75岁以上择期结直肠癌手术的老年患者术后增强恢复(ERAS)项目

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Surgical Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1111/1744-1633.12661
Dorothy Sze Wing Hung, Colin Wai Ho Chu, Kam Hung Kwok
{"title":"75岁以上择期结直肠癌手术的老年患者术后增强恢复(ERAS)项目","authors":"Dorothy Sze Wing Hung,&nbsp;Colin Wai Ho Chu,&nbsp;Kam Hung Kwok","doi":"10.1111/1744-1633.12661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has been well established for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, there has been a lack of studies on its use for elderly patients. Our unit implemented the ERAS program in September 2018. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of the ERAS program in patients over 75 years who are undergoing colorectal surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective study, we compared all patients aged 75 and above who were admitted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital for elective colorectal cancer surgery before the implementation of the ERAS program (1 January 2016 to 31 August 2018) with those treated after its implementation (1 April 2019 to March 2022). The primary end point was the post-operative length of stay. The secondary end points were wound infection, retention of urine, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, use of total parenteral nutrition, acute coronary syndrome, blood transfusion, reoperation, in-hospital mortality, unplanned readmission within 28 days and Clinical Fragility Score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 258 patients were included. The median length of stay was 8.4 days in the pre-ERAS group vs 6.8 days in the ERAS group. In-patient death (1.4% in the pre-ERAS group vs 0.9% in the ERAS group) and readmission rate (7.7% in the pre-ERAS group vs 12.2% in the ERAS group) were similar between the two groups. About 31.5% of patients in the pre-ERAS group had higher Clinical Fragility Scale post-operatively as compared with 7.8% in the ERAS group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The ERAS program shortened the length of hospital stay by 1.6 days, and patients had lower Clinical Fragility Scale post-operatively. Adverse events were not increased. The ERAS program can be safely applied to elderly patients with colorectal cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51190,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Practice","volume":"27 4","pages":"226-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The enhanced recovery after surgery program in elderly patients over 75 years of age undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery\",\"authors\":\"Dorothy Sze Wing Hung,&nbsp;Colin Wai Ho Chu,&nbsp;Kam Hung Kwok\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-1633.12661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has been well established for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, there has been a lack of studies on its use for elderly patients. Our unit implemented the ERAS program in September 2018. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of the ERAS program in patients over 75 years who are undergoing colorectal surgery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this retrospective study, we compared all patients aged 75 and above who were admitted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital for elective colorectal cancer surgery before the implementation of the ERAS program (1 January 2016 to 31 August 2018) with those treated after its implementation (1 April 2019 to March 2022). The primary end point was the post-operative length of stay. The secondary end points were wound infection, retention of urine, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, use of total parenteral nutrition, acute coronary syndrome, blood transfusion, reoperation, in-hospital mortality, unplanned readmission within 28 days and Clinical Fragility Score.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 258 patients were included. The median length of stay was 8.4 days in the pre-ERAS group vs 6.8 days in the ERAS group. In-patient death (1.4% in the pre-ERAS group vs 0.9% in the ERAS group) and readmission rate (7.7% in the pre-ERAS group vs 12.2% in the ERAS group) were similar between the two groups. About 31.5% of patients in the pre-ERAS group had higher Clinical Fragility Scale post-operatively as compared with 7.8% in the ERAS group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The ERAS program shortened the length of hospital stay by 1.6 days, and patients had lower Clinical Fragility Scale post-operatively. Adverse events were not increased. The ERAS program can be safely applied to elderly patients with colorectal cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"226-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12661\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】目的结肠直肠手术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案已经建立。然而,关于其在老年患者中的应用的研究一直缺乏。我们单位于2018年9月实施了ERAS计划。本研究的目的是评估ERAS项目在75岁以上接受结直肠手术的患者中的效果。患者和方法在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了在ERAS计划实施前(2016年1月1日至2018年8月31日)和实施后(2019年4月1日至2022年3月)在伊丽莎白女王医院接受选择性结直肠癌手术的所有75岁及以上患者。主要终点为术后住院时间。次要终点为伤口感染、尿潴留、肺炎、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、全肠外营养的使用、急性冠状动脉综合征、输血、再手术、院内死亡率、28天内意外再入院和临床脆弱性评分。结果共纳入258例患者。ERAS前组的中位住院时间为8.4天,ERAS组为6.8天。两组患者的死亡率(ERAS前组为1.4%,ERAS组为0.9%)和再入院率(ERAS前组为7.7%,ERAS组为12.2%)相似。ERAS前组约31.5%的患者术后临床脆性评分较高,而ERAS组为7.8%。结论ERAS方案使患者住院时间缩短1.6 d,患者术后临床脆弱性评分较低。不良事件没有增加。ERAS项目可以安全地应用于老年结直肠癌患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The enhanced recovery after surgery program in elderly patients over 75 years of age undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery

Aim

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has been well established for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, there has been a lack of studies on its use for elderly patients. Our unit implemented the ERAS program in September 2018. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of the ERAS program in patients over 75 years who are undergoing colorectal surgery.

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective study, we compared all patients aged 75 and above who were admitted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital for elective colorectal cancer surgery before the implementation of the ERAS program (1 January 2016 to 31 August 2018) with those treated after its implementation (1 April 2019 to March 2022). The primary end point was the post-operative length of stay. The secondary end points were wound infection, retention of urine, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, use of total parenteral nutrition, acute coronary syndrome, blood transfusion, reoperation, in-hospital mortality, unplanned readmission within 28 days and Clinical Fragility Score.

Results

A total of 258 patients were included. The median length of stay was 8.4 days in the pre-ERAS group vs 6.8 days in the ERAS group. In-patient death (1.4% in the pre-ERAS group vs 0.9% in the ERAS group) and readmission rate (7.7% in the pre-ERAS group vs 12.2% in the ERAS group) were similar between the two groups. About 31.5% of patients in the pre-ERAS group had higher Clinical Fragility Scale post-operatively as compared with 7.8% in the ERAS group.

Conclusion

The ERAS program shortened the length of hospital stay by 1.6 days, and patients had lower Clinical Fragility Scale post-operatively. Adverse events were not increased. The ERAS program can be safely applied to elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Practice
Surgical Practice 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Practice is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal, which is dedicated to the art and science of advances in clinical practice and research in surgery. Surgical Practice publishes papers in all fields of surgery and surgery-related disciplines. It consists of sections of history, leading articles, reviews, original papers, discussion papers, education, case reports, short notes on surgical techniques and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Author Index Full Oral Short oral Motion picture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1