提高自闭症患者的休闲项目参与度

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1002/bin.1981
Eileen M. Roscoe, Valerie A. Hall, Abigail E. McVarish, R. Benjamin Cornaglia
{"title":"提高自闭症患者的休闲项目参与度","authors":"Eileen M. Roscoe,&nbsp;Valerie A. Hall,&nbsp;Abigail E. McVarish,&nbsp;R. Benjamin Cornaglia","doi":"10.1002/bin.1981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The goal of the current study was to increase functional engagement with multiple leisure items for five individuals with ASD, who had limited leisure item engagement (i.e., they engaged with only one leisure item, and after that item was restricted, they exhibited no functional engagement with alternative activities). Response restriction (RR) preference assessments were conducted to assess pre- and post-training performance to determine if training was necessary and if performance maintained following training. A component analysis that involved progressively adding intervention components (prompting alone; prompting plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior), and targeting simple engagement prior to functional engagement, was conducted. For all participants, the progressive treatment approach was effective in increasing functional engagement to criterion levels for all trained items. However, the effective training component(s) varied across participants and items. During the final post-training RR assessment, functional engagement maintained with all trained items for all participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing leisure-item engagement in individuals with autism\",\"authors\":\"Eileen M. Roscoe,&nbsp;Valerie A. Hall,&nbsp;Abigail E. McVarish,&nbsp;R. Benjamin Cornaglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bin.1981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The goal of the current study was to increase functional engagement with multiple leisure items for five individuals with ASD, who had limited leisure item engagement (i.e., they engaged with only one leisure item, and after that item was restricted, they exhibited no functional engagement with alternative activities). Response restriction (RR) preference assessments were conducted to assess pre- and post-training performance to determine if training was necessary and if performance maintained following training. A component analysis that involved progressively adding intervention components (prompting alone; prompting plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior), and targeting simple engagement prior to functional engagement, was conducted. For all participants, the progressive treatment approach was effective in increasing functional engagement to criterion levels for all trained items. However, the effective training component(s) varied across participants and items. During the final post-training RR assessment, functional engagement maintained with all trained items for all participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.1981\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.1981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目标是提高五名 ASD 患者对多个休闲项目的功能参与度,这些患者对休闲项目的参与度有限(即他们只参与一个休闲项目,在该项目受到限制后,他们对其他活动没有表现出功能参与度)。我们进行了反应限制(RR)偏好评估,以评估训练前和训练后的表现,从而确定是否有必要进行训练以及训练后的表现是否保持不变。我们进行了一项成分分析,包括逐步增加干预成分(单独提示;提示加上对替代行为的差别强化),并在功能性参与之前针对简单参与进行干预。对所有参与者而言,渐进式治疗方法都能有效地将所有训练项目的功能参与度提高到标准水平。然而,不同的参与者和训练项目所采用的有效训练方法也不尽相同。在最终的训练后 RR 评估中,所有参与者在所有训练项目上的功能参与度都保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increasing leisure-item engagement in individuals with autism

The goal of the current study was to increase functional engagement with multiple leisure items for five individuals with ASD, who had limited leisure item engagement (i.e., they engaged with only one leisure item, and after that item was restricted, they exhibited no functional engagement with alternative activities). Response restriction (RR) preference assessments were conducted to assess pre- and post-training performance to determine if training was necessary and if performance maintained following training. A component analysis that involved progressively adding intervention components (prompting alone; prompting plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior), and targeting simple engagement prior to functional engagement, was conducted. For all participants, the progressive treatment approach was effective in increasing functional engagement to criterion levels for all trained items. However, the effective training component(s) varied across participants and items. During the final post-training RR assessment, functional engagement maintained with all trained items for all participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating video feedback to improve eSports performance in Street Fighter V Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness Effects of an online group‐based intervention on effort tolerance in general education Further analysis of fixed‐lean approaches to reinforcement schedule thinning Token economies: Evidence‐based recommendations for practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1