与抗凝剂相比,WATCHMAN减少中风的论文分析:文献的系统回顾

Christopher Miller, Rawan Sharari, Munira Ali, Jonathan Omana, Mirjana Milutinovic, Aleksandar Dusic
{"title":"与抗凝剂相比,WATCHMAN减少中风的论文分析:文献的系统回顾","authors":"Christopher Miller, Rawan Sharari, Munira Ali, Jonathan Omana, Mirjana Milutinovic, Aleksandar Dusic","doi":"10.4236/ojim.2023.133024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Anticoagulants have been approved and used for decades as highly effective blood thinners. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical trials in order to determine if the Watchman reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those prescribed the traditional anticoagulants. This will contribute to the current body of knowledge and possibly provide beneficial clinical guidance with respect to providing an alternative option for those suffering from non-valvular Atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic literature search through the Saint James School of Medicine library resources as well as PubMed, Medscape, Google Scholar was conducted. Studies were included if the literature examined the comparison between the Watchman device and four specific anticoagulants (Xarelto, Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Warfarin) in association with reduction of risks of strokes in an atrial fibrillation population. The study includes a qualitative sub-analysis to explore additional clinical aspects that may affect risk of stroke and response of treatment. Results: Outcomes were significant for similar stroke occurrence, when compared to published clinical trials. Alternatively, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality in the Watchman™ device compared to traditional NOACs and warfarin. While examining the studies and trials, overall, the Watchman™ device offers a better long-term outcome therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation populations who are not possibilities for extended anticoagulation. The studies used for analysis examining the dosage found higher fatality with increased use of NOACs and more hospitalizations with decreased use. Conclusion: From the presented data, it is safe to say that the Watchman™ device is a viable and effective alternative for stroke prophylaxis in certain patient populations. Compared to traditional anticoagulant therapies for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, these studies suggest that the Watchman™ device can reduce bleeding time and, in most cases, the risk of stroke is less than or equal to traditional anti-coagulants.","PeriodicalId":19579,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paper Analysis of the WATCHMAN on the Reduction of Stroke Compared to Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Miller, Rawan Sharari, Munira Ali, Jonathan Omana, Mirjana Milutinovic, Aleksandar Dusic\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojim.2023.133024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Anticoagulants have been approved and used for decades as highly effective blood thinners. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical trials in order to determine if the Watchman reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those prescribed the traditional anticoagulants. This will contribute to the current body of knowledge and possibly provide beneficial clinical guidance with respect to providing an alternative option for those suffering from non-valvular Atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic literature search through the Saint James School of Medicine library resources as well as PubMed, Medscape, Google Scholar was conducted. Studies were included if the literature examined the comparison between the Watchman device and four specific anticoagulants (Xarelto, Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Warfarin) in association with reduction of risks of strokes in an atrial fibrillation population. The study includes a qualitative sub-analysis to explore additional clinical aspects that may affect risk of stroke and response of treatment. Results: Outcomes were significant for similar stroke occurrence, when compared to published clinical trials. Alternatively, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality in the Watchman™ device compared to traditional NOACs and warfarin. While examining the studies and trials, overall, the Watchman™ device offers a better long-term outcome therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation populations who are not possibilities for extended anticoagulation. The studies used for analysis examining the dosage found higher fatality with increased use of NOACs and more hospitalizations with decreased use. Conclusion: From the presented data, it is safe to say that the Watchman™ device is a viable and effective alternative for stroke prophylaxis in certain patient populations. Compared to traditional anticoagulant therapies for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, these studies suggest that the Watchman™ device can reduce bleeding time and, in most cases, the risk of stroke is less than or equal to traditional anti-coagulants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojim.2023.133024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojim.2023.133024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抗凝剂作为高效的血液稀释剂已经被批准和使用了几十年。本研究的目的是分析临床试验,以确定与传统抗凝剂相比,Watchman是否能降低房颤患者中风的风险。这将有助于现有的知识体系,并可能提供有益的临床指导,为那些患有非瓣膜性心房颤动的患者提供另一种选择。方法:通过圣詹姆斯医学院图书馆资源以及PubMed、Medscape、Google Scholar进行系统的文献检索。如果文献检查Watchman装置与四种特定抗凝剂(Xarelto, Eliquis, Pradaxa和Warfarin)与房颤人群卒中风险降低的相关性比较,则纳入研究。该研究包括定性亚分析,以探索可能影响中风风险和治疗反应的其他临床方面。结果:与已发表的临床试验相比,类似卒中发生的结果具有显著性。另外,与传统noac和华法林相比,Watchman™装置的出血风险和全因死亡率显著降低。在检查研究和试验时,总体而言,Watchman™设备为无法延长抗凝治疗的非瓣膜性房颤人群提供了更好的长期疗效治疗。用于分析检查剂量的研究发现,noac使用增加致死率更高,使用减少住院率更高。结论:从目前的数据来看,可以肯定地说Watchman™装置在某些患者群体中是一种可行且有效的卒中预防替代方案。与非瓣膜性心房颤动的传统抗凝治疗相比,这些研究表明Watchman™装置可以缩短出血时间,并且在大多数情况下,卒中的风险小于或等于传统抗凝药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paper Analysis of the WATCHMAN on the Reduction of Stroke Compared to Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Objective: Anticoagulants have been approved and used for decades as highly effective blood thinners. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical trials in order to determine if the Watchman reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those prescribed the traditional anticoagulants. This will contribute to the current body of knowledge and possibly provide beneficial clinical guidance with respect to providing an alternative option for those suffering from non-valvular Atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic literature search through the Saint James School of Medicine library resources as well as PubMed, Medscape, Google Scholar was conducted. Studies were included if the literature examined the comparison between the Watchman device and four specific anticoagulants (Xarelto, Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Warfarin) in association with reduction of risks of strokes in an atrial fibrillation population. The study includes a qualitative sub-analysis to explore additional clinical aspects that may affect risk of stroke and response of treatment. Results: Outcomes were significant for similar stroke occurrence, when compared to published clinical trials. Alternatively, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality in the Watchman™ device compared to traditional NOACs and warfarin. While examining the studies and trials, overall, the Watchman™ device offers a better long-term outcome therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation populations who are not possibilities for extended anticoagulation. The studies used for analysis examining the dosage found higher fatality with increased use of NOACs and more hospitalizations with decreased use. Conclusion: From the presented data, it is safe to say that the Watchman™ device is a viable and effective alternative for stroke prophylaxis in certain patient populations. Compared to traditional anticoagulant therapies for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, these studies suggest that the Watchman™ device can reduce bleeding time and, in most cases, the risk of stroke is less than or equal to traditional anti-coagulants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lower Limb Arteriopathy in Diabetics at the Oueme-Plateau Provincial Hospital in Porto-Novo: Frequency and Associated Factors Biochemical Profile of Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 at the Infectious Disease Management Centre in Lomé in 2020 Blood Count Abnormalities Associated with Death in Patients Infected with SARS-COV-2 at the Ziguinchor EpidemicTreatment Center (ETC) Prolactin Adenomas in Senegal: Epidemiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects of 89 Cases Biermer’s Disease at the Donka National Hospital in Guinea<br/>—Epidemio-Clinical, Therapeutic and Evolutionary Aspect in the Internal Medicine Department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1