Irin A. Pimentel-Mannan, Joseph F. T. Nese, Alex Newson, Rhonda N. T. Nese, Jean Kjellstrand
{"title":"解决学科公平:包容性技能培养学习方法(ISLA)是排他性学科的替代方案","authors":"Irin A. Pimentel-Mannan, Joseph F. T. Nese, Alex Newson, Rhonda N. T. Nese, Jean Kjellstrand","doi":"10.1080/1045988x.2023.2252761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractExclusionary discipline practices are frequently utilized in schools despite decades of research indicating their ineffectiveness (American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force, Citation2008; Losen & Skiba, Citation2010; Muñiz, Citation2021). Research shows that removing students from the classroom does not change student behavior, is administered disproportionately to historically marginalized and minoritized groups, and is linked to the school-to-prison pipeline and lower academic achievement (Barnes & Motz, Citation2018; Losen & Martinez, Citation2020; Noltemeyer et al., Citation2015). This study explores the impact of the Inclusive Skill-Building Learning Approach (ISLA), an instructional and restorative alternative to exclusionary discipline practices, on discipline disproportionality. Pre-intervention, implementation, and post-intervention discipline data for 6th through 8th grade students were collected to understand the relation between ISLA and disproportional discipline data by race and gender. The findings suggest that ISLA is an effective tool for reducing overall in-school and out-of-school suspension rates as well as the risk indices for out-of-school suspensions for students of color, yet there is still a need for intervention adaptations to address specific disparities in exclusionary discipline practices. Research findings, study limitations, and implications and directions for future research and practice are further discussed.Keywords: Achievement gapdisproportionalitydiscipline equityexclusionary disciplineschool-based interventions Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 WOW is a three step research-informed strategy that can be used to create positive classroom environments: Welcome students, Own your classroom environment, and Wrap up class with the intention (Nese, Santiago-Rosario, et al., Citation2022).Additional informationFundingThe research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A180006 to the University of Oregon. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.Notes on contributorsIrin A. Pimentel-MannanIrin A. Pimentel-Mannan is a doctoral candidate at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are prevention of school-to-prison pipeline, exclusionary discipline, alternatives to exclusionary discipline practice, and parent-child relationships and child behavioral outcomes.Joseph F. T. NeseJoseph F. T. Nese is a research associate professor at the University of Oregon. His current research interests are computer science, behavioral outcomes, exclusionary discipline, and positive behavioral interventions & supports to advance the systems used by educators to support data-based decision making and improve student outcomes.Alex NewsonAlex Newson is a doctoral candidate at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are equitable neuro-inclusive research methodologies, collaborative neurodiversity affirming, trauma-informed educator training and education, and the promotion and empowerment of disabled and neurodivergent educator and student lived experiences and perspectives.Rhonda N. T. NeseRhonda N. T. Nese is an assistant professor at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are alternatives to exclusionary discipline, bullying and harassment prevention, addressing the impact of implicit biases on racial disproportionality in school discipline, implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices, and online professional development for improving school-wide support systems.Jean KjellstrandJean Kjellstrand is an assistant professor at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are impact of parental incarceration on children and the specific mechanisms through which risk is transmitted, and interventions to support incarcerated parents and their children both during the parents’ incarceration and reentry.","PeriodicalId":46774,"journal":{"name":"Preventing School Failure","volume":"127 21-22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing discipline equity: the Inclusive Skill-Building Learning Approach (ISLA) an alternative to exclusionary discipline\",\"authors\":\"Irin A. Pimentel-Mannan, Joseph F. T. Nese, Alex Newson, Rhonda N. T. Nese, Jean Kjellstrand\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1045988x.2023.2252761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractExclusionary discipline practices are frequently utilized in schools despite decades of research indicating their ineffectiveness (American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force, Citation2008; Losen & Skiba, Citation2010; Muñiz, Citation2021). Research shows that removing students from the classroom does not change student behavior, is administered disproportionately to historically marginalized and