QuEChERS分散- spe净化过程中农药与净化剂的相互作用

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.56042/jsir.v82i10.3079
{"title":"QuEChERS分散- spe净化过程中农药与净化剂的相互作用","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jsir.v82i10.3079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A method was developed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy for the identification and quantification of multi residues of pesticides. The present study is first of this kind, destined purely to understand the interaction between the clean-up agents with 103 pesticides. The QuEChERS clean-up, employing most commonly used clean-up agents like anhyd.MgSO4, PSA, C-18 and GCB in twelve combinations, was performed to assess their adsorption behavior with the pesticides. Recovery studies at 1μg∙mL−1 showed that anhyd.MgSO4 gave acceptable recovery for 100 pesticides (97.08%) in treatment T1. The PSA adsorbed some polar and acidic pesticides onto it and gave acceptable recovery for < 90% pesticides in T2 to T5 and C-18 with anhyd.MgSO4 &amp; varying amount of PSA (T6, T7) gave a lower, but acceptable recovery of 83.49% pesticides. GCB with anhyd.MgSO4 &amp; varying amount of PSA (T8, T9), adsorbed some planar pesticides like carbendazim, tricyclazole and gave a lower, but acceptable recovery for 74.75 – 77.66% pesticides. In T10 to T12, when all the adsorbents were used, adsorption of polar, acidic and planar pesticides (25.24%) was observed while rest of the pesticides (74.75%) gave acceptable recovery. The method also satisfied the single laboratory validation criteria for linearity, specificity, accuracy and precision.","PeriodicalId":17010,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction of Pesticides with Clean-up Agents during QuEChERS Dispersive-SPE Clean-up\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.56042/jsir.v82i10.3079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A method was developed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy for the identification and quantification of multi residues of pesticides. The present study is first of this kind, destined purely to understand the interaction between the clean-up agents with 103 pesticides. The QuEChERS clean-up, employing most commonly used clean-up agents like anhyd.MgSO4, PSA, C-18 and GCB in twelve combinations, was performed to assess their adsorption behavior with the pesticides. Recovery studies at 1μg∙mL−1 showed that anhyd.MgSO4 gave acceptable recovery for 100 pesticides (97.08%) in treatment T1. The PSA adsorbed some polar and acidic pesticides onto it and gave acceptable recovery for < 90% pesticides in T2 to T5 and C-18 with anhyd.MgSO4 &amp; varying amount of PSA (T6, T7) gave a lower, but acceptable recovery of 83.49% pesticides. GCB with anhyd.MgSO4 &amp; varying amount of PSA (T8, T9), adsorbed some planar pesticides like carbendazim, tricyclazole and gave a lower, but acceptable recovery for 74.75 – 77.66% pesticides. In T10 to T12, when all the adsorbents were used, adsorption of polar, acidic and planar pesticides (25.24%) was observed while rest of the pesticides (74.75%) gave acceptable recovery. The method also satisfied the single laboratory validation criteria for linearity, specificity, accuracy and precision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v82i10.3079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v82i10.3079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立了液相色谱串联质谱法对农药多种残留进行鉴定和定量的方法。目前的研究是第一个这样的研究,目的纯粹是为了了解清理剂与103种农药之间的相互作用。QuEChERS清理,使用最常用的清理代理,如anhyd。研究了MgSO4、PSA、C-18和GCB对农药的吸附行为。在1μg∙mL−1浓度下的恢复研究表明;MgSO4对100种农药的回收率为97.08%。PSA吸附了一些极性和酸性农药,回收率可接受。T2至T5和C-18中90%的农药含有酸酐。MgSO4,不同浓度的PSA (T6、T7)的回收率较低,为83.49%,但仍可接受。GCB与酸酐。MgSO4,不同用量的PSA (T8、T9)对多菌灵、三环唑等平面型农药的吸附效果较好,回收率为74.75 ~ 77.66%。在T10 ~ T12中,当使用所有吸附剂时,极性、酸性和平面农药的吸附率为25.24%,其余农药的回收率为74.75%。该方法在线性度、特异度、准确度和精密度等方面均满足单实验室验证标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interaction of Pesticides with Clean-up Agents during QuEChERS Dispersive-SPE Clean-up
A method was developed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy for the identification and quantification of multi residues of pesticides. The present study is first of this kind, destined purely to understand the interaction between the clean-up agents with 103 pesticides. The QuEChERS clean-up, employing most commonly used clean-up agents like anhyd.MgSO4, PSA, C-18 and GCB in twelve combinations, was performed to assess their adsorption behavior with the pesticides. Recovery studies at 1μg∙mL−1 showed that anhyd.MgSO4 gave acceptable recovery for 100 pesticides (97.08%) in treatment T1. The PSA adsorbed some polar and acidic pesticides onto it and gave acceptable recovery for < 90% pesticides in T2 to T5 and C-18 with anhyd.MgSO4 & varying amount of PSA (T6, T7) gave a lower, but acceptable recovery of 83.49% pesticides. GCB with anhyd.MgSO4 & varying amount of PSA (T8, T9), adsorbed some planar pesticides like carbendazim, tricyclazole and gave a lower, but acceptable recovery for 74.75 – 77.66% pesticides. In T10 to T12, when all the adsorbents were used, adsorption of polar, acidic and planar pesticides (25.24%) was observed while rest of the pesticides (74.75%) gave acceptable recovery. The method also satisfied the single laboratory validation criteria for linearity, specificity, accuracy and precision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research
Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
99
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This oldest journal of NISCAIR (started in 1942) carries comprehensive reviews in different fields of science & technology (S&T), including industry, original articles, short communications and case studies, on various facets of industrial development, industrial research, technology management, technology forecasting, instrumentation and analytical techniques, specially of direct relevance to industrial entrepreneurs, debates on key industrial issues, editorials/technical commentaries, reports on S&T conferences, extensive book reviews and various industry related announcements.It covers all facets of industrial development.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Porous Titanium Spinal Cage with Conventional Spinal Cages: A Finite Element Study Mining of Potential Antifungal Molecules for Control of Fusarium fujikuroi in Rice using in silico and in vitro Analysis Uncovering Issues Impacting Mobile Banking Performance using ISM-MICMAC Approach A A Novel BCI - based Silent Speech Recognition using Hybrid Feature Extraction Techniques and Integrated Stacking Classifier Improved Chaotic Grey Wolf Optimization for Training Neural Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1