混合入路治疗髂股动脉广泛性闭塞性疾病

Mehmet Cahit Saricaoglu, Evren Ozcinar
{"title":"混合入路治疗髂股动脉广泛性闭塞性疾病","authors":"Mehmet Cahit Saricaoglu, Evren Ozcinar","doi":"10.9739/tjvs.2023.08.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Simultaneous multilevel hybrid-based reconstructions using both endovascular and open femoral endartectomy merit the interest with the widespread adoption of these techniques by vascular surgeons. Here we presented our experience on hybrid-based approach to treat total occlusive iliofemoral lesions and study the technical success and mid-term results of combined femoral endarterectomy and endovascular treatment of iliac occlusion. Material and Methods: This retrospective single center study included patients with only total occlusion in the unilateral iliac artery. The patients underwent hybrid procedure–open femoral endarterectomy and endovascular revascularization of the external or common iliac artery- between 2016 and 2022. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software version 25. Results: Totally 103 patients who underwent hybrid procedures for pervasive unilateral iliac artery occlusions were included in this study. Of the study cohort, 76% were male patients with a mean age of 74±8.7 years. Technical success rate was 89.3%. Acute myocardial infarction was the most common complication. The 30-day mortality was 7.8% (n=8) and all of them were in-hospital deaths. The survival rates of this cohort at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months were 92.2%, 88.1% and 83.7%, respectively. The primary patency at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months were 98.1%, 96.6%, and 93.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The clinical and technical outcomes in this study suggest that the hybrid approach to pervasive iliofemoral occlusions, combining femoral endarterectomy and endovascular iliac revascularization, is an effective and applicable treatment in terms of patency rates and perioperative complications.","PeriodicalId":23982,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid-based approach for pervasive occlusive disease of iliofemoral arteries\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Cahit Saricaoglu, Evren Ozcinar\",\"doi\":\"10.9739/tjvs.2023.08.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Simultaneous multilevel hybrid-based reconstructions using both endovascular and open femoral endartectomy merit the interest with the widespread adoption of these techniques by vascular surgeons. Here we presented our experience on hybrid-based approach to treat total occlusive iliofemoral lesions and study the technical success and mid-term results of combined femoral endarterectomy and endovascular treatment of iliac occlusion. Material and Methods: This retrospective single center study included patients with only total occlusion in the unilateral iliac artery. The patients underwent hybrid procedure–open femoral endarterectomy and endovascular revascularization of the external or common iliac artery- between 2016 and 2022. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software version 25. Results: Totally 103 patients who underwent hybrid procedures for pervasive unilateral iliac artery occlusions were included in this study. Of the study cohort, 76% were male patients with a mean age of 74±8.7 years. Technical success rate was 89.3%. Acute myocardial infarction was the most common complication. The 30-day mortality was 7.8% (n=8) and all of them were in-hospital deaths. The survival rates of this cohort at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months were 92.2%, 88.1% and 83.7%, respectively. The primary patency at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months were 98.1%, 96.6%, and 93.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The clinical and technical outcomes in this study suggest that the hybrid approach to pervasive iliofemoral occlusions, combining femoral endarterectomy and endovascular iliac revascularization, is an effective and applicable treatment in terms of patency rates and perioperative complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2023.08.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2023.08.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着血管外科医生广泛采用血管内切除术和开放股动脉内切除术同时进行多节段混合重建,值得关注。在此,我们介绍了混合入路治疗髂股全闭塞病变的经验,并研究了联合股动脉内膜切除术和血管内治疗髂闭塞的技术成功和中期结果。材料和方法:本回顾性单中心研究纳入仅单侧髂动脉完全闭塞的患者。这些患者在2016年至2022年期间接受了开放式股动脉内膜切除术和髂外动脉或髂总动脉血管内重建术的混合手术。采用SPSS软件25版进行统计分析。结果:本研究共纳入103例采用混合手术治疗广泛性单侧髂动脉闭塞的患者。在研究队列中,76%为男性患者,平均年龄为74±8.7岁。技术成功率89.3%。急性心肌梗死是最常见的并发症。30天死亡率为7.8% (n=8),均为院内死亡。30天、6个月和12个月生存率分别为92.2%、88.1%和83.7%。30天、6个月、12个月原发性通畅率分别为98.1%、96.6%、93.7%。结论:本研究的临床和技术结果表明,联合股动脉内膜切除术和血管内髂血管重建术治疗广泛性髂股动脉闭塞在通畅率和围手术期并发症方面是一种有效和适用的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybrid-based approach for pervasive occlusive disease of iliofemoral arteries
Aim: Simultaneous multilevel hybrid-based reconstructions using both endovascular and open femoral endartectomy merit the interest with the widespread adoption of these techniques by vascular surgeons. Here we presented our experience on hybrid-based approach to treat total occlusive iliofemoral lesions and study the technical success and mid-term results of combined femoral endarterectomy and endovascular treatment of iliac occlusion. Material and Methods: This retrospective single center study included patients with only total occlusion in the unilateral iliac artery. The patients underwent hybrid procedure–open femoral endarterectomy and endovascular revascularization of the external or common iliac artery- between 2016 and 2022. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software version 25. Results: Totally 103 patients who underwent hybrid procedures for pervasive unilateral iliac artery occlusions were included in this study. Of the study cohort, 76% were male patients with a mean age of 74±8.7 years. Technical success rate was 89.3%. Acute myocardial infarction was the most common complication. The 30-day mortality was 7.8% (n=8) and all of them were in-hospital deaths. The survival rates of this cohort at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months were 92.2%, 88.1% and 83.7%, respectively. The primary patency at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months were 98.1%, 96.6%, and 93.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The clinical and technical outcomes in this study suggest that the hybrid approach to pervasive iliofemoral occlusions, combining femoral endarterectomy and endovascular iliac revascularization, is an effective and applicable treatment in terms of patency rates and perioperative complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undesirable complication after transradial coronary angiography: A case report The factors influencing compliance in post-EVAR surveillance regarding the perspectives of practitioners and patients Risk factors for chronic venous insufficiency in nurses in Türkiye - NueVo TR Investigation of factors affecting reintervention after type A aortic dissection Carotid-subclavian bypass in the treatment of subclavian artery occlusion during epidermoid cyst excision: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1