Xiaosheng Xu, Chentao Li, Tianyao Ji, Mengshi Li, Qinghua Wu
{"title":"电力供热一体化系统随机多目标调度决策","authors":"Xiaosheng Xu, Chentao Li, Tianyao Ji, Mengshi Li, Qinghua Wu","doi":"10.1063/5.0175636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the realm of modern energy systems, addressing the challenges of enhancing flexibility and efficiency under uncertain conditions is of paramount importance. This paper explores the stochastic multi-objective optimal multi-energy flow problem within the context of integrated electrical and heating systems (IEHS). First, the electrical network, the heating network, and the energy hubs were modeled in a completely linearized form. The linear weighted sum method with variable weights was used to transform the multi-objective problem into a single-objective problem and generate a large number of Pareto-optimal solutions. Second, the input stochastic variables were divided into multi-interval scenarios by employing the Cartesian product. For each interval scenario, the interval satisfaction degree level was proposed to convert the constraints involving interval numbers into deterministic ones. Third, a multiple attributes decision analysis (MADA) approach was proposed based on evidential reasoning theory. Six evaluation attributes, namely, the power purchase cost and pollution gas emissions of IEHS, the sum of power loss and sum of voltage deviation in the electrical system, the sum of temperature drop in the heating system, and the interval probability value of the multi-interval scenarios, were considered to rank the Pareto-optimal solutions collected from the multi-interval scenarios and determine the final dispatch solution (called the Utopia solution). Numerical simulations demonstrated that the Utopia solution can comprehensively evaluate various attributes, making it the most suitable option for meeting the operational requirements of IEHS.","PeriodicalId":16953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making for stochastic multi-objective dispatch of integrated electrical and heating systems\",\"authors\":\"Xiaosheng Xu, Chentao Li, Tianyao Ji, Mengshi Li, Qinghua Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0175636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the realm of modern energy systems, addressing the challenges of enhancing flexibility and efficiency under uncertain conditions is of paramount importance. This paper explores the stochastic multi-objective optimal multi-energy flow problem within the context of integrated electrical and heating systems (IEHS). First, the electrical network, the heating network, and the energy hubs were modeled in a completely linearized form. The linear weighted sum method with variable weights was used to transform the multi-objective problem into a single-objective problem and generate a large number of Pareto-optimal solutions. Second, the input stochastic variables were divided into multi-interval scenarios by employing the Cartesian product. For each interval scenario, the interval satisfaction degree level was proposed to convert the constraints involving interval numbers into deterministic ones. Third, a multiple attributes decision analysis (MADA) approach was proposed based on evidential reasoning theory. Six evaluation attributes, namely, the power purchase cost and pollution gas emissions of IEHS, the sum of power loss and sum of voltage deviation in the electrical system, the sum of temperature drop in the heating system, and the interval probability value of the multi-interval scenarios, were considered to rank the Pareto-optimal solutions collected from the multi-interval scenarios and determine the final dispatch solution (called the Utopia solution). Numerical simulations demonstrated that the Utopia solution can comprehensively evaluate various attributes, making it the most suitable option for meeting the operational requirements of IEHS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0175636\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0175636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decision-making for stochastic multi-objective dispatch of integrated electrical and heating systems
In the realm of modern energy systems, addressing the challenges of enhancing flexibility and efficiency under uncertain conditions is of paramount importance. This paper explores the stochastic multi-objective optimal multi-energy flow problem within the context of integrated electrical and heating systems (IEHS). First, the electrical network, the heating network, and the energy hubs were modeled in a completely linearized form. The linear weighted sum method with variable weights was used to transform the multi-objective problem into a single-objective problem and generate a large number of Pareto-optimal solutions. Second, the input stochastic variables were divided into multi-interval scenarios by employing the Cartesian product. For each interval scenario, the interval satisfaction degree level was proposed to convert the constraints involving interval numbers into deterministic ones. Third, a multiple attributes decision analysis (MADA) approach was proposed based on evidential reasoning theory. Six evaluation attributes, namely, the power purchase cost and pollution gas emissions of IEHS, the sum of power loss and sum of voltage deviation in the electrical system, the sum of temperature drop in the heating system, and the interval probability value of the multi-interval scenarios, were considered to rank the Pareto-optimal solutions collected from the multi-interval scenarios and determine the final dispatch solution (called the Utopia solution). Numerical simulations demonstrated that the Utopia solution can comprehensively evaluate various attributes, making it the most suitable option for meeting the operational requirements of IEHS.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy (JRSE) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal covering all areas of renewable and sustainable energy relevant to the physical science and engineering communities. The interdisciplinary approach of the publication ensures that the editors draw from researchers worldwide in a diverse range of fields.
Topics covered include:
Renewable energy economics and policy
Renewable energy resource assessment
Solar energy: photovoltaics, solar thermal energy, solar energy for fuels
Wind energy: wind farms, rotors and blades, on- and offshore wind conditions, aerodynamics, fluid dynamics
Bioenergy: biofuels, biomass conversion, artificial photosynthesis
Distributed energy generation: rooftop PV, distributed fuel cells, distributed wind, micro-hydrogen power generation
Power distribution & systems modeling: power electronics and controls, smart grid
Energy efficient buildings: smart windows, PV, wind, power management
Energy conversion: flexoelectric, piezoelectric, thermoelectric, other technologies
Energy storage: batteries, supercapacitors, hydrogen storage, other fuels
Fuel cells: proton exchange membrane cells, solid oxide cells, hybrid fuel cells, other
Marine and hydroelectric energy: dams, tides, waves, other
Transportation: alternative vehicle technologies, plug-in technologies, other
Geothermal energy