使用机器学习评估预测桥梁状态的准确性:状态历史的作用

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structure and Infrastructure Engineering Pub Date : 2023-11-05 DOI:10.1080/15732479.2023.2274878
Parham Paydavosi, Mohammad Saied Dehghani, Sue McNeil
{"title":"使用机器学习评估预测桥梁状态的准确性:状态历史的作用","authors":"Parham Paydavosi, Mohammad Saied Dehghani, Sue McNeil","doi":"10.1080/15732479.2023.2274878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractEffective maintenance decisions for bridges depend on accurate performance prediction. Machine learning (ML) models use historical bridge performance data to learn and predict performance. However, in many agencies, the condition history of bridges is limited and does not go beyond a few years. The question, therefore, is, to what extent does condition history help us make better predictions? To address this question, a ML model was developed that analysed more than 600,000 bridge decks with 27 years of condition history. Two data selection methods were designed: non-overlapping and overlapping data. The non-overlapping data are typically used to train the model. The overlapping data introduced in this study uses the data more efficiently for model training recognising that strings of historical data convey more information. Longer term predictions were found to be positively impacted by every additional year of condition history. Short-term condition prediction (one or two years) does not need significant historical data. It was also found that overlapping data, compared to non-overlapping data, produced larger training samples and had higher prediction accuracy in the majority of experiments, but at the cost of higher running time due to a larger sample size.Keywords: Artificial intelligencebig datainfrastructure asset managementmachine learningbridge structure deteriorationbridge conditionneural networkperformance prediction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":49468,"journal":{"name":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the accuracy of predicted bridge condition using machine learning: the role of condition history\",\"authors\":\"Parham Paydavosi, Mohammad Saied Dehghani, Sue McNeil\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15732479.2023.2274878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractEffective maintenance decisions for bridges depend on accurate performance prediction. Machine learning (ML) models use historical bridge performance data to learn and predict performance. However, in many agencies, the condition history of bridges is limited and does not go beyond a few years. The question, therefore, is, to what extent does condition history help us make better predictions? To address this question, a ML model was developed that analysed more than 600,000 bridge decks with 27 years of condition history. Two data selection methods were designed: non-overlapping and overlapping data. The non-overlapping data are typically used to train the model. The overlapping data introduced in this study uses the data more efficiently for model training recognising that strings of historical data convey more information. Longer term predictions were found to be positively impacted by every additional year of condition history. Short-term condition prediction (one or two years) does not need significant historical data. It was also found that overlapping data, compared to non-overlapping data, produced larger training samples and had higher prediction accuracy in the majority of experiments, but at the cost of higher running time due to a larger sample size.Keywords: Artificial intelligencebig datainfrastructure asset managementmachine learningbridge structure deteriorationbridge conditionneural networkperformance prediction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":49468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2274878\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2274878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要有效的桥梁维护决策依赖于准确的性能预测。机器学习(ML)模型使用历史桥梁性能数据来学习和预测性能。然而,在许多机构中,桥梁的状态历史是有限的,不超过几年。因此,问题是,条件历史在多大程度上帮助我们做出更好的预测?为了解决这个问题,开发了一个ML模型,分析了超过60万层具有27年状态历史的桥面。设计了两种数据选择方法:非重叠和重叠数据。非重叠数据通常用于训练模型。本研究中引入的重叠数据更有效地使用数据进行模型训练,识别历史数据字符串传递更多信息。研究发现,每增加一年的病情历史,长期预测就会受到积极影响。短期情况预测(一到两年)不需要重要的历史数据。研究还发现,与非重叠数据相比,重叠数据在大多数实验中产生的训练样本更大,预测精度更高,但由于样本量更大,运行时间也更长。关键词:人工智能大数据基础设施资产管理机器学习桥梁结构恶化桥梁状况神经网络性能预测披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the accuracy of predicted bridge condition using machine learning: the role of condition history
AbstractEffective maintenance decisions for bridges depend on accurate performance prediction. Machine learning (ML) models use historical bridge performance data to learn and predict performance. However, in many agencies, the condition history of bridges is limited and does not go beyond a few years. The question, therefore, is, to what extent does condition history help us make better predictions? To address this question, a ML model was developed that analysed more than 600,000 bridge decks with 27 years of condition history. Two data selection methods were designed: non-overlapping and overlapping data. The non-overlapping data are typically used to train the model. The overlapping data introduced in this study uses the data more efficiently for model training recognising that strings of historical data convey more information. Longer term predictions were found to be positively impacted by every additional year of condition history. Short-term condition prediction (one or two years) does not need significant historical data. It was also found that overlapping data, compared to non-overlapping data, produced larger training samples and had higher prediction accuracy in the majority of experiments, but at the cost of higher running time due to a larger sample size.Keywords: Artificial intelligencebig datainfrastructure asset managementmachine learningbridge structure deteriorationbridge conditionneural networkperformance prediction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
131
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Structure and Infrastructure Engineering - Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance is an international Journal dedicated to recent advances in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of a wide range of infrastructures, such as: buildings, bridges, dams, railways, underground constructions, offshore platforms, pipelines, naval vessels, ocean structures, nuclear power plants, airplanes and other types of structures including aerospace and automotive structures. The Journal presents research and developments on the most advanced technologies for analyzing, predicting and optimizing infrastructure performance. The main gaps to be filled are those between researchers and practitioners in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of infrastructure systems, and those between professionals working on different types of infrastructures. To this end, the journal will provide a forum for a broad blend of scientific, technical and practical papers. The journal is endorsed by the International Association for Life-Cycle Civil Engineering ( IALCCE) and the International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety ( IABMAS).
期刊最新文献
Vibration based dual-criteria damage detection method using deep neural networks in highway bridges with steel girders Numerical study on flexural behaviour of sulphate corroded RC beams strengthened with ultra-high-performance concrete A boosted deep learning-based approach for near real-time response estimation of structures under ground motion excitations Structural frequency-based maintenance management method for steel truss bridges under atmospheric corrosion Investigation of the time-dependent bearing capacities of concrete structures in different environments considering climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1