{"title":"诊断为心内超声病灶的胎儿心脏异常的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Amar Taksande, Patel Zeeshan Jameel, Rupesh Rao, Bharati Taksande, Sachin Damke","doi":"10.32598/jpr.11.3.1110.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The exact prevalence of cardiac anomalies in diagnosed cases of echogenic foci is still unknown, as various studies have been carried out across multiple populations with different methodologies. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine the precise prevalence of cardiac anomalies found in cases with intracardiac echogenic foci. Methods: The authors manually searched the electronic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science). Two reviewers independently did data extraction and quality control; a third reviewer resolved any raised conflicts. The data were analyzed by comprehensive meta-analysis software version 2. Risk of bias assessment and strobe checklist were used for quality assessment. Results: Out of 531 articles identified, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis with a total sample size of 7568. The pooled prevalence of cardiac anomalies in the fetuses with intracardiac echogenic foci was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.6%-6.4%). Subgroup analysis was done according to the geographical distribution of cases, maternal age, gestational age, year of publication, risk of bias, and ultrasonography operator. Conclusions: The current study represents the first and only meta-analysis concerning the prevalence of cardiac anomaly in fetuses diagnosed with intracardiac echogenic focus (ICEF). This study supports a definitive relationship between ICEF and underlying congenital heart disease. We recommend increased training of individuals performing this ultrasonography to improve early detection, ultimately enhancing the care given to infants immediately post-birth.","PeriodicalId":43059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Cardiac Anomalies in Fetuses Diagnosed With Intracardiac Echogenic Foci: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Amar Taksande, Patel Zeeshan Jameel, Rupesh Rao, Bharati Taksande, Sachin Damke\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/jpr.11.3.1110.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The exact prevalence of cardiac anomalies in diagnosed cases of echogenic foci is still unknown, as various studies have been carried out across multiple populations with different methodologies. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine the precise prevalence of cardiac anomalies found in cases with intracardiac echogenic foci. Methods: The authors manually searched the electronic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science). Two reviewers independently did data extraction and quality control; a third reviewer resolved any raised conflicts. The data were analyzed by comprehensive meta-analysis software version 2. Risk of bias assessment and strobe checklist were used for quality assessment. Results: Out of 531 articles identified, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis with a total sample size of 7568. The pooled prevalence of cardiac anomalies in the fetuses with intracardiac echogenic foci was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.6%-6.4%). Subgroup analysis was done according to the geographical distribution of cases, maternal age, gestational age, year of publication, risk of bias, and ultrasonography operator. Conclusions: The current study represents the first and only meta-analysis concerning the prevalence of cardiac anomaly in fetuses diagnosed with intracardiac echogenic focus (ICEF). This study supports a definitive relationship between ICEF and underlying congenital heart disease. We recommend increased training of individuals performing this ultrasonography to improve early detection, ultimately enhancing the care given to infants immediately post-birth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatrics Review\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatrics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/jpr.11.3.1110.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jpr.11.3.1110.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在超声病灶诊断病例中,心脏异常的确切患病率仍然未知,因为各种研究已经在不同方法的多个人群中进行。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定心内超声灶病例中发现的心脏异常的确切患病率。方法:人工检索电子数据库(Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science)。两名审稿人独立进行数据提取和质量控制;第三位审稿人解决了任何产生的冲突。采用综合meta分析软件version 2对数据进行分析。采用偏倚风险评估和频闪检查表进行质量评估。结果:在531篇文章中,32篇研究符合纳入标准,被纳入meta分析,总样本量为7568。伴有心内超声病灶的胎儿心脏异常的总发生率为4.8% (95% CI, 3.6%-6.4%)。根据病例的地理分布、产妇年龄、胎龄、发表年份、偏倚风险和超声检查操作人员进行亚组分析。结论:目前的研究是第一个也是唯一一个关于诊断为心内回声病灶(ICEF)的胎儿心脏异常患病率的荟萃分析。本研究支持ICEF与潜在先天性心脏病之间的明确关系。我们建议加强对个人进行超声检查的培训,以提高早期发现,最终提高对婴儿出生后立即的护理。
Prevalence of Cardiac Anomalies in Fetuses Diagnosed With Intracardiac Echogenic Foci: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Objectives: The exact prevalence of cardiac anomalies in diagnosed cases of echogenic foci is still unknown, as various studies have been carried out across multiple populations with different methodologies. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine the precise prevalence of cardiac anomalies found in cases with intracardiac echogenic foci. Methods: The authors manually searched the electronic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science). Two reviewers independently did data extraction and quality control; a third reviewer resolved any raised conflicts. The data were analyzed by comprehensive meta-analysis software version 2. Risk of bias assessment and strobe checklist were used for quality assessment. Results: Out of 531 articles identified, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis with a total sample size of 7568. The pooled prevalence of cardiac anomalies in the fetuses with intracardiac echogenic foci was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.6%-6.4%). Subgroup analysis was done according to the geographical distribution of cases, maternal age, gestational age, year of publication, risk of bias, and ultrasonography operator. Conclusions: The current study represents the first and only meta-analysis concerning the prevalence of cardiac anomaly in fetuses diagnosed with intracardiac echogenic focus (ICEF). This study supports a definitive relationship between ICEF and underlying congenital heart disease. We recommend increased training of individuals performing this ultrasonography to improve early detection, ultimately enhancing the care given to infants immediately post-birth.