通过使用最近创建的生态毒性数据库定量考虑颗粒特征来估计微塑料的物种敏感性分布

Yuichi Iwasaki, Kazutaka M. Takeshita, Koji Ueda, Wataru Naito
{"title":"通过使用最近创建的生态毒性数据库定量考虑颗粒特征来估计微塑料的物种敏感性分布","authors":"Yuichi Iwasaki, Kazutaka M. Takeshita, Koji Ueda, Wataru Naito","doi":"10.1186/s43591-023-00070-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Estimation of a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) by fitting a statistical distribution to ecotoxicity data is a promising approach to deriving “safe” concentrations for microplastics. However, most existing SSDs do not quantitatively consider the diverse characteristics of microplastics, such as particle size and shape. To address this issue, based on 38 mass-based chronic no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) obtained from a recently created database, we estimated SSDs that quantitatively consider the influences of three types of microplastic characteristics (particle length, shape, and polymer type) and habitat of the test species (freshwater vs. marine) by using Bayesian modeling. We selected the best SSD model among all possible models using the widely applicable information criterion. The best SSD model included particle length (range: 0.05–280 μm) and a binary dummy variable corresponding to the fiber shape. Lower chronic NOECs were associated with decreasing particle size and with toxicity tests that included fibers in this model. Combined with the fact that the null model (i.e., an SSD model with no predictor variable) was ranked 27th among the 64 candidate SSD models, our results support the need to incorporate particle characteristics such as length and shape (e.g., fiber) into estimations of SSDs for microplastics. The medians of the hazardous concentration of 5% of species (HC5) for microplastic spheres and fragments, estimated by the posterior distributions of individual parameters in the best SSD model, ranged from 0.02 to 2 µg/L, depending on the particle length (0.1–100 μm). For microplastic fibers, the HC5 values were estimated to be approximately 100 times lower than those for microplastic spheres and fragments with the same particle length. However, the 95% Bayesian credible intervals for HC5 estimates for fibers were considerable, expanded by up to five orders of magnitude. Despite many remaining challenges, the Bayesian SSD modeling utilized in this study provides unique opportunities to simultaneously investigate the influences of multiple microplastic characteristics on the NOECs of multiple species, which would otherwise be difficult to discern.","PeriodicalId":74190,"journal":{"name":"Microplastics and nanoplastics","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating species sensitivity distributions for microplastics by quantitively considering particle characteristics using a recently created ecotoxicity database\",\"authors\":\"Yuichi Iwasaki, Kazutaka M. Takeshita, Koji Ueda, Wataru Naito\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43591-023-00070-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Estimation of a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) by fitting a statistical distribution to ecotoxicity data is a promising approach to deriving “safe” concentrations for microplastics. However, most existing SSDs do not quantitatively consider the diverse characteristics of microplastics, such as particle size and shape. To address this issue, based on 38 mass-based chronic no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) obtained from a recently created database, we estimated SSDs that quantitatively consider the influences of three types of microplastic characteristics (particle length, shape, and polymer type) and habitat of the test species (freshwater vs. marine) by using Bayesian modeling. We selected the best SSD model among all possible models using the widely applicable information criterion. The best SSD model included particle length (range: 0.05–280 μm) and a binary dummy variable corresponding to the fiber shape. Lower chronic NOECs were associated with decreasing particle size and with toxicity tests that included fibers in this model. Combined with the fact that the null model (i.e., an SSD model with no predictor variable) was ranked 27th among the 64 candidate SSD models, our results support the need to incorporate particle characteristics such as length and shape (e.g., fiber) into estimations of SSDs for microplastics. The medians of the hazardous concentration of 5% of species (HC5) for microplastic spheres and fragments, estimated by the posterior distributions of individual parameters in the best SSD model, ranged from 0.02 to 2 µg/L, depending on the particle length (0.1–100 μm). For microplastic fibers, the HC5 values were