Christopher Miller, Rawan Sharari, Munira Ali, Jonathan Omana, Mirjana Milutinovic, Aleksandar Dusic
{"title":"与抗凝剂相比,WATCHMAN减少中风的论文分析:文献的系统回顾","authors":"Christopher Miller, Rawan Sharari, Munira Ali, Jonathan Omana, Mirjana Milutinovic, Aleksandar Dusic","doi":"10.4236/ojim.2023.133024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Anticoagulants have been approved and used for decades as highly effective blood thinners. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical trials in order to determine if the Watchman reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those prescribed the traditional anticoagulants. This will contribute to the current body of knowledge and possibly provide beneficial clinical guidance with respect to providing an alternative option for those suffering from non-valvular Atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic literature search through the Saint James School of Medicine library resources as well as PubMed, Medscape, Google Scholar was conducted. Studies were included if the literature examined the comparison between the Watchman device and four specific anticoagulants (Xarelto, Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Warfarin) in association with reduction of risks of strokes in an atrial fibrillation population. The study includes a qualitative sub-analysis to explore additional clinical aspects that may affect risk of stroke and response of treatment. Results: Outcomes were significant for similar stroke occurrence, when compared to published clinical trials. Alternatively, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality in the Watchman™ device compared to traditional NOACs and warfarin. While examining the studies and trials, overall, the Watchman™ device offers a better long-term outcome therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation populations who are not possibilities for extended anticoagulation. The studies used for analysis examining the dosage found higher fatality with increased use of NOACs and more hospitalizations with decreased use. Conclusion: From the presented data, it is safe to say that the Watchman™ device is a viable and effective alternative for stroke prophylaxis in certain patient populations. Compared to traditional anticoagulant therapies for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, these studies suggest that the Watchman™ device can reduce bleeding time and, in most cases, the risk of stroke is less than or equal to traditional anti-coagulants.","PeriodicalId":19579,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paper Analysis of the WATCHMAN on the Reduction of Stroke Compared to Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Miller, Rawan Sharari, Munira Ali, Jonathan Omana, Mirjana Milutinovic, Aleksandar Dusic\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojim.2023.133024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Anticoagulants have been approved and used for decades as highly effective blood thinners. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical trials in order to determine if the Watchman reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those prescribed the traditional anticoagulants. This will contribute to the current body of knowledge and possibly provide beneficial clinical guidance with respect to providing an alternative option for those suffering from non-valvular Atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic literature search through the Saint James School of Medicine library resources as well as PubMed, Medscape, Google Scholar was conducted. Studies were included if the literature examined the comparison between the Watchman device and four specific anticoagulants (Xarelto, Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Warfarin) in association with reduction of risks of strokes in an atrial fibrillation population. The study includes a qualitative sub-analysis to explore additional clinical aspects that may affect risk of stroke and response of treatment. Results: Outcomes were significant for similar stroke occurrence, when compared to published clinical trials. Alternatively, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality in the Watchman™ device compared to traditional NOACs and warfarin. While examining the studies and trials, overall, the Watchman™ device offers a better long-term outcome therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation populations who are not possibilities for extended anticoagulation. The studies used for analysis examining the dosage found higher fatality with increased use of NOACs and more hospitalizations with decreased use. Conclusion: From the presented data, it is safe to say that the Watchman™ device is a viable and effective alternative for stroke prophylaxis in certain patient populations. Compared to traditional anticoagulant therapies for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, these studies suggest that the Watchman™ device can reduce bleeding time and, in most cases, the risk of stroke is less than or equal to traditional anti-coagulants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojim.2023.133024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojim.2023.133024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Paper Analysis of the WATCHMAN on the Reduction of Stroke Compared to Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Objective: Anticoagulants have been approved and used for decades as highly effective blood thinners. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical trials in order to determine if the Watchman reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those prescribed the traditional anticoagulants. This will contribute to the current body of knowledge and possibly provide beneficial clinical guidance with respect to providing an alternative option for those suffering from non-valvular Atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic literature search through the Saint James School of Medicine library resources as well as PubMed, Medscape, Google Scholar was conducted. Studies were included if the literature examined the comparison between the Watchman device and four specific anticoagulants (Xarelto, Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Warfarin) in association with reduction of risks of strokes in an atrial fibrillation population. The study includes a qualitative sub-analysis to explore additional clinical aspects that may affect risk of stroke and response of treatment. Results: Outcomes were significant for similar stroke occurrence, when compared to published clinical trials. Alternatively, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality in the Watchman™ device compared to traditional NOACs and warfarin. While examining the studies and trials, overall, the Watchman™ device offers a better long-term outcome therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation populations who are not possibilities for extended anticoagulation. The studies used for analysis examining the dosage found higher fatality with increased use of NOACs and more hospitalizations with decreased use. Conclusion: From the presented data, it is safe to say that the Watchman™ device is a viable and effective alternative for stroke prophylaxis in certain patient populations. Compared to traditional anticoagulant therapies for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, these studies suggest that the Watchman™ device can reduce bleeding time and, in most cases, the risk of stroke is less than or equal to traditional anti-coagulants.