流动性比率和公司破产

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1111/acfi.13174
Ken Li
{"title":"流动性比率和公司破产","authors":"Ken Li","doi":"10.1111/acfi.13174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the most widespread claims in financial statement analysis is that liquidity ratios are useful for predicting failures. However, academic research has found surprisingly little empirical support for this claim. Using logistic regression splines, a non‐parametric method, this paper finds that the relation between the current ratio and failures differs significantly depending on the level of the current ratio. At low, but not high levels, the current ratio is significantly negatively related to failure. Incorporating such context provides statistically and economically significant predictive power about failures. These findings help resolve the discrepancy between practitioners and the academic literature.","PeriodicalId":47973,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and Finance","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquidity ratios and corporate failures\",\"authors\":\"Ken Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acfi.13174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract One of the most widespread claims in financial statement analysis is that liquidity ratios are useful for predicting failures. However, academic research has found surprisingly little empirical support for this claim. Using logistic regression splines, a non‐parametric method, this paper finds that the relation between the current ratio and failures differs significantly depending on the level of the current ratio. At low, but not high levels, the current ratio is significantly negatively related to failure. Incorporating such context provides statistically and economically significant predictive power about failures. These findings help resolve the discrepancy between practitioners and the academic literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting and Finance\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13174\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财务报表分析中最普遍的主张之一是流动性比率对预测失败有用。然而,令人惊讶的是,学术研究发现很少有实证支持这一说法。利用逻辑回归样条(一种非参数方法),本文发现电流比与故障之间的关系随着电流比的高低而显著不同。在低但不高的水平下,电流比率与故障显著负相关。结合这样的背景,提供了对故障的统计和经济上重要的预测能力。这些发现有助于解决实践者与学术文献之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liquidity ratios and corporate failures
Abstract One of the most widespread claims in financial statement analysis is that liquidity ratios are useful for predicting failures. However, academic research has found surprisingly little empirical support for this claim. Using logistic regression splines, a non‐parametric method, this paper finds that the relation between the current ratio and failures differs significantly depending on the level of the current ratio. At low, but not high levels, the current ratio is significantly negatively related to failure. Incorporating such context provides statistically and economically significant predictive power about failures. These findings help resolve the discrepancy between practitioners and the academic literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting and Finance
Accounting and Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Accounting & Finance enjoys an excellent reputation as an academic journal that publishes articles addressing significant research questions from a broad range of perspectives. The journal: • publishes significant contributions to the accounting, finance, business information systems and related disciplines • develops, tests, or advances accounting, finance and information systems theory, research and practice • publishes theoretical, empirical and experimental papers that significantly contribute to the disciplines of accounting and finance • publishes articles using a wide range of research methods including statistical analysis, analytical work, case studies, field research and historical analysis • applies economic, organizational and other theories to accounting and finance phenomena and publishes occasional special issues on themes such as on research methods in management accounting. Accounting & Finance is essential reading for academics, graduate students and all those interested in research in accounting and finance. The journal is also widely read by practitioners in accounting, corporate finance, investments, and merchant and investment banking.
期刊最新文献
Allocation of decision‐making power and labour income share in listed companies: Evidence from China How do big customers influence bank loans in China? The role of state ownership and political connections ESG, financial constraint and financing activities: A study in the Chinese market Affect and reason in uncertain accounting settings: The case of capital investment appraisal Corporate sexual orientation equality and carbon emission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1