estimated to be approximately 100 times lower than those for microplastic spheres and fragments with the same particle length. However, the 95% Bayesian credible intervals for HC5 estimates for fibers were considerable, expanded by up to five orders of magnitude. Despite many remaining challenges, the Bayesian SSD modeling utilized in this study provides unique opportunities to simultaneously investigate the influences of multiple microplastic characteristics on the NOECs of multiple species, which would otherwise be difficult to discern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microplastics and nanoplastics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microplastics and nanoplastics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00070-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microplastics and nanoplastics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00070-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过拟合生态毒性数据的统计分布来估计物种敏感性分布(SSD)是一种很有前途的方法,可以获得微塑料的“安全”浓度。然而,大多数现有的固态硬盘并没有定量地考虑微塑料的各种特性,如粒度和形状。为了解决这一问题,基于从最近创建的数据库中获得的38个基于质量的慢性无观察效应浓度(noec),我们使用贝叶斯模型估计了固态硬盘,定量考虑了三种微塑性特征(颗粒长度、形状和聚合物类型)和测试物种栖息地(淡水与海洋)的影响。我们使用广泛适用的信息标准从所有可能的模型中选择最佳的SSD模型。最佳SSD模型包括颗粒长度(范围:0.05 ~ 280 μm)和与纤维形状对应的二元虚拟变量。较低的慢性noec与颗粒尺寸减小以及在该模型中包括纤维的毒性试验有关。结合零模型(即没有预测变量的SSD模型)在64个候选SSD模型中排名第27位的事实,我们的结果支持将颗粒特征(如长度和形状(如纤维))纳入微塑料SSD的估计中。根据最佳SSD模型中单个参数的后验分布估计,微塑料球体和碎片5%物种(HC5)的危险浓度中位数在0.02 ~ 2µg/L之间,取决于颗粒长度(0.1 ~ 100 μm)。对于微塑料纤维,HC5值估计比相同颗粒长度的微塑料球体和碎片的HC5值低约100倍。然而,纤维的HC5估计的95%贝叶斯可信区间相当可观,扩大了多达五个数量级。尽管仍存在许多挑战,但本研究中使用的贝叶斯固态硬盘模型提供了独特的机会,可以同时研究多种微塑性特征对多种物种noec的影响,否则这些影响将难以辨别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating species sensitivity distributions for microplastics by quantitively considering particle characteristics using a recently created ecotoxicity database
Abstract Estimation of a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) by fitting a statistical distribution to ecotoxicity data is a promising approach to deriving “safe” concentrations for microplastics. However, most existing SSDs do not quantitatively consider the diverse characteristics of microplastics, such as particle size and shape. To address this issue, based on 38 mass-based chronic no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) obtained from a recently created database, we estimated SSDs that quantitatively consider the influences of three types of microplastic characteristics (particle length, shape, and polymer type) and habitat of the test species (freshwater vs. marine) by using Bayesian modeling. We selected the best SSD model among all possible models using the widely applicable information criterion. The best SSD model included particle length (range: 0.05–280 μm) and a binary dummy variable corresponding to the fiber shape. Lower chronic NOECs were associated with decreasing particle size and with toxicity tests that included fibers in this model. Combined with the fact that the null model (i.e., an SSD model with no predictor variable) was ranked 27th among the 64 candidate SSD models, our results support the need to incorporate particle characteristics such as length and shape (e.g., fiber) into estimations of SSDs for microplastics. The medians of the hazardous concentration of 5% of species (HC5) for microplastic spheres and fragments, estimated by the posterior distributions of individual parameters in the best SSD model, ranged from 0.02 to 2 µg/L, depending on the particle length (0.1–100 μm). For microplastic fibers, the HC5 values were estimated to be approximately 100 times lower than those for microplastic spheres and fragments with the same particle length. However, the 95% Bayesian credible intervals for HC5 estimates for fibers were considerable, expanded by up to five orders of magnitude. Despite many remaining challenges, the Bayesian SSD modeling utilized in this study provides unique opportunities to simultaneously investigate the influences of multiple microplastic characteristics on the NOECs of multiple species, which would otherwise be difficult to discern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vertical movement of microplastics by roots of wheat plant (Triticum aestivum) and the plant response in sandy soil Informing the Plastic Treaty negotiations on science - experiences from the Scientists’ Coalition for an Effective Plastic Treaty Impacts of micro- and nanoplastics on early-life health: a roadmap towards risk assessment Use of metal-tagged environmentally representative micro- and nanoplastic particles to investigate transport and retention through porous media using single particle ICP-MS Unravelling protein corona formation on pristine and leached microplastics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1