{"title":"建立还是毁灭这个国家?这反映了莫伊总统的政权","authors":"Fred Nasubo","doi":"10.1080/14608944.2023.2277243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study explores Kenya’s second President, Daniel Arap Moi’s attempts to establish a sense of a shared national identity. Content analysis of books written about him, his speeches, and newspaper articles reveals how Moi used Nyayo philosophy, national holidays, the Father of the Nation narrative, currency notes and coins, and monuments to foster a Kenyan national identity. Despite efforts to forge a common national identity, the government frequently operated in a way that was at odds with what Moi said in his speeches. Whereas President Moi advocated for peace, love, and unity, his administration was largely characterised by clientelism, patronism, social and regional inequalities, and interethnic violence, among other social, economic and political evils. Because of the disconnect between what Moi claimed and what his administration actually did, his attempts to foster nationhood could alternatively be seen as a way for him to control the state, consolidate power, and legitimize his leadership. Therefore, during Moi’s rule, national identity building lacked a strong collective consciousness, which would have enabled Kenyans to institutionalise a sense of belonging and attachment to the nation.KEYWORDS: Countrycivic identityethnic identitynational identitynation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementAll data used in this work has been referenced accordingly.Additional informationNotes on contributorsFred NasuboDr. Fred Nasubo researches, writes and teaches with a particular interest in identity politics, citizenship, nation branding and governance. He is a lecturer at Taita Taveta University and Research Fellow at the British Institute in Eastern Africa. Nasubo holds a PhD in Governance and Regional Integration from Pan African University, Institute of Governance, Humanities and Social Sciences-Yaoundé Cameroon, and a Masters of Arts in History, and BA in History & Economics from Egerton University-Kenya.","PeriodicalId":45917,"journal":{"name":"NATIONAL IDENTITIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making or unmaking the nation? A reflection of president Moi’s regime\",\"authors\":\"Fred Nasubo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14608944.2023.2277243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis study explores Kenya’s second President, Daniel Arap Moi’s attempts to establish a sense of a shared national identity. Content analysis of books written about him, his speeches, and newspaper articles reveals how Moi used Nyayo philosophy, national holidays, the Father of the Nation narrative, currency notes and coins, and monuments to foster a Kenyan national identity. Despite efforts to forge a common national identity, the government frequently operated in a way that was at odds with what Moi said in his speeches. Whereas President Moi advocated for peace, love, and unity, his administration was largely characterised by clientelism, patronism, social and regional inequalities, and interethnic violence, among other social, economic and political evils. Because of the disconnect between what Moi claimed and what his administration actually did, his attempts to foster nationhood could alternatively be seen as a way for him to control the state, consolidate power, and legitimize his leadership. Therefore, during Moi’s rule, national identity building lacked a strong collective consciousness, which would have enabled Kenyans to institutionalise a sense of belonging and attachment to the nation.KEYWORDS: Countrycivic identityethnic identitynational identitynation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementAll data used in this work has been referenced accordingly.Additional informationNotes on contributorsFred NasuboDr. Fred Nasubo researches, writes and teaches with a particular interest in identity politics, citizenship, nation branding and governance. He is a lecturer at Taita Taveta University and Research Fellow at the British Institute in Eastern Africa. Nasubo holds a PhD in Governance and Regional Integration from Pan African University, Institute of Governance, Humanities and Social Sciences-Yaoundé Cameroon, and a Masters of Arts in History, and BA in History & Economics from Egerton University-Kenya.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NATIONAL IDENTITIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NATIONAL IDENTITIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2023.2277243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NATIONAL IDENTITIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2023.2277243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Making or unmaking the nation? A reflection of president Moi’s regime
ABSTRACTThis study explores Kenya’s second President, Daniel Arap Moi’s attempts to establish a sense of a shared national identity. Content analysis of books written about him, his speeches, and newspaper articles reveals how Moi used Nyayo philosophy, national holidays, the Father of the Nation narrative, currency notes and coins, and monuments to foster a Kenyan national identity. Despite efforts to forge a common national identity, the government frequently operated in a way that was at odds with what Moi said in his speeches. Whereas President Moi advocated for peace, love, and unity, his administration was largely characterised by clientelism, patronism, social and regional inequalities, and interethnic violence, among other social, economic and political evils. Because of the disconnect between what Moi claimed and what his administration actually did, his attempts to foster nationhood could alternatively be seen as a way for him to control the state, consolidate power, and legitimize his leadership. Therefore, during Moi’s rule, national identity building lacked a strong collective consciousness, which would have enabled Kenyans to institutionalise a sense of belonging and attachment to the nation.KEYWORDS: Countrycivic identityethnic identitynational identitynation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementAll data used in this work has been referenced accordingly.Additional informationNotes on contributorsFred NasuboDr. Fred Nasubo researches, writes and teaches with a particular interest in identity politics, citizenship, nation branding and governance. He is a lecturer at Taita Taveta University and Research Fellow at the British Institute in Eastern Africa. Nasubo holds a PhD in Governance and Regional Integration from Pan African University, Institute of Governance, Humanities and Social Sciences-Yaoundé Cameroon, and a Masters of Arts in History, and BA in History & Economics from Egerton University-Kenya.
期刊介绍:
National Identities explores the formation and expression of national identity from antiquity to the present day. It examines the role in forging identity of cultural (language, architecture, music, gender, religion, the media, sport, encounters with "the other" etc.) and political (state forms, wars, boundaries) factors, by examining how these have been shaped and changed over time. The historical significance of "nation"in political and cultural terms is considered in relationship to other important and in some cases countervailing forms of identity such as religion, region, tribe or class. The focus is on identity, rather than on contingent political forms that may express it. The journal is not prescriptive or proscriptive in its approach.