令人难忘的开始,但令人难忘的结局:内在的可记忆性改变了我们对时间的主观体验

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL VISUAL COGNITION Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1080/13506285.2023.2268382
Madeline Gedvila, Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Wilma A. Bainbridge
{"title":"令人难忘的开始,但令人难忘的结局:内在的可记忆性改变了我们对时间的主观体验","authors":"Madeline Gedvila, Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Wilma A. Bainbridge","doi":"10.1080/13506285.2023.2268382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTTime is the fabric of experience – yet it is incredibly malleable in the mind of the observer: seeming to drag on, or fly right by at different moments. One of the most influential drivers of temporal distortions is attention, where heightened attention dilates subjective time. But an equally important feature of subjective experience involves not just the objects of attention, but also what information will naturally be remembered or forgotten, independent of attention (i.e., intrinsic image memorability). Here we test how memorability influences time perception. Observers viewed scenes in an oddball paradigm, where the last scene could be a forgettable “oddball” amidst memorable ones, or vice versa. Subjective time dilation occurred only for forgettable oddballs, but not memorable ones – demonstrating an oddball effect where the oddball did not differ in low-level visual features, image category, or even subjective memorability. But more importantly, these results emphasize how memory can interact with temporal experience: memorable beginnings may put people in an efficient encoding state, which may in turn influence which moments are dilated in time.KEYWORDS: Time perceptiontime dilationoddball effectmemorabilityscene perception Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Author contributionsMG, JDKO, and WAB designed the research and wrote the manuscript. MG and JDKO conducted the experiments and analyzed the data with input from WAB.Open practicesAll data will be available in the Supplementary Raw Data Archive included with this submission, and via OSF: https://osf.io/dkxez/?view_only=38c7d6db309d49219360b21c41b431d2.Additional informationFundingMG was funded by the University of Chicago Metcalf Research Internship in Neuroscience. WAB is supported by the National Eye Institute (R01-EY034432). For helpful comments, we thank the members of the Brain Bridge Lab.","PeriodicalId":47961,"journal":{"name":"VISUAL COGNITION","volume":"8 32","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memorable beginnings, but forgettable endings: Intrinsic memorability alters our subjective experience of time\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Gedvila, Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Wilma A. Bainbridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13506285.2023.2268382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTTime is the fabric of experience – yet it is incredibly malleable in the mind of the observer: seeming to drag on, or fly right by at different moments. One of the most influential drivers of temporal distortions is attention, where heightened attention dilates subjective time. But an equally important feature of subjective experience involves not just the objects of attention, but also what information will naturally be remembered or forgotten, independent of attention (i.e., intrinsic image memorability). Here we test how memorability influences time perception. Observers viewed scenes in an oddball paradigm, where the last scene could be a forgettable “oddball” amidst memorable ones, or vice versa. Subjective time dilation occurred only for forgettable oddballs, but not memorable ones – demonstrating an oddball effect where the oddball did not differ in low-level visual features, image category, or even subjective memorability. But more importantly, these results emphasize how memory can interact with temporal experience: memorable beginnings may put people in an efficient encoding state, which may in turn influence which moments are dilated in time.KEYWORDS: Time perceptiontime dilationoddball effectmemorabilityscene perception Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Author contributionsMG, JDKO, and WAB designed the research and wrote the manuscript. MG and JDKO conducted the experiments and analyzed the data with input from WAB.Open practicesAll data will be available in the Supplementary Raw Data Archive included with this submission, and via OSF: https://osf.io/dkxez/?view_only=38c7d6db309d49219360b21c41b431d2.Additional informationFundingMG was funded by the University of Chicago Metcalf Research Internship in Neuroscience. WAB is supported by the National Eye Institute (R01-EY034432). For helpful comments, we thank the members of the Brain Bridge Lab.