minoritized groups, and is linked to the school-to-prison pipeline and lower academic achievement (Barnes & Motz, Citation2018; Losen & Martinez, Citation2020; Noltemeyer et al., Citation2015). This study explores the impact of the Inclusive Skill-Building Learning Approach (ISLA), an instructional and restorative alternative to exclusionary discipline practices, on discipline disproportionality. Pre-intervention, implementation, and post-intervention discipline data for 6th through 8th grade students were collected to understand the relation between ISLA and disproportional discipline data by race and gender. The findings suggest that ISLA is an effective tool for reducing overall in-school and out-of-school suspension rates as well as the risk indices for out-of-school suspensions for students of color, yet there is still a need for intervention adaptations to address specific disparities in exclusionary discipline practices. Research findings, study limitations, and implications and directions for future research and practice are further discussed.Keywords: Achievement gapdisproportionalitydiscipline equityexclusionary disciplineschool-based interventions Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 WOW is a three step research-informed strategy that can be used to create positive classroom environments: Welcome students, Own your classroom environment, and Wrap up class with the intention (Nese, Santiago-Rosario, et al., Citation2022).Additional informationFundingThe research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A180006 to the University of Oregon. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.Notes on contributorsIrin A. Pimentel-MannanIrin A. Pimentel-Mannan is a doctoral candidate at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are prevention of school-to-prison pipeline, exclusionary discipline, alternatives to exclusionary discipline practice, and parent-child relationships and child behavioral outcomes.Joseph F. T. NeseJoseph F. T. Nese is a research associate professor at the University of Oregon. His current research interests are computer science, behavioral outcomes, exclusionary discipline, and positive behavioral interventions & supports to advance the systems used by educators to support data-based decision making and improve student outcomes.Alex NewsonAlex Newson is a doctoral candidate at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are equitable neuro-inclusive research methodologies, collaborative neurodiversity affirming, trauma-informed educator training and education, and the promotion and empowerment of disabled and neurodivergent educator and student lived experiences and perspectives.Rhonda N. T. NeseRhonda N. T. Nese is an assistant professor at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are alternatives to exclusionary discipline, bullying and harassment prevention, addressing the impact of implicit biases on racial disproportionality in school discipline, implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices, and online professional development for improving school-wide support systems.Jean KjellstrandJean Kjellstrand is an assistant professor at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are impact of parental incarceration on children and the specific mechanisms through which risk is transmitted, and interventions to support incarcerated parents and their children both during the parents’ incarceration and reentry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"volume\":\"127 21-22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2023.2252761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing School Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2023.2252761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:尽管数十年的研究表明其无效,但在学校中经常使用包容性纪律实践(美国心理协会零容忍工作组,Citation2008;Losen & Skiba, Citation2010;穆尼斯,Citation2021)。研究表明,将学生从课堂上带走并不能改变学生的行为,而且对历史上被边缘化和少数群体的管理不成比例,并且与从学校到监狱的管道和较低的学习成绩有关(Barnes & Motz, Citation2018;Losen & Martinez, Citation2020;Noltemeyer等人,Citation2015)。本研究探讨了包容性技能建设学习方法(ISLA)对学科不均衡的影响,这是一种排他性学科实践的指导性和恢复性替代方法。本研究收集了六至八年级学生干预前、干预实施和干预后的纪律数据,以了解ISLA与种族和性别失衡纪律数据之间的关系。研究结果表明,ISLA是一种有效的工具,可以降低有色人种学生的在校和校外停学率以及校外停学的风险指数,但仍需要干预适应,以解决排他性纪律实践中的具体差异。进一步讨论了研究结果、研究的局限性以及对未来研究和实践的启示和方向。关键词:成绩差距不平衡学科公平排他性学科校本干预披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1 WOW是一个基于研究的三步策略,可用于创造积极的课堂环境:欢迎学生,拥有你的课堂环境,并以意图结束课堂(Nese, Santiago-Rosario等人,Citation2022)。本研究报告由美国教育部教育科学研究所通过拨款R305A180006资助俄勒冈大学。所表达的观点是作者的观点,不代表研究所或美国教育部的观点。作者简介:sirin a . pimentel - mannanin a . pimentel - mannanin是俄勒冈大学的博士生。她目前的研究兴趣是预防从学校到监狱的管道,排他性纪律,排他性纪律实践的替代方案,以及亲子关系和儿童行为结果。Joseph F. T. Nese是俄勒冈大学的研究副教授。他目前的研究兴趣是计算机科学,行为结果,排他性学科,积极的行为干预和支持,以推进教育工作者使用的系统,以支持基于数据的决策和提高学生的成绩。Alex Newson是俄勒冈大学的博士候选人。她目前的研究兴趣是公平的神经包容性研究方法,协作神经多样性确认,创伤知情教育者培训和教育,以及促进和授权残疾人和神经分化教育者和学生的生活经验和观点。Rhonda N. T. Nese是俄勒冈大学的助理教授。她目前的研究兴趣是排他性纪律的替代方案,欺凌和骚扰预防,解决学校纪律中种族不成比例的隐性偏见的影响,循证实践的实施和可持续性,以及改善全校支持系统的在线专业发展。Jean Kjellstrand是俄勒冈大学的助理教授。她目前的研究兴趣是父母监禁对儿童的影响以及风险传播的具体机制,以及在父母监禁和重返社会期间支持被监禁父母及其子女的干预措施。
Addressing discipline equity: the Inclusive Skill-Building Learning Approach (ISLA) an alternative to exclusionary discipline
