评估口腔内扫描仪用于单单元种植假体构建的准确性

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization Pub Date : 2023-10-15 DOI:10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5
Elifnur Güzelce Sultanoğlu, Büşra Keleş Eroğlu
{"title":"评估口腔内扫描仪用于单单元种植假体构建的准确性","authors":"Elifnur Güzelce Sultanoğlu, Büşra Keleş Eroğlu","doi":"10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to evaluate and compare the scanning accuracy of various intraoral scanners when taking digital impressions of single-implant-supported prostheses. Methodology: A partially edentulous model with a single implant was produced, and a scan body was fixed on the model. The control model was created by scanning the model using Ineos X5 (CM). The model was also scanned (n = 3) using three different intraoral scanners (IOS) [(Helios (H), TRIOS 3 (T3), Medit (M)]. GOM Inspect software was used for comparison. The data were analyzed with a Shapiro–Wilk test, resulting in a nonnormal distribution, and Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for intergroup parameter comparisons. Results: There were significant differences in the devices’ accuracy values (p < 0.05). Accuracy M (19.1 μm), T3 (25.3 μm), H (33.9 μm) and sensitivity values (M (10 μm), T3 (19.05 μm), H (25 μm)) are similarly listed from high to low as M, T3, and H. Conclusion: IOS can be used to create digital impressions for single-unit implant crowns. Clinicians should be cautious and selective when choosing IOS for more successful and accurate impressions. More comprehensive and clinical studies using different brands are needed on this subject. How to cite this article: Güzelce Sultanoğlu E, Keleş Eroğlu B. Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction. Int Dent Res 2023;13(S1):32-37. https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5 Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction\",\"authors\":\"Elifnur Güzelce Sultanoğlu, Büşra Keleş Eroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study aims to evaluate and compare the scanning accuracy of various intraoral scanners when taking digital impressions of single-implant-supported prostheses. Methodology: A partially edentulous model with a single implant was produced, and a scan body was fixed on the model. The control model was created by scanning the model using Ineos X5 (CM). The model was also scanned (n = 3) using three different intraoral scanners (IOS) [(Helios (H), TRIOS 3 (T3), Medit (M)]. GOM Inspect software was used for comparison. The data were analyzed with a Shapiro–Wilk test, resulting in a nonnormal distribution, and Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for intergroup parameter comparisons. Results: There were significant differences in the devices’ accuracy values (p < 0.05). Accuracy M (19.1 μm), T3 (25.3 μm), H (33.9 μm) and sensitivity values (M (10 μm), T3 (19.05 μm), H (25 μm)) are similarly listed from high to low as M, T3, and H. Conclusion: IOS can be used to create digital impressions for single-unit implant crowns. Clinicians should be cautious and selective when choosing IOS for more successful and accurate impressions. More comprehensive and clinical studies using different brands are needed on this subject. How to cite this article: Güzelce Sultanoğlu E, Keleş Eroğlu B. Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction. Int Dent Res 2023;13(S1):32-37. https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5 Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估和比较各种口腔内扫描仪在单种植体支持的修复体进行数字印模时的扫描精度。方法:制作单个种植体的部分无牙模型,将扫描体固定在模型上。采用Ineos X5 (CM)扫描模型建立控制模型。同时使用三种不同的口内扫描仪(IOS) [Helios (H), TRIOS 3 (T3), Medit (M)]对模型进行扫描(n = 3)。采用GOM Inspect软件进行比较。数据分析采用Shapiro-Wilk检验,结果为非正态分布,组间参数比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:两组患者的器械准确度值差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。精度M (19.1 μm)、T3 (25.3 μm)、H (33.9 μm)和灵敏度(M (10 μm)、T3 (19.05 μm)、H (25 μm))从高到低依次为M、T3、H。结论:IOS可以用于单单元种植冠的数字印模制作。临床医生应该谨慎和选择性地选择IOS,以获得更成功和准确的印象。在这个问题上,需要使用不同品牌进行更全面的临床研究。g zelce Sultanoğlu E, keleek Eroğlu B.评估口腔内扫描仪在单单元种植体修复中的准确性。国际医学杂志,2013;13(S1):32-37。https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction
Aim: This study aims to evaluate and compare the scanning accuracy of various intraoral scanners when taking digital impressions of single-implant-supported prostheses. Methodology: A partially edentulous model with a single implant was produced, and a scan body was fixed on the model. The control model was created by scanning the model using Ineos X5 (CM). The model was also scanned (n = 3) using three different intraoral scanners (IOS) [(Helios (H), TRIOS 3 (T3), Medit (M)]. GOM Inspect software was used for comparison. The data were analyzed with a Shapiro–Wilk test, resulting in a nonnormal distribution, and Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for intergroup parameter comparisons. Results: There were significant differences in the devices’ accuracy values (p < 0.05). Accuracy M (19.1 μm), T3 (25.3 μm), H (33.9 μm) and sensitivity values (M (10 μm), T3 (19.05 μm), H (25 μm)) are similarly listed from high to low as M, T3, and H. Conclusion: IOS can be used to create digital impressions for single-unit implant crowns. Clinicians should be cautious and selective when choosing IOS for more successful and accurate impressions. More comprehensive and clinical studies using different brands are needed on this subject. How to cite this article: Güzelce Sultanoğlu E, Keleş Eroğlu B. Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction. Int Dent Res 2023;13(S1):32-37. https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.5 Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction Evaluation of the buccal bone thickness in the anterior maxillary region using cone-beam computed tomography Evaluation of the alveolar bone and lingual concavity in the posterior mandibular region based on cone-beam computed tomography data Evaluation of the effect of class II fixed orthodontic treatment on the periradicular bone structure of endodontically treated mandibular molar teeth using fractal dimension analysis Analyzing biomimetic dentistry YouTube videos' quality and content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1