直立体位对初级卫生保健机构产妇分娩过程和结局的影响

Auwalu Muhammed, Hannatu Sarki Habibu, Abdullahi Haruna Ibrahim, Idris Abdulrashid
{"title":"直立体位对初级卫生保健机构产妇分娩过程和结局的影响","authors":"Auwalu Muhammed, Hannatu Sarki Habibu, Abdullahi Haruna Ibrahim, Idris Abdulrashid","doi":"10.1177/0974150x231195178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The position of the woman during labour is an essential part of maternal care, but some care providers often neglect it. There are also some recommended birthing positions, but there is a lack of data on how midwives translate the findings into practice. Objective This study aimed to compare upright and supine births concerning the birth process and outcomes among women who have given birth in primary health care settings. Material and Methods This is a quantitative comparative study among parturient in primary health care setting. An observational checklist was used as a data collection tool. A total of 40 parturient (20 each for upright and recumbent position groups) were selected as the study participants. Data were analysed using an independent t-test and chi-square test. Results Findings indicated that although the uterus contracts more frequent in an upright position, there was no substantial difference between the groups concerning the progress of labour ( p > .05). However, findings suggested that the upright position is associated with a shorter duration in the third stage of labour compared to the recumbent position ( p < .05). Blood lost was <500 mils for 75% of the upright position and 55% of the recumbent position group ( p = .054). Conclusion Upright position may shorten the duration of the third stage of labour (compared to recumbent position) among parturients. Hence, midwives can utilise the upright/vertical protocol during their practice to ensure better outcome of the labour and minimise blood loss for the parturient.","PeriodicalId":272374,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Upright Positioning on the Process and Outcome of Labour Among Parturient in Primary Health Care Setting\",\"authors\":\"Auwalu Muhammed, Hannatu Sarki Habibu, Abdullahi Haruna Ibrahim, Idris Abdulrashid\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0974150x231195178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The position of the woman during labour is an essential part of maternal care, but some care providers often neglect it. There are also some recommended birthing positions, but there is a lack of data on how midwives translate the findings into practice. Objective This study aimed to compare upright and supine births concerning the birth process and outcomes among women who have given birth in primary health care settings. Material and Methods This is a quantitative comparative study among parturient in primary health care setting. An observational checklist was used as a data collection tool. A total of 40 parturient (20 each for upright and recumbent position groups) were selected as the study participants. Data were analysed using an independent t-test and chi-square test. Results Findings indicated that although the uterus contracts more frequent in an upright position, there was no substantial difference between the groups concerning the progress of labour ( p > .05). However, findings suggested that the upright position is associated with a shorter duration in the third stage of labour compared to the recumbent position ( p < .05). Blood lost was <500 mils for 75% of the upright position and 55% of the recumbent position group ( p = .054). Conclusion Upright position may shorten the duration of the third stage of labour (compared to recumbent position) among parturients. Hence, midwives can utilise the upright/vertical protocol during their practice to ensure better outcome of the labour and minimise blood loss for the parturient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974150x231195178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974150x231195178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍妇女的位置在劳动力是一个重要的组成部分,孕产妇保健,但一些保健提供者常常忽视它。也有一些推荐的分娩姿势,但缺乏关于助产士如何将这些发现转化为实践的数据。目的本研究旨在比较在初级卫生保健机构分娩的妇女中直立和仰卧分娩的分娩过程和结果。材料与方法本研究是一项针对初级卫生保健环境中产妇的定量比较研究。使用观察性检查表作为数据收集工具。选取40例产妇作为研究对象,其中卧位组和直立组各20例。数据分析采用独立t检验和卡方检验。结果结果表明,虽然子宫在直立体位时收缩更频繁,但两组之间在分娩进程方面没有实质性差异(p >. 05)。然而,研究结果表明,与平躺姿势相比,直立姿势在分娩第三阶段的持续时间更短(p <. 05)。75%的直立姿势组和55%的平卧姿势组的失血量为500毫升(p = 0.054)。结论与平卧位相比,直立位可缩短产妇第三产程时间。因此,助产士可以利用/垂直协议正直的人在他们的实践,以确保更好的结果的劳动力和减少产妇失血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Upright Positioning on the Process and Outcome of Labour Among Parturient in Primary Health Care Setting
Introduction The position of the woman during labour is an essential part of maternal care, but some care providers often neglect it. There are also some recommended birthing positions, but there is a lack of data on how midwives translate the findings into practice. Objective This study aimed to compare upright and supine births concerning the birth process and outcomes among women who have given birth in primary health care settings. Material and Methods This is a quantitative comparative study among parturient in primary health care setting. An observational checklist was used as a data collection tool. A total of 40 parturient (20 each for upright and recumbent position groups) were selected as the study participants. Data were analysed using an independent t-test and chi-square test. Results Findings indicated that although the uterus contracts more frequent in an upright position, there was no substantial difference between the groups concerning the progress of labour ( p > .05). However, findings suggested that the upright position is associated with a shorter duration in the third stage of labour compared to the recumbent position ( p < .05). Blood lost was <500 mils for 75% of the upright position and 55% of the recumbent position group ( p = .054). Conclusion Upright position may shorten the duration of the third stage of labour (compared to recumbent position) among parturients. Hence, midwives can utilise the upright/vertical protocol during their practice to ensure better outcome of the labour and minimise blood loss for the parturient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Nurses Caring for Children Under Five Years with Burns at a Teaching Hospital in Ghana Distribution of Lifestyle Risk Factors and Biophysical/Biochemical Parameters Related to NCD Prevention Among Nurses in Selected Government Hospitals of Chandigarh, India (2020–2022): A Multicentered Cross-sectional Study Effect of Upright Positioning on the Process and Outcome of Labour Among Parturient in Primary Health Care Setting Barriers and Facilitators Related to Nasal Injury Among Preterm Neonates in Selected Neonatal Units of a Tertiary Care Centre, North India A Study to Assess the Knowledge Regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Among Staff of Ambulance, Equipped Status of Ambulances, and their Utilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1