衡量精英主义信念的多维方法:ISSP社会不平等调查的优势、局限性和替代方案

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIOLOGY International Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1080/00207659.2023.2274712
Juan Carlos Castillo, Julio Iturra, Luis Maldonado, Jorge Atria, Francisco Meneses
{"title":"衡量精英主义信念的多维方法:ISSP社会不平等调查的优势、局限性和替代方案","authors":"Juan Carlos Castillo, Julio Iturra, Luis Maldonado, Jorge Atria, Francisco Meneses","doi":"10.1080/00207659.2023.2274712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractA great part of the comparative international research that has attempted to measure meritocratic beliefs has used the social inequality module of the ISSP (International Social Survey Programme), which offers an unprecedented opportunity to compare meritocratic views in different societies. Based on a series of studies using ISSP data, the present paper proposes a multidimensional measurement framework for meritocratic beliefs. This framework distinguishes, on the one side, between perceptions and preferences and, on the other side, between meritocratic and not meritocratic aspects. In the first study, we test the multidimensional framework for meritocratic beliefs using the ISSP 2009 inequality module through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques. After identifying the advantages and some limitations of ISSP items for a multidimensional operationalization of meritocratic beliefs, in a second study, we suggest a modified set of items that better taps the different dimensions of meritocracy. We examined the measuring properties of this new instrument using a sample of Chilean adults (N = 2,141). Based on these results, we recommend improvements in measuring meritocratic beliefs in cross-national studies.Keywords: Meritocracysurvey methodologysocial inequalityconstruct measurement Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Despite the good fit indicators for the general model, attempts to fit a measurement invariant model run into convergence problems. Therefore, it is possible that the model present different fit indicators in different countries.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Chilean National Agency for Research and Development ANID, FONDECYT Grant 1210847, Millennium Nucleus on Digital Inequalities and Opportunities (NUDOS) Grant NCS2022_046, and FONDAP/COES Grant 15130009.","PeriodicalId":45362,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multidimensional Approach for Measuring Meritocratic Beliefs: Advantages, Limitations and Alternatives to the ISSP Social Inequality Survey\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Castillo, Julio Iturra, Luis Maldonado, Jorge Atria, Francisco Meneses\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207659.2023.2274712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractA great part of the comparative international research that has attempted to measure meritocratic beliefs has used the social inequality module of the ISSP (International Social Survey Programme), which offers an unprecedented opportunity to compare meritocratic views in different societies. Based on a series of studies using ISSP data, the present paper proposes a multidimensional measurement framework for meritocratic beliefs. This framework distinguishes, on the one side, between perceptions and preferences and, on the other side, between meritocratic and not meritocratic aspects. In the first study, we test the multidimensional framework for meritocratic beliefs using the ISSP 2009 inequality module through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques. After identifying the advantages and some limitations of ISSP items for a multidimensional operationalization of meritocratic beliefs, in a second study, we suggest a modified set of items that better taps the different dimensions of meritocracy. We examined the measuring properties of this new instrument using a sample of Chilean adults (N = 2,141). Based on these results, we recommend improvements in measuring meritocratic beliefs in cross-national studies.Keywords: Meritocracysurvey methodologysocial inequalityconstruct measurement Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Despite the good fit indicators for the general model, attempts to fit a measurement invariant model run into convergence problems. Therefore, it is possible that the model present different fit indicators in different countries.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Chilean National Agency for Research and Development ANID, FONDECYT Grant 1210847, Millennium Nucleus on Digital Inequalities and Opportunities (NUDOS) Grant NCS2022_046, and FONDAP/COES Grant 15130009.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2023.2274712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2023.2274712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大部分试图衡量精英主义信仰的比较国际研究都使用了ISSP(国际社会调查计划)的社会不平等模块,这为比较不同社会中的精英主义观点提供了前所未有的机会。基于一系列使用ISSP数据的研究,本文提出了一个精英信仰的多维测量框架。这个框架一方面区分了感知和偏好,另一方面区分了精英和非精英的方面。在第一项研究中,我们通过验证性因子分析(CFA)技术,使用ISSP 2009不平等模块对精英信仰的多维框架进行了测试。在确定了ISSP项目对精英主义信仰的多维操作化的优势和一些局限性之后,在第二项研究中,我们提出了一套修改后的项目,以更好地利用精英主义的不同维度。我们使用智利成年人样本(N = 2141)检查了这种新仪器的测量特性。基于这些结果,我们建议在跨国研究中改进衡量精英信仰的方法。关键词:任人唯贤;调查方法;社会不平等;注1尽管一般模型具有良好的拟合指标,但试图拟合测量不变模型会遇到收敛问题。因此,模型可能在不同的国家呈现不同的拟合指标。本研究得到了智利国家研究与发展机构ANID、FONDECYT基金1210847、千年数字不平等和机会核心基金NCS2022_046和FONDAP/COES基金15130009的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Multidimensional Approach for Measuring Meritocratic Beliefs: Advantages, Limitations and Alternatives to the ISSP Social Inequality Survey
AbstractA great part of the comparative international research that has attempted to measure meritocratic beliefs has used the social inequality module of the ISSP (International Social Survey Programme), which offers an unprecedented opportunity to compare meritocratic views in different societies. Based on a series of studies using ISSP data, the present paper proposes a multidimensional measurement framework for meritocratic beliefs. This framework distinguishes, on the one side, between perceptions and preferences and, on the other side, between meritocratic and not meritocratic aspects. In the first study, we test the multidimensional framework for meritocratic beliefs using the ISSP 2009 inequality module through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques. After identifying the advantages and some limitations of ISSP items for a multidimensional operationalization of meritocratic beliefs, in a second study, we suggest a modified set of items that better taps the different dimensions of meritocracy. We examined the measuring properties of this new instrument using a sample of Chilean adults (N = 2,141). Based on these results, we recommend improvements in measuring meritocratic beliefs in cross-national studies.Keywords: Meritocracysurvey methodologysocial inequalityconstruct measurement Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Despite the good fit indicators for the general model, attempts to fit a measurement invariant model run into convergence problems. Therefore, it is possible that the model present different fit indicators in different countries.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Chilean National Agency for Research and Development ANID, FONDECYT Grant 1210847, Millennium Nucleus on Digital Inequalities and Opportunities (NUDOS) Grant NCS2022_046, and FONDAP/COES Grant 15130009.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Including Marine-Related Items in the ISSP Environment Module is Important for a More Holistic Measure of Public Environmental Perceptions When do Women Take the Lead? Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective Automated Futures, Altered Priorities: The Impact of Technological Change on Environmental Attitudes and Policies Using the Campbell Paradigm to Understand the Role of Institutional Trust in Environmental Policy Support Do “environmental losers” pay the price? The role of individual and country vulnerabilities in the relationship between environmental concern and willingness to pay to protect the environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1