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VISUAL COGNITION\",\"volume\":\"8 32\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VISUAL COGNITION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2023.2268382\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VISUAL COGNITION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2023.2268382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】时间是经验的结构——然而它在观察者的头脑中具有难以置信的可塑性:似乎在不同的时刻拖着,或者飞过去。时间扭曲最具影响力的驱动因素之一是注意力,高度的注意力会扩大主观时间。但是,主观经验的一个同样重要的特征不仅涉及注意的对象,还涉及独立于注意的信息自然会被记住或遗忘(即内在图像记忆)。在这里,我们测试记忆如何影响时间感知。观察者以一种古怪的范式观看场景,最后一个场景可能是令人难忘的场景中一个容易被遗忘的“古怪”,反之亦然。主观时间膨胀只发生在容易忘记的怪人身上,而不发生在容易记住的人身上——这证明了一个怪人效应,怪人在低级视觉特征、图像类别甚至主观记忆方面都没有区别。但更重要的是,这些结果强调了记忆如何与时间经验相互作用:令人难忘的开始可能使人们处于有效的编码状态,这可能反过来影响哪些时刻在时间上被扩展。关键词:时间感知、时间扩张、古怪效应、记忆性、场景感知披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。smg、JDKO和WAB设计了研究并撰写了手稿。MG和JDKO在WAB的输入下进行了实验和数据分析。开放实践所有数据将在本次提交的补充原始数据档案中提供,并通过OSF: https://osf.io/dkxez/?view_only=38c7d6db309d49219360b21c41b431d2.Additional informationFundingMG由芝加哥大学梅特卡夫神经科学研究实习资助。WAB由国家眼科研究所(R01-EY034432)支持。对于有用的评论,我们感谢脑桥实验室的成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Memorable beginnings, but forgettable endings: Intrinsic memorability alters our subjective experience of time
ABSTRACTTime is the fabric of experience – yet it is incredibly malleable in the mind of the observer: seeming to drag on, or fly right by at different moments. One of the most influential drivers of temporal distortions is attention, where heightened attention dilates subjective time. But an equally important feature of subjective experience involves not just the objects of attention, but also what information will naturally be remembered or forgotten, independent of attention (i.e., intrinsic image memorability). Here we test how memorability influences time perception. Observers viewed scenes in an oddball paradigm, where the last scene could be a forgettable “oddball” amidst memorable ones, or vice versa. Subjective time dilation occurred only for forgettable oddballs, but not memorable ones – demonstrating an oddball effect where the oddball did not differ in low-level visual features, image category, or even subjective memorability. But more importantly, these results emphasize how memory can interact with temporal experience: memorable beginnings may put people in an efficient encoding state, which may in turn influence which moments are dilated in time.KEYWORDS: Time perceptiontime dilationoddball effectmemorabilityscene perception Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Author contributionsMG, JDKO, and WAB designed the research and wrote the manuscript. MG and JDKO conducted the experiments and analyzed the data with input from WAB.Open practicesAll data will be available in the Supplementary Raw Data Archive included with this submission, and via OSF: https://osf.io/dkxez/?view_only=38c7d6db309d49219360b21c41b431d2.Additional informationFundingMG was funded by the University of Chicago Metcalf Research Internship in Neuroscience. WAB is supported by the National Eye Institute (R01-EY034432). For helpful comments, we thank the members of the Brain Bridge Lab.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VISUAL COGNITION
VISUAL COGNITION PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Visual Cognition publishes new empirical research that increases theoretical understanding of human visual cognition. Studies may be concerned with any aspect of visual cognition such as object, face, and scene recognition; visual attention and search; short-term and long-term visual memory; visual word recognition and reading; eye movement control and active vision; and visual imagery. The journal is devoted to research at the interface of visual perception and cognition and does not typically publish papers in areas of perception or psychophysics that are covered by the many publication outlets for those topics.
期刊最新文献
Auditory distractors are processed but do not interfere with visual search of any difficulty when sound is irrelevant Handling distractor interference in mixed and fixed search Distraction from long-term memory in visual search: Acquired procedural and template-based memory interfere with contextual cueing after target re-location Within-Subject manipulations of proactive control do not change negative templates benefits: Exploring the effect of reward on negative and positive cues No difference in prior representations of what to attend and what to ignore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1