Coline Hehn , Amine Ounajim , Guy Fagherazzi , Antonia Gasch-Illescas , Guillaume Montagu , Catherine Rumeau-Pichon , Jean-Arnaud Elissalde , Ben Braithwaite , Hervé Servy , Charles Thivolet , Jean-François Thébaut , Nicolas Naïditch
{"title":"1型和2型糖尿病患者报告体验测量电子问卷的开发和验证:糖尿病报告体验测量(DREMS)","authors":"Coline Hehn , Amine Ounajim , Guy Fagherazzi , Antonia Gasch-Illescas , Guillaume Montagu , Catherine Rumeau-Pichon , Jean-Arnaud Elissalde , Ben Braithwaite , Hervé Servy , Charles Thivolet , Jean-François Thébaut , Nicolas Naïditch","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Successful diabetes management is associated with an effective partnership between People with Diabetes (PwD) and healthcare professionals. Though possible to measure using Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs), none are specific to Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes (T1D/T2D) and validated in French. Thus, we developed and validated the DREMS (Diabetes Reported Experience MeasureS) e-questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>DREMS is comprised of 18 items evaluating 5 different factors. Validation for use by PwT1D and PwT2D (recruited online) was performed using: Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA); Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Cronbach's Alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated through Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) in a subsample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DREMS was tested by 2,513 respondents, including 942 PwT1D and 1,571 PwT2D. For both groups, EFA results indicated 18 items loaded substantially onto 5 clear factors. CFA showed all coefficients were significant in their respective factors. Goodness-of-fit, assessed using the Comparative Fit Index was >0.90 and by the RMSEA was <0.080. Cronbach's α for the entire DREMS e-questionnaire was ≥0.90. ICC was 0.87 for PwT1D (<em>n</em> = 136) and 0.74 for PwT2D (<em>n</em> = 169).</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>DREMS is the first validated French-language diabetes-specific PREM for both PwT1D and PwT2D and can be useful to evaluate and improve health care management and patient health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000689/pdfft?md5=71075b5848061526d26e74a4653ae1e9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666970623000689-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes-specific patient-reported experience measure e-questionnaire: Diabetes reported experience measures (DREMS)\",\"authors\":\"Coline Hehn , Amine Ounajim , Guy Fagherazzi , Antonia Gasch-Illescas , Guillaume Montagu , Catherine Rumeau-Pichon , Jean-Arnaud Elissalde , Ben Braithwaite , Hervé Servy , Charles Thivolet , Jean-François Thébaut , Nicolas Naïditch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Successful diabetes management is associated with an effective partnership between People with Diabetes (PwD) and healthcare professionals. Though possible to measure using Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs), none are specific to Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes (T1D/T2D) and validated in French. Thus, we developed and validated the DREMS (Diabetes Reported Experience MeasureS) e-questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>DREMS is comprised of 18 items evaluating 5 different factors. Validation for use by PwT1D and PwT2D (recruited online) was performed using: Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA); Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Cronbach's Alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated through Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) in a subsample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DREMS was tested by 2,513 respondents, including 942 PwT1D and 1,571 PwT2D. For both groups, EFA results indicated 18 items loaded substantially onto 5 clear factors. CFA showed all coefficients were significant in their respective factors. Goodness-of-fit, assessed using the Comparative Fit Index was >0.90 and by the RMSEA was <0.080. Cronbach's α for the entire DREMS e-questionnaire was ≥0.90. ICC was 0.87 for PwT1D (<em>n</em> = 136) and 0.74 for PwT2D (<em>n</em> = 169).</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>DREMS is the first validated French-language diabetes-specific PREM for both PwT1D and PwT2D and can be useful to evaluate and improve health care management and patient health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000689/pdfft?md5=71075b5848061526d26e74a4653ae1e9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666970623000689-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and validation of a Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes-specific patient-reported experience measure e-questionnaire: Diabetes reported experience measures (DREMS)
Introduction
Successful diabetes management is associated with an effective partnership between People with Diabetes (PwD) and healthcare professionals. Though possible to measure using Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs), none are specific to Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes (T1D/T2D) and validated in French. Thus, we developed and validated the DREMS (Diabetes Reported Experience MeasureS) e-questionnaire.
Methodology
DREMS is comprised of 18 items evaluating 5 different factors. Validation for use by PwT1D and PwT2D (recruited online) was performed using: Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA); Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Cronbach's Alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated through Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) in a subsample.
Results
DREMS was tested by 2,513 respondents, including 942 PwT1D and 1,571 PwT2D. For both groups, EFA results indicated 18 items loaded substantially onto 5 clear factors. CFA showed all coefficients were significant in their respective factors. Goodness-of-fit, assessed using the Comparative Fit Index was >0.90 and by the RMSEA was <0.080. Cronbach's α for the entire DREMS e-questionnaire was ≥0.90. ICC was 0.87 for PwT1D (n = 136) and 0.74 for PwT2D (n = 169).
Innovation
DREMS is the first validated French-language diabetes-specific PREM for both PwT1D and PwT2D and can be useful to evaluate and improve health care management and patient health.