基于机器学习的相预测和粉末冶金辅助中熵成分复杂合金的实验验证

IF 1.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1088/1361-651x/ad04f4
Priyabrata Das, Pulak Mohan Pandey
{"title":"基于机器学习的相预测和粉末冶金辅助中熵成分复杂合金的实验验证","authors":"Priyabrata Das, Pulak Mohan Pandey","doi":"10.1088/1361-651x/ad04f4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Medium entropy alloys (MEAs) are a subset of compositionally complex alloys (CCAs) whose mixing entropy lies between R and 1.5R where R is the universal gas constant. The properties of MEAs largely depend on the phases present in the alloy such as solid solution (SS), solid solution + intermetallic (SS+IM) and amorphous (AM). Hence, the correct prediction of phases can enable the efficient selection of material compositions with anticipated properties. In this paper, three ML algorithms viz. k-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest (RF) were employed for the ternary phase classification problem. An MEA dataset was constructed by utilizing all reported MEAs till February 2023 to the best of authors’ knowledge. The study implied that the use of only three features (mixing enthalpy, atomic size mismatch, and a strain energy related parameter) were sufficient for the phase prediction in MEAs. Among the three ML algorithms, ANN had the highest macro averaged F1 score (86.7%) and accuracy (87.3%) in predicting the phases in MEAs, while RF has the lowest macro F1 score (84.67%) and accuracy (84.8%). However, for phase prediction between single phase SS and multi-phase SS (binary classification), distance-based algorithm (KNN) was found to be suitable. The prediction performance of ML model over a completely unseen data was assessed in the case study section. The experimentally determined phase details of three new MEA compositions fabricated by powder metallurgy route was also included in the unseen dataset. The SS and AM phases were correctly labeled nine times out of eleven instances by using ANN model. However, the model prediction for SS+IM phase was found to be less reliable (three out of five correct) owing to its relatively poor F1 score.","PeriodicalId":18648,"journal":{"name":"Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning based phase prediction and powder metallurgy assisted experimental validation of medium entropy compositionally complex alloys\",\"authors\":\"Priyabrata Das, Pulak Mohan Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-651x/ad04f4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Medium entropy alloys (MEAs) are a subset of compositionally complex alloys (CCAs) whose mixing entropy lies between R and 1.5R where R is the universal gas constant. The properties of MEAs largely depend on the phases present in the alloy such as solid solution (SS), solid solution + intermetallic (SS+IM) and amorphous (AM). Hence, the correct prediction of phases can enable the efficient selection of material compositions with anticipated properties. In this paper, three ML algorithms viz. k-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest (RF) were employed for the ternary phase classification problem. An MEA dataset was constructed by utilizing all reported MEAs till February 2023 to the best of authors’ knowledge. The study implied that the use of only three features (mixing enthalpy, atomic size mismatch, and a strain energy related parameter) were sufficient for the phase prediction in MEAs. Among the three ML algorithms, ANN had the highest macro averaged F1 score (86.7%) and accuracy (87.3%) in predicting the phases in MEAs, while RF has the lowest macro F1 score (84.67%) and accuracy (84.8%). However, for phase prediction between single phase SS and multi-phase SS (binary classification), distance-based algorithm (KNN) was found to be suitable. The prediction performance of ML model over a completely unseen data was assessed in the case study section. The experimentally determined phase details of three new MEA compositions fabricated by powder metallurgy route was also included in the unseen dataset. The SS and AM phases were correctly labeled nine times out of eleven instances by using ANN model. However, the model prediction for SS+IM phase was found to be less reliable (three out of five correct) owing to its relatively poor F1 score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/ad04f4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/ad04f4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中熵合金(MEAs)是成分复杂合金(CCAs)的一个子集,其混合熵介于R ~ 1.5R之间,其中R为通用气体常数。MEAs的性能在很大程度上取决于合金中存在的固溶体(SS)、固溶体+金属间化合物(SS+IM)和非晶(AM)相。因此,正确的相预测可以有效地选择具有预期性能的材料成分。本文采用k近邻(KNN)、人工神经网络(ANN)和随机森林(RF)三种机器学习算法来解决三相分类问题。利用作者所知的截至2023年2月的所有已报道的MEA数据集构建了MEA数据集。研究表明,仅使用三个特征(混合焓、原子尺寸失配和应变能相关参数)就足以进行MEAs中的相位预测。在3种ML算法中,ANN的宏观平均F1分数(86.7%)和准确率(87.3%)最高,而RF的宏观平均F1分数(84.67%)和准确率(84.8%)最低。然而,对于单相SS和多相SS(二值分类)之间的相位预测,发现基于距离的算法(KNN)是合适的。在案例研究部分中评估了ML模型对完全看不见的数据的预测性能。通过粉末冶金方法制备的三种新型MEA组合物的实验测定相细节也包含在未见数据集中。使用人工神经网络模型对11个实例中的9个进行了正确标记。然而,由于其F1评分相对较低,SS+IM期的模型预测可靠性较差(五分之三正确)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning based phase prediction and powder metallurgy assisted experimental validation of medium entropy compositionally complex alloys
Abstract Medium entropy alloys (MEAs) are a subset of compositionally complex alloys (CCAs) whose mixing entropy lies between R and 1.5R where R is the universal gas constant. The properties of MEAs largely depend on the phases present in the alloy such as solid solution (SS), solid solution + intermetallic (SS+IM) and amorphous (AM). Hence, the correct prediction of phases can enable the efficient selection of material compositions with anticipated properties. In this paper, three ML algorithms viz. k-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest (RF) were employed for the ternary phase classification problem. An MEA dataset was constructed by utilizing all reported MEAs till February 2023 to the best of authors’ knowledge. The study implied that the use of only three features (mixing enthalpy, atomic size mismatch, and a strain energy related parameter) were sufficient for the phase prediction in MEAs. Among the three ML algorithms, ANN had the highest macro averaged F1 score (86.7%) and accuracy (87.3%) in predicting the phases in MEAs, while RF has the lowest macro F1 score (84.67%) and accuracy (84.8%). However, for phase prediction between single phase SS and multi-phase SS (binary classification), distance-based algorithm (KNN) was found to be suitable. The prediction performance of ML model over a completely unseen data was assessed in the case study section. The experimentally determined phase details of three new MEA compositions fabricated by powder metallurgy route was also included in the unseen dataset. The SS and AM phases were correctly labeled nine times out of eleven instances by using ANN model. However, the model prediction for SS+IM phase was found to be less reliable (three out of five correct) owing to its relatively poor F1 score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Serving the multidisciplinary materials community, the journal aims to publish new research work that advances the understanding and prediction of material behaviour at scales from atomistic to macroscopic through modelling and simulation. Subject coverage: Modelling and/or simulation across materials science that emphasizes fundamental materials issues advancing the understanding and prediction of material behaviour. Interdisciplinary research that tackles challenging and complex materials problems where the governing phenomena may span different scales of materials behaviour, with an emphasis on the development of quantitative approaches to explain and predict experimental observations. Material processing that advances the fundamental materials science and engineering underpinning the connection between processing and properties. Covering all classes of materials, and mechanical, microstructural, electronic, chemical, biological, and optical properties.
期刊最新文献
Plastic deformation mechanism of γ phase Fe–Cr alloy revealed by molecular dynamics simulations A nonlinear phase-field model of corrosion with charging kinetics of electric double layer Effect of helium bubbles on the mobility of edge dislocations in copper Mechanical-electric-magnetic-thermal coupled enriched finite element method for magneto-electro-elastic structures Molecular dynamics simulations of high-energy radiation damage in hcp-titanium considering electronic effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1