“只有患者知道”:肾移植受者的长期问题和经历:现象学研究

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Collegian Pub Date : 2023-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2023.09.004
Deniz Taşdemir , Büşra Nur Temür , Nilgün Aksoy
{"title":"“只有患者知道”:肾移植受者的长期问题和经历:现象学研究","authors":"Deniz Taşdemir ,&nbsp;Büşra Nur Temür ,&nbsp;Nilgün Aksoy","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding the experiences of kidney transplant recipients is important to ensure their inclusion in key strategies and future planning of renal services.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore the long-term problems and experiences of adults who have had a kidney transplant due to end-stage kidney disease after discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a descriptive phenomenological study. The data were collected through in-depth interviews. A personal information form and semi-structured interview guide were used in the interviews. The interviews were recorded using a voice recorder and conducted by adhering to the semi-structured interview guide. When data saturation was reached and no new information emerged, data collection was terminated after the 17th participant, whose responses were found to be repetitive. In this study, a descriptive phenomenological design and thematic analysis approach based on Husserl’s philosophy was used. The data analysis process was carried out independently by all researchers. Throughout this process, the researchers held regular meetings to discuss and compare the emerging findings. Individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were transcribed verbatim. The findings were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>In total, 17 kidney transplant recipients (five women and 12 men) were included in the study. In the data analysis process, three main themes and 10 sub-themes were identified. Main themes: (i) problems experienced by kidney transplant recipients, (ii) inevitable fears, and (iii) situations that only individuals with kidney transplants can understand — “Only the Sufferer Knows”. Sub-themes: management of drug therapy, role–relationship management, permanent treatment responsibilities and burden, fear of rejection, fear of returning to </span>dialysis treatment, pervasive fear of routine examination results, significance of kidney transplant surgery, sense of gratitude towards the donor, being ‘sick’ in the eyes of others, and not being understood by others.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides new insights into understanding the lives of post-transplant kidney transplant recipients. Renal healthcare professionals should focus on the psychological impact as much as the biological impact on recipients of kidney transplants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 835-842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Only the Sufferer Knows”: Long-term problems and experiences of kidney transplant recipients: A phenomenological study\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Taşdemir ,&nbsp;Büşra Nur Temür ,&nbsp;Nilgün Aksoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding the experiences of kidney transplant recipients is important to ensure their inclusion in key strategies and future planning of renal services.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore the long-term problems and experiences of adults who have had a kidney transplant due to end-stage kidney disease after discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a descriptive phenomenological study. The data were collected through in-depth interviews. A personal information form and semi-structured interview guide were used in the interviews. The interviews were recorded using a voice recorder and conducted by adhering to the semi-structured interview guide. When data saturation was reached and no new information emerged, data collection was terminated after the 17th participant, whose responses were found to be repetitive. In this study, a descriptive phenomenological design and thematic analysis approach based on Husserl’s philosophy was used. The data analysis process was carried out independently by all researchers. Throughout this process, the researchers held regular meetings to discuss and compare the emerging findings. Individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were transcribed verbatim. The findings were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>In total, 17 kidney transplant recipients (five women and 12 men) were included in the study. In the data analysis process, three main themes and 10 sub-themes were identified. Main themes: (i) problems experienced by kidney transplant recipients, (ii) inevitable fears, and (iii) situations that only individuals with kidney transplants can understand — “Only the Sufferer Knows”. Sub-themes: management of drug therapy, role–relationship management, permanent treatment responsibilities and burden, fear of rejection, fear of returning to </span>dialysis treatment, pervasive fear of routine examination results, significance of kidney transplant surgery, sense of gratitude towards the donor, being ‘sick’ in the eyes of others, and not being understood by others.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides new insights into understanding the lives of post-transplant kidney transplant recipients. Renal healthcare professionals should focus on the psychological impact as much as the biological impact on recipients of kidney transplants.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 835-842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000938\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景了解肾移植受者的经历对于确保将其纳入肾脏服务的关键策略和未来规划至关重要。目的探讨成人终末期肾病患者出院后肾移植的长期问题和经验。方法采用描述现象学研究。数据是通过深度访谈收集的。访谈采用个人信息表和半结构化访谈指南。访谈使用录音机录音,并按照半结构化访谈指南进行。当数据达到饱和且没有新信息出现时,在第17位参与者的回答被发现是重复的之后,终止数据收集。本研究采用胡塞尔哲学的描述性现象学设计和主题分析方法。数据分析过程由所有研究人员独立进行。在整个过程中,研究人员定期召开会议,讨论和比较新发现。个别的、半结构化的、深入的采访逐字逐句地记录下来。这些发现是用Colaizzi的七步分析法进行分析的。结果共纳入17例肾移植受者,其中女性5例,男性12例。在数据分析过程中,确定了3个主题和10个副主题。主题:(i)肾移植受者所经历的问题,(ii)不可避免的恐惧,以及(iii)只有肾移植患者才能理解的情况-“只有患者知道”。分主题:药物治疗的管理、角色关系管理、永久治疗的责任和负担、对排斥的恐惧、对重新接受透析治疗的恐惧、对常规检查结果的普遍恐惧、肾移植手术的意义、对捐赠者的感激、在他人眼中的“生病”、不被他人理解。结论本研究为了解肾移植后受者的生活状况提供了新的思路。肾保健专业人员应该关注对肾移植受者的心理影响和生物学影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Only the Sufferer Knows”: Long-term problems and experiences of kidney transplant recipients: A phenomenological study

Background

Understanding the experiences of kidney transplant recipients is important to ensure their inclusion in key strategies and future planning of renal services.

Aim

To explore the long-term problems and experiences of adults who have had a kidney transplant due to end-stage kidney disease after discharge.

Methods

This was a descriptive phenomenological study. The data were collected through in-depth interviews. A personal information form and semi-structured interview guide were used in the interviews. The interviews were recorded using a voice recorder and conducted by adhering to the semi-structured interview guide. When data saturation was reached and no new information emerged, data collection was terminated after the 17th participant, whose responses were found to be repetitive. In this study, a descriptive phenomenological design and thematic analysis approach based on Husserl’s philosophy was used. The data analysis process was carried out independently by all researchers. Throughout this process, the researchers held regular meetings to discuss and compare the emerging findings. Individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were transcribed verbatim. The findings were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis.

Results

In total, 17 kidney transplant recipients (five women and 12 men) were included in the study. In the data analysis process, three main themes and 10 sub-themes were identified. Main themes: (i) problems experienced by kidney transplant recipients, (ii) inevitable fears, and (iii) situations that only individuals with kidney transplants can understand — “Only the Sufferer Knows”. Sub-themes: management of drug therapy, role–relationship management, permanent treatment responsibilities and burden, fear of rejection, fear of returning to dialysis treatment, pervasive fear of routine examination results, significance of kidney transplant surgery, sense of gratitude towards the donor, being ‘sick’ in the eyes of others, and not being understood by others.

Conclusion

This study provides new insights into understanding the lives of post-transplant kidney transplant recipients. Renal healthcare professionals should focus on the psychological impact as much as the biological impact on recipients of kidney transplants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Staff perceptions of the potential for nurses to address service gaps within a homeless health service in Sydney, Australia: Results of a cross-sectional survey Workplace violence against nurses in rural governmental hospitals in Jordan Implementation of evidence-based practice in paediatric nursing care: Facilitators and barriers Weaning small babies from incubator to cot: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1