使用图形着色来组织多版本评估

Jonathan Hoseana, Andy Leonardo Louismono, Oriza Stepanus
{"title":"使用图形着色来组织多版本评估","authors":"Jonathan Hoseana, Andy Leonardo Louismono, Oriza Stepanus","doi":"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWe describe and evaluate a method to mitigate unwanted student collaborations in assessments, which we recently implemented in a second-year undergraduate mathematics module. The method requires a list of specific pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating, which we constructed based on the results of previous assessments. We converted the list into an undirected graph – in which vertices represent students and adjacent vertices represent pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating – and determined a proper colouring of this graph. Subsequently, we designed multi-version assessments, the number and the distribution of the versions being as prescribed by the proper colouring. To assess this method's effectiveness, we conducted an anonymous survey collecting the students' opinions. The results showed that the method indeed reduced collaborations, and that it did so more significantly in the case of quizzes than take-home assignments.Keywords: Academic dishonestygraphproper colouringmulti-version assessment AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the module lecturers Iwan Sugiarto, Ari Waworoentoe, and Evelyn Waworoentoe, who took part in creating a supportive environment for the activities reported in this note.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":14026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using graph-colouring to organise multi-version assessments\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Hoseana, Andy Leonardo Louismono, Oriza Stepanus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractWe describe and evaluate a method to mitigate unwanted student collaborations in assessments, which we recently implemented in a second-year undergraduate mathematics module. The method requires a list of specific pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating, which we constructed based on the results of previous assessments. We converted the list into an undirected graph – in which vertices represent students and adjacent vertices represent pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating – and determined a proper colouring of this graph. Subsequently, we designed multi-version assessments, the number and the distribution of the versions being as prescribed by the proper colouring. To assess this method's effectiveness, we conducted an anonymous survey collecting the students' opinions. The results showed that the method indeed reduced collaborations, and that it did so more significantly in the case of quizzes than take-home assignments.Keywords: Academic dishonestygraphproper colouringmulti-version assessment AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the module lecturers Iwan Sugiarto, Ari Waworoentoe, and Evelyn Waworoentoe, who took part in creating a supportive environment for the activities reported in this note.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要我们描述和评估了一种方法,以减少不必要的学生合作评估,我们最近在二年级的本科数学模块实施。该方法需要一个防止合作的特定学生对的列表,这是我们基于先前评估的结果构建的。我们将这个列表转换成一个无向图——其中的顶点代表学生,相邻的顶点代表被阻止合作的学生对——并确定了这个图的适当颜色。随后,我们设计了多版本评估,版本的数量和分布由适当的着色规定。为了评估这种方法的有效性,我们进行了一项匿名调查,收集了学生的意见。结果表明,这种方法确实减少了合作,而且在小测验的情况下比在家庭作业中更明显。作者感谢模块讲师Iwan Sugiarto, Ari Waworoentoe和Evelyn Waworoentoe,他们为本说明中报告的活动创造了一个支持性的环境。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using graph-colouring to organise multi-version assessments
AbstractWe describe and evaluate a method to mitigate unwanted student collaborations in assessments, which we recently implemented in a second-year undergraduate mathematics module. The method requires a list of specific pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating, which we constructed based on the results of previous assessments. We converted the list into an undirected graph – in which vertices represent students and adjacent vertices represent pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating – and determined a proper colouring of this graph. Subsequently, we designed multi-version assessments, the number and the distribution of the versions being as prescribed by the proper colouring. To assess this method's effectiveness, we conducted an anonymous survey collecting the students' opinions. The results showed that the method indeed reduced collaborations, and that it did so more significantly in the case of quizzes than take-home assignments.Keywords: Academic dishonestygraphproper colouringmulti-version assessment AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the module lecturers Iwan Sugiarto, Ari Waworoentoe, and Evelyn Waworoentoe, who took part in creating a supportive environment for the activities reported in this note.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Mathematics is pervading every study and technique in our modern world, bringing ever more sharply into focus the responsibilities laid upon those whose task it is to teach it. Most prominent among these is the difficulty of presenting an interdisciplinary approach so that one professional group may benefit from the experience of others. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology provides a medium by which a wide range of experience in mathematical education can be presented, assimilated and eventually adapted to everyday needs in schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, industry and commerce. Contributions will be welcomed from lecturers, teachers and users of mathematics at all levels on the contents of syllabuses and methods of presentation.
期刊最新文献
  A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Dynamic mathematics Software on K-12 students' mathematics learning Proof exploration using dynamic geometry systems with integrated automated deduction capabilities Fostering preservice teachers’ mathematical discourse through virtual simulation teaching Application of the method of lines to the wave equation for simulating vibrating strings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1