diseases in Moscow as a unique example of interaction between regulatory authorities and the expert community of oncologists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Possibilities of noninvasive diagnostics of cardiovascular diseases associated with atherosclerosis Clinical case of mechanical and non-mechanical rhabdomyolysis complicated by acute kidney injury. Case report Hyperuricemia and acute decompensation of heart failure: is there a causative link? A review Extralobar pulmonary sequestration in an adult male with a heart defect. Case report Atherosclerosis and inflammation: Current therapeutic strategies. A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1