不同回收模式下B2C平台以旧换新的最优返利支付策略

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/jimo.2023129
Huayi Li, Yuyin Yi
{"title":"不同回收模式下B2C平台以旧换新的最优返利支付策略","authors":"Huayi Li, Yuyin Yi","doi":"10.3934/jimo.2023129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online trade-ins are becoming a booming business for B2C platforms. A B2C platform usually pays the trade-in rebate by gift card, which can be used in both self-operated and third-party stores (WP) or can only be used in self-operated stores (SR). The recycling models of B2C platforms also vary. To address the decision-making issues B2C and Internet recycling platforms, this paper considers four models: Model BWP, Model BSR(i.e., the B2C platform recycling itself and using WP or SR to pay the trade-in rebate), Model TWP and Model TSR(i.e., the B2C platform collaborating with an Internet recycling platform and using WP or SR to pay the trade-in rebate).The results imply that the B2C platform's optimal trade-in payment method depends on the utility discount rate in the SR model and the commission rate charged by the B2C platform. We also find that if the commission rate is above a given threshold, the optimal trade-in effort level in the WP model is higher than that in the SR model and the B2C platform should offer a higher subsidy in Model TWP than in Model TSR. Moreover, the proportion of the trade-in cost shared by the Internet recycling platform becomes an essential factor in the selection of the recycling model and the optimal effort level under different recycling models. We ultimately find that the recycling platform should collaborate with a B2C platform that pays the trade-in rebate by WP and offer a lower trade-in rebate if the commission rate is very high.","PeriodicalId":16022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization","volume":"281 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal trade-in rebate payment strategies for B2C platforms under different recycling models\",\"authors\":\"Huayi Li, Yuyin Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/jimo.2023129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online trade-ins are becoming a booming business for B2C platforms. A B2C platform usually pays the trade-in rebate by gift card, which can be used in both self-operated and third-party stores (WP) or can only be used in self-operated stores (SR). The recycling models of B2C platforms also vary. To address the decision-making issues B2C and Internet recycling platforms, this paper considers four models: Model BWP, Model BSR(i.e., the B2C platform recycling itself and using WP or SR to pay the trade-in rebate), Model TWP and Model TSR(i.e., the B2C platform collaborating with an Internet recycling platform and using WP or SR to pay the trade-in rebate).The results imply that the B2C platform's optimal trade-in payment method depends on the utility discount rate in the SR model and the commission rate charged by the B2C platform. We also find that if the commission rate is above a given threshold, the optimal trade-in effort level in the WP model is higher than that in the SR model and the B2C platform should offer a higher subsidy in Model TWP than in Model TSR. Moreover, the proportion of the trade-in cost shared by the Internet recycling platform becomes an essential factor in the selection of the recycling model and the optimal effort level under different recycling models. We ultimately find that the recycling platform should collaborate with a B2C platform that pays the trade-in rebate by WP and offer a lower trade-in rebate if the commission rate is very high.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization\",\"volume\":\"281 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2023129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2023129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线以旧换新正在成为B2C平台蓬勃发展的业务。B2C平台通常以礼品卡的形式支付以旧换新的返利,礼品卡可以在自营店和第三方店(WP)中使用,也可以只在自营店(SR)中使用。B2C平台的回收模式也各不相同。为了解决B2C和互联网回收平台的决策问题,本文考虑了四种模型:BWP模型、BSR模型(即BSR模型)。即B2C平台自身回收,使用WP或SR支付以旧换新返利),TWP模式和TSR模式(即(B2C平台与互联网回收平台合作,使用WP或SR支付以旧换新回扣)。结果表明,B2C平台的最优以旧换新支付方式取决于SR模型中的效用折现率和B2C平台收取的佣金率。我们还发现,当佣金率高于给定阈值时,WP模型中的最优折价努力水平高于SR模型,B2C平台在TWP模型中应提供比TSR模型更高的补贴。此外,互联网回收平台分担的以旧换新成本比例成为选择回收模式和不同回收模式下的最优努力水平的重要因素。我们最终发现,回收平台应该与B2C平台合作,B2C平台通过WP支付以旧换新回扣,如果佣金率很高,则提供较低的以旧换新回扣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal trade-in rebate payment strategies for B2C platforms under different recycling models
Online trade-ins are becoming a booming business for B2C platforms. A B2C platform usually pays the trade-in rebate by gift card, which can be used in both self-operated and third-party stores (WP) or can only be used in self-operated stores (SR). The recycling models of B2C platforms also vary. To address the decision-making issues B2C and Internet recycling platforms, this paper considers four models: Model BWP, Model BSR(i.e., the B2C platform recycling itself and using WP or SR to pay the trade-in rebate), Model TWP and Model TSR(i.e., the B2C platform collaborating with an Internet recycling platform and using WP or SR to pay the trade-in rebate).The results imply that the B2C platform's optimal trade-in payment method depends on the utility discount rate in the SR model and the commission rate charged by the B2C platform. We also find that if the commission rate is above a given threshold, the optimal trade-in effort level in the WP model is higher than that in the SR model and the B2C platform should offer a higher subsidy in Model TWP than in Model TSR. Moreover, the proportion of the trade-in cost shared by the Internet recycling platform becomes an essential factor in the selection of the recycling model and the optimal effort level under different recycling models. We ultimately find that the recycling platform should collaborate with a B2C platform that pays the trade-in rebate by WP and offer a lower trade-in rebate if the commission rate is very high.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
207
审稿时长
18 months
期刊介绍: JIMO is an international journal devoted to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality, original papers on the non-trivial interplay between numerical optimization methods and practically significant problems in industry or management so as to achieve superior design, planning and/or operation. Its objective is to promote collaboration between optimization specialists, industrial practitioners and management scientists so that important practical industrial and management problems can be addressed by the use of appropriate, recent advanced optimization techniques.
期刊最新文献
A framework for treating model uncertainty in the asset liability management problem Hyperspectral super-resolution via low rank tensor triple decomposition A numerical algorithm for constrained optimal control problems Directional variational principles and applications to the existence study in optimization Impacts of reference price effect and corporate social responsibility on the pricing strategy of a remanufacturing supply chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1