AbstractExclusionary discipline practices are frequently utilized in schools despite decades of research indicating their ineffectiveness (American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force, Citation2008; Losen & Skiba, Citation2010; Muñiz, Citation2021). Research shows that removing students from the classroom does not change student behavior, is administered disproportionately to historically marginalized and minoritized groups, and is linked to the school-to-prison pipeline and lower academic achievement (Barnes & Motz, Citation2018; Losen & Martinez, Citation2020; Noltemeyer et al., Citation2015). This study explores the impact of the Inclusive Skill-Building Learning Approach (ISLA), an instructional and restorative alternative to exclusionary discipline practices, on discipline disproportionality. Pre-intervention, implementation, and post-intervention discipline data for 6th through 8th grade students were collected to understand the relation between ISLA and disproportional discipline data by race and gender. The findings suggest that ISLA is an effective tool for reducing overall in-school and out-of-school suspension rates as well as the risk indices for out-of-school suspensions for students of color, yet there is still a need for intervention adaptations to address specific disparities in exclusionary discipline practices. Research findings, study limitations, and implications and directions for future research and practice are further discussed.Keywords: Achievement gapdisproportionalitydiscipline equityexclusionary disciplineschool-based interventions Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 WOW is a three step research-informed strategy that can be used to create positive classroom environments: Welcome students, Own your classroom environment, and Wrap up class with the intention (Nese, Santiago-Rosario, et al., Citation2022).Additional informationFundingThe research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A180006 to the University of Oregon. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.Notes on contributorsIrin A. Pimentel-MannanIrin A. Pimentel-Mannan is a doctoral candidate at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are prevention of school-to-prison pipeline, exclusionary discipline, alternatives to exclusionary discipline practice, and parent-child relationships and child behavioral outcomes.Joseph F. T. NeseJoseph F. T. Nese is a research associate professor at the University of Oregon. His current research interests are computer science, behavioral outcomes, exclusionary discipline, and positive behavioral interventions & supports to advance the systems used by educators to support data-based decision making and improve student outcomes.Alex NewsonAlex Newson is a doctoral candidate at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are equitable neuro-inclusive research methodologies, collaborative neurodiversity affirming, trauma-informed educator training and education, and the promotion and empowerment of disabled and neurodivergent educator and student lived experiences and perspectives.Rhonda N. T. NeseRhonda N. T. Nese is an assistant professor at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are alternatives to exclusionary discipline, bullying and harassment prevention, addressing the impact of implicit biases on racial disproportionality in school discipline, implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices, and online professional development for improving school-wide support systems.Jean KjellstrandJean Kjellstrand is an assistant professor at the University of Oregon. Her current research interests are impact of parental incarceration on children and the specific mechanisms through which risk is transmitted, and interventions to support incarcerated parents and their children both during the parents’ incarceration and reentry.
期刊介绍:
Preventing School Failure provides a forum in which to examine critically emerging and evidence-based practices that are both data driven and practical for children and youth in general and alternative education systems. Authors are afforded the opportunity to discuss and debate critical and sometimes controversial issues that affect the education of children and adolescents in various settings. Preventing School Failure is a peer-reviewed academic journal for administrators, educators, mental health workers, juvenile justice and corrections personnel, day and residential treatment personnel, staff-development specialists, teacher educators, and others. Our goal is to share authoritative and timely information with a wide-ranging audience dedicated to serving children and adolescents in general education, special education, and alternative education programs. We accept for review manuscripts that contain critical and integrated literature reviews, objective program evaluations, evidence-based strategies and procedures, program descriptions, and policy-related content. As appropriate, manuscripts should contain enough detail that readers are able to put useful or innovative strategies or procedures into practice.