当所有人都输了:探索失去信任和非营利行为的情感成本

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Atlantic Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1080/15456870.2023.2263122
Ashley Jones-Bodie
{"title":"当所有人都输了:探索失去信任和非营利行为的情感成本","authors":"Ashley Jones-Bodie","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2023.2263122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis project explores narratives of nonprofit wrongdoing through media coverage and organizational responses exhibited in four individual cases, representing four common types of nonprofit organizations and four distinct types of wrongdoing. Through a thematic analysis of over 450 texts, the findings from this study provide an initial examination of how nonprofit wrongdoing has been conceptualized and the discourses surrounding issues of trust, focusing on the emotional cost and fallout of nonprofit wrongdoing as a key component of broken trust. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The leading social media outlets of today were all created or became widely used after the specific cases of wrongdoing examined in this study. The cases of wrongdoing examined here occurred between 2004 and 2007. Today’s social media outlets gained widespread popularity in the years following. For example, Facebook was opened to all users regardless of university affiliation in 2006 and by 2009 was ranked as the ‘most used social network worldwide.’ Twitter was created in 2006 and had 100 million users by 2012. Instagram was created in 2010, and the first hashtag was used in 2007 (Edosomwan, Prakasan, Kouame, Watson, & Seymour, Citation2011).2 While auto-coding capabilities exist within this qualitative software, I did not use this.function but, instead, personally conducted all coding and analysis at each stage of the process.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the University of Mississippi, College of Liberal Arts [CLA Research and Creative Achievement Grant].","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When everyone loses: Exploring the emotional cost of broken trust and nonprofit wrongdoing\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Jones-Bodie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15456870.2023.2263122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis project explores narratives of nonprofit wrongdoing through media coverage and organizational responses exhibited in four individual cases, representing four common types of nonprofit organizations and four distinct types of wrongdoing. Through a thematic analysis of over 450 texts, the findings from this study provide an initial examination of how nonprofit wrongdoing has been conceptualized and the discourses surrounding issues of trust, focusing on the emotional cost and fallout of nonprofit wrongdoing as a key component of broken trust. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The leading social media outlets of today were all created or became widely used after the specific cases of wrongdoing examined in this study. The cases of wrongdoing examined here occurred between 2004 and 2007. Today’s social media outlets gained widespread popularity in the years following. For example, Facebook was opened to all users regardless of university affiliation in 2006 and by 2009 was ranked as the ‘most used social network worldwide.’ Twitter was created in 2006 and had 100 million users by 2012. Instagram was created in 2010, and the first hashtag was used in 2007 (Edosomwan, Prakasan, Kouame, Watson, & Seymour, Citation2011).2 While auto-coding capabilities exist within this qualitative software, I did not use this.function but, instead, personally conducted all coding and analysis at each stage of the process.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the University of Mississippi, College of Liberal Arts [CLA Research and Creative Achievement Grant].\",\"PeriodicalId\":45354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atlantic Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atlantic Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2023.2263122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2023.2263122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本项目通过四个案例的媒体报道和组织反应来探讨非营利组织的不法行为,这些案例代表了四种常见的非营利组织类型和四种不同的不法行为类型。通过对450多篇文章的专题分析,本研究的结果初步考察了非营利组织的不当行为是如何被概念化的,以及围绕信任问题的话语,重点关注了非营利组织的不当行为的情感成本和后果,这是信任破裂的关键组成部分。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1当今领先的社交媒体都是在本研究中审查的具体不法行为案例之后创建或被广泛使用的。这里调查的不当行为发生在2004年至2007年之间。今天的社交媒体在接下来的几年里得到了广泛的普及。例如,Facebook在2006年向所有用户开放,而不是大学,到2009年,它被评为“全球使用最多的社交网络”。Twitter创建于2006年,到2012年拥有1亿用户。Instagram创建于2010年,第一个标签是在2007年使用的(Edosomwan, Prakasan, Kouame, Watson, & Seymour, Citation2011)虽然这个定性软件中存在自动编码功能,但我没有使用它。功能,而是亲自在过程的每个阶段进行所有编码和分析。这项工作得到了密西西比大学文理学院(CLA研究与创新成就基金)的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When everyone loses: Exploring the emotional cost of broken trust and nonprofit wrongdoing
ABSTRACTThis project explores narratives of nonprofit wrongdoing through media coverage and organizational responses exhibited in four individual cases, representing four common types of nonprofit organizations and four distinct types of wrongdoing. Through a thematic analysis of over 450 texts, the findings from this study provide an initial examination of how nonprofit wrongdoing has been conceptualized and the discourses surrounding issues of trust, focusing on the emotional cost and fallout of nonprofit wrongdoing as a key component of broken trust. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The leading social media outlets of today were all created or became widely used after the specific cases of wrongdoing examined in this study. The cases of wrongdoing examined here occurred between 2004 and 2007. Today’s social media outlets gained widespread popularity in the years following. For example, Facebook was opened to all users regardless of university affiliation in 2006 and by 2009 was ranked as the ‘most used social network worldwide.’ Twitter was created in 2006 and had 100 million users by 2012. Instagram was created in 2010, and the first hashtag was used in 2007 (Edosomwan, Prakasan, Kouame, Watson, & Seymour, Citation2011).2 While auto-coding capabilities exist within this qualitative software, I did not use this.function but, instead, personally conducted all coding and analysis at each stage of the process.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the University of Mississippi, College of Liberal Arts [CLA Research and Creative Achievement Grant].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Current cases of and motivations for second screen use by generation Z: university students Everyday conversations that impact health communication: developing and validating the everyday family health communication measure Don’t try to make me laugh, let me do: persuading employees to action Theories for social justice and reduction of inequalities: a review of freirean communications Development and problems of the national journalistic model of Kazakhstan, considering social, ethical, managerial, and marketing mechanisms of the media environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1