模糊Theo-logics

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1177/00405736231197439
Gordon S. Mikoski
{"title":"模糊Theo-logics","authors":"Gordon S. Mikoski","doi":"10.1177/00405736231197439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I have never warmed up to theological visions that make a hard and fast distinction between the church and the world. I have always found such distinctions inaccurate, if not downright farcical. It is a pious and noble idea to think that the church functions as a community of believers who live a qualitatively different life than the rest of the people in the society in which they live. The correlate to the church as a “set apart” community entails that “the world” or secular society lacks kindness, mercy, or awe at the transcendent mysteries of life. This distinction does not hold up under empirical scrutiny and turns out to be more of a desire than a demonstrable reality. My first problem with the “godly church vs. godless world” theoretical construct is that it does not resonate with my pastoral experience and observations of actual church people. On most days, it is hard to tell the difference between what they do “inside” church and what they do “outside” in other aspects of society. I have witnessed shockingly godless behavior among church people while they were doing churchy things. My second problem with this fantastical construct has to do with the fact that many of the so-called “secular” arenas of human life often bear witness to people acting with care and compassion toward others and showing respectful curiosity at life’s mysteries. This is not to say that I cannot detect any difference between what goes on in the church fellowship hall and the shopping mall; it is just that the lines have always seemed rather fuzzy to me. There are deeper levels to my unease with sharp dividing-line theories like Luther’s two kingdoms theory and with more contemporary neo-Aristotelian Protestant virtue ethics. As a Reformed pastor and practical theologian, I object on principle to the idea that some part of creation has been abandoned by God and turned over to malignant forces of godlessness. Theologically, I see all of creation as coming from and belonging to God. This world is God’s world—always has been, is now, and always will be. Corruption, evil, rebellion, and dehumanization stem, in my admittedly Calvinian-Augustinian view, from the disordering or twisting of things that are created good. If some parts of creation were to be truly abandoned by God, I believe that they","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy Theo-logics\",\"authors\":\"Gordon S. Mikoski\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00405736231197439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I have never warmed up to theological visions that make a hard and fast distinction between the church and the world. I have always found such distinctions inaccurate, if not downright farcical. It is a pious and noble idea to think that the church functions as a community of believers who live a qualitatively different life than the rest of the people in the society in which they live. The correlate to the church as a “set apart” community entails that “the world” or secular society lacks kindness, mercy, or awe at the transcendent mysteries of life. This distinction does not hold up under empirical scrutiny and turns out to be more of a desire than a demonstrable reality. My first problem with the “godly church vs. godless world” theoretical construct is that it does not resonate with my pastoral experience and observations of actual church people. On most days, it is hard to tell the difference between what they do “inside” church and what they do “outside” in other aspects of society. I have witnessed shockingly godless behavior among church people while they were doing churchy things. My second problem with this fantastical construct has to do with the fact that many of the so-called “secular” arenas of human life often bear witness to people acting with care and compassion toward others and showing respectful curiosity at life’s mysteries. This is not to say that I cannot detect any difference between what goes on in the church fellowship hall and the shopping mall; it is just that the lines have always seemed rather fuzzy to me. There are deeper levels to my unease with sharp dividing-line theories like Luther’s two kingdoms theory and with more contemporary neo-Aristotelian Protestant virtue ethics. As a Reformed pastor and practical theologian, I object on principle to the idea that some part of creation has been abandoned by God and turned over to malignant forces of godlessness. Theologically, I see all of creation as coming from and belonging to God. This world is God’s world—always has been, is now, and always will be. Corruption, evil, rebellion, and dehumanization stem, in my admittedly Calvinian-Augustinian view, from the disordering or twisting of things that are created good. If some parts of creation were to be truly abandoned by God, I believe that they\",\"PeriodicalId\":43855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEOLOGY TODAY\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEOLOGY TODAY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231197439\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEOLOGY TODAY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231197439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fuzzy Theo-logics
I have never warmed up to theological visions that make a hard and fast distinction between the church and the world. I have always found such distinctions inaccurate, if not downright farcical. It is a pious and noble idea to think that the church functions as a community of believers who live a qualitatively different life than the rest of the people in the society in which they live. The correlate to the church as a “set apart” community entails that “the world” or secular society lacks kindness, mercy, or awe at the transcendent mysteries of life. This distinction does not hold up under empirical scrutiny and turns out to be more of a desire than a demonstrable reality. My first problem with the “godly church vs. godless world” theoretical construct is that it does not resonate with my pastoral experience and observations of actual church people. On most days, it is hard to tell the difference between what they do “inside” church and what they do “outside” in other aspects of society. I have witnessed shockingly godless behavior among church people while they were doing churchy things. My second problem with this fantastical construct has to do with the fact that many of the so-called “secular” arenas of human life often bear witness to people acting with care and compassion toward others and showing respectful curiosity at life’s mysteries. This is not to say that I cannot detect any difference between what goes on in the church fellowship hall and the shopping mall; it is just that the lines have always seemed rather fuzzy to me. There are deeper levels to my unease with sharp dividing-line theories like Luther’s two kingdoms theory and with more contemporary neo-Aristotelian Protestant virtue ethics. As a Reformed pastor and practical theologian, I object on principle to the idea that some part of creation has been abandoned by God and turned over to malignant forces of godlessness. Theologically, I see all of creation as coming from and belonging to God. This world is God’s world—always has been, is now, and always will be. Corruption, evil, rebellion, and dehumanization stem, in my admittedly Calvinian-Augustinian view, from the disordering or twisting of things that are created good. If some parts of creation were to be truly abandoned by God, I believe that they
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
THEOLOGY TODAY
THEOLOGY TODAY RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Environmentalism as Religion The Significance of the Theological Declaration of Barmen 1934 and “Christophobia in Europe” Today Book Review: The Ethics of Tainted Legacies: Human Flourishing after Traumatic Pasts by Karen V. Guth Book Review: 20 Myths about Religion and Politics in America by Ryan P. Burge Book Review: Against the Hounds of Hell: A Life of Howard Thurman by Peter Eisenstadt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1