eursdr rpas基准:开放数据集描述和关键结果摘要

J. P. Mills, M. V. Peppa, A. Alma'Amari, L. Davidson, J. Goodyear, N. T. Penna
{"title":"eursdr rpas基准:开放数据集描述和关键结果摘要","authors":"J. P. Mills, M. V. Peppa, A. Alma'Amari, L. Davidson, J. Goodyear, N. T. Penna","doi":"10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-w3-2023-107-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In 2021 EuroSDR initiated a benchmark study with the aim to evaluate the geometric quality of real-world survey data generated from state-of-practice commercial Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) photogrammetry (including DJI P4 RTK and DJI P1) and lidar (including DJI L1 and Riegl MiniVUX). The particular benchmark focus was on achievable data quality from real-world network configurations in the absence of ground control, on-the-fly Real Time Kinematic (RTK) corrections, and/or local GNSS base station information. Successive custom datasets were released to registered benchmark participants who submitted individual outputs that were independently evaluated against reference surveys. Without the inclusion of any supporting ground information, DJI P4 RTK and DJI P1 RPAS solutions were found to deliver m- and dm-level accuracies, respectively, in both plan and height. RTK solutions were found to provide cm-level precisions and accuracies, with some outliers. The introduction of ground control points resulted in similar planimetric accuracy to the RTK solutions, but with slight improvements in height. In terms of lidar datasets, the Riegl MiniVUX solution, using corrections from a local base station, was found to provide smaller discrepancies than the DJI L1 RTK solution, when independently compared against terrestrial laser scanning surveys. This paper provides various quality statistics and demonstrates multiple ways of assessing the geometric quality of RPAS data. The EuroSDR RPAS benchmark datasets are now openly available online in order to support and facilitate further investigation by the community.","PeriodicalId":30634,"journal":{"name":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EUROSDR RPAS BENCHMARK: OPEN DATASET DESCRIPTION AND SUMMARY OF KEY RESULTS\",\"authors\":\"J. P. Mills, M. V. Peppa, A. Alma'Amari, L. Davidson, J. Goodyear, N. T. Penna\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-w3-2023-107-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. In 2021 EuroSDR initiated a benchmark study with the aim to evaluate the geometric quality of real-world survey data generated from state-of-practice commercial Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) photogrammetry (including DJI P4 RTK and DJI P1) and lidar (including DJI L1 and Riegl MiniVUX). The particular benchmark focus was on achievable data quality from real-world network configurations in the absence of ground control, on-the-fly Real Time Kinematic (RTK) corrections, and/or local GNSS base station information. Successive custom datasets were released to registered benchmark participants who submitted individual outputs that were independently evaluated against reference surveys. Without the inclusion of any supporting ground information, DJI P4 RTK and DJI P1 RPAS solutions were found to deliver m- and dm-level accuracies, respectively, in both plan and height. RTK solutions were found to provide cm-level precisions and accuracies, with some outliers. The introduction of ground control points resulted in similar planimetric accuracy to the RTK solutions, but with slight improvements in height. In terms of lidar datasets, the Riegl MiniVUX solution, using corrections from a local base station, was found to provide smaller discrepancies than the DJI L1 RTK solution, when independently compared against terrestrial laser scanning surveys. This paper provides various quality statistics and demonstrates multiple ways of assessing the geometric quality of RPAS data. The EuroSDR RPAS benchmark datasets are now openly available online in order to support and facilitate further investigation by the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-w3-2023-107-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-w3-2023-107-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要2021年,EuroSDR启动了一项基准研究,旨在评估实际商用遥控飞机系统(RPAS)摄影测量(包括DJI P4 RTK和DJI P1)和激光雷达(包括DJI L1和Riegl MiniVUX)产生的真实世界调查数据的几何质量。该基准测试的重点是在没有地面控制、实时运动学(RTK)校正和/或本地GNSS基站信息的情况下,从实际网络配置中获得的数据质量。连续的自定义数据集发布给已注册的基准参与者,他们提交了单独的产出,并根据参考调查进行独立评估。在不包含任何辅助地面信息的情况下,DJI P4 RTK和DJI P1 RPAS解决方案分别在平面和高度上提供m级和dm级精度。RTK解决方案被发现提供厘米级的精度和准确度,有一些异常值。地面控制点的引入导致了与RTK解决方案相似的平面精度,但在高度上略有改进。就激光雷达数据集而言,Riegl MiniVUX解决方案使用了本地基站的校正,当与地面激光扫描测量独立比较时,发现比DJI L1 RTK解决方案提供的差异更小。本文提供了各种质量统计,并展示了评估RPAS数据几何质量的多种方法。EuroSDR RPAS基准数据集现已在网上公开,以支持和促进社区的进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE EUROSDR RPAS BENCHMARK: OPEN DATASET DESCRIPTION AND SUMMARY OF KEY RESULTS
Abstract. In 2021 EuroSDR initiated a benchmark study with the aim to evaluate the geometric quality of real-world survey data generated from state-of-practice commercial Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) photogrammetry (including DJI P4 RTK and DJI P1) and lidar (including DJI L1 and Riegl MiniVUX). The particular benchmark focus was on achievable data quality from real-world network configurations in the absence of ground control, on-the-fly Real Time Kinematic (RTK) corrections, and/or local GNSS base station information. Successive custom datasets were released to registered benchmark participants who submitted individual outputs that were independently evaluated against reference surveys. Without the inclusion of any supporting ground information, DJI P4 RTK and DJI P1 RPAS solutions were found to deliver m- and dm-level accuracies, respectively, in both plan and height. RTK solutions were found to provide cm-level precisions and accuracies, with some outliers. The introduction of ground control points resulted in similar planimetric accuracy to the RTK solutions, but with slight improvements in height. In terms of lidar datasets, the Riegl MiniVUX solution, using corrections from a local base station, was found to provide smaller discrepancies than the DJI L1 RTK solution, when independently compared against terrestrial laser scanning surveys. This paper provides various quality statistics and demonstrates multiple ways of assessing the geometric quality of RPAS data. The EuroSDR RPAS benchmark datasets are now openly available online in order to support and facilitate further investigation by the community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
949
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF CONSUMER-GRADE AND SURVEY-GRADE UAV-LIDAR EVALUATING GEOMETRY OF AN INDOOR SCENARIO WITH OCCLUSIONS BASED ON TOTAL STATION MEASUREMENTS OF WALL ELEMENTS INVESTIGATION ON THE USE OF NeRF FOR HERITAGE 3D DENSE RECONSTRUCTION FOR INTERIOR SPACES TERRESTRIAL 3D MAPPING OF FORESTS: GEOREFERENCING CHALLENGES AND SENSORS COMPARISONS SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF IMAGES OF PLANTS UNDER STRESS USING A CLOSE-RANGE CAMERA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1