波能沟通与社会对立

Maria C. Uyarra, Iratxe Menchaca, Sarai Pouso, Laura Zubiate, Dorleta Marina, Enored Le Bourhis, Thomas Soulard, Sandrine Jamet, Niall Dunphy, Janete Gonçalves, Erica Cruz, Juan Bald
{"title":"波能沟通与社会对立","authors":"Maria C. Uyarra, Iratxe Menchaca, Sarai Pouso, Laura Zubiate, Dorleta Marina, Enored Le Bourhis, Thomas Soulard, Sandrine Jamet, Niall Dunphy, Janete Gonçalves, Erica Cruz, Juan Bald","doi":"10.36688/ewtec-2023-436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the benefits of marine renewable energies (MRE) to the decarbonisation, public opposition has often been posed to MRE projects. This opposition is one of the reasons slowing down Europe´s energy transition towards clean energies. Aside from one wave energy production farm operating in Europe, other developments are still at pilot or prototype phases. In the context of European SAFEWAVE project (https://www.safewave-project.eu/), we aim to understand the causes that trigger opposition to wave energy projects and identify how communication could improve the perception and attitudes towards MRE projects. To achieve this aim, a systematic analysis of ongoing wave energy projects, scientific bibliography and social media has been carried out. Outputs of this research indicate that opposition to wave energy is rather limited and primarily posed by national and local communities, as well as NGOs. Opposition emerges after envisaging negative affection on i) economy (e.g., conflict with existing uses), ii) social aspects (e.g., local communities for which the benefits are unclear), and iii) the environment (e.g., uncertainty on environmental impacts). Despite much of the wave energy information available on the media is produced and communicated by scientists and engineers (which should be considered a reliable sources of information), most of the communicated content focus on the drivers, the technological developments and benefits. Limited information on potential impacts of wave energy projects is shared. The target audiences vary between channels; YouTube, Facebook and Google have a wider audience than Twitter, which seeks a more professional audience. A holistic communication approach, in which both expected benefits and impacts are communicated may reduce opposition and help society to become more marine energy-literate, allowing for informed decisions and responsible behaviours/attitudes. Availability of official documents, participatory approaches, and transparency are crucial for improving the perception of future wave energy projects.","PeriodicalId":201789,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wave energy communication and social opposition\",\"authors\":\"Maria C. Uyarra, Iratxe Menchaca, Sarai Pouso, Laura Zubiate, Dorleta Marina, Enored Le Bourhis, Thomas Soulard, Sandrine Jamet, Niall Dunphy, Janete Gonçalves, Erica Cruz, Juan Bald\",\"doi\":\"10.36688/ewtec-2023-436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the benefits of marine renewable energies (MRE) to the decarbonisation, public opposition has often been posed to MRE projects. This opposition is one of the reasons slowing down Europe´s energy transition towards clean energies. Aside from one wave energy production farm operating in Europe, other developments are still at pilot or prototype phases. In the context of European SAFEWAVE project (https://www.safewave-project.eu/), we aim to understand the causes that trigger opposition to wave energy projects and identify how communication could improve the perception and attitudes towards MRE projects. To achieve this aim, a systematic analysis of ongoing wave energy projects, scientific bibliography and social media has been carried out. Outputs of this research indicate that opposition to wave energy is rather limited and primarily posed by national and local communities, as well as NGOs. Opposition emerges after envisaging negative affection on i) economy (e.g., conflict with existing uses), ii) social aspects (e.g., local communities for which the benefits are unclear), and iii) the environment (e.g., uncertainty on environmental impacts). Despite much of the wave energy information available on the media is produced and communicated by scientists and engineers (which should be considered a reliable sources of information), most of the communicated content focus on the drivers, the technological developments and benefits. Limited information on potential impacts of wave energy projects is shared. The target audiences vary between channels; YouTube, Facebook and Google have a wider audience than Twitter, which seeks a more professional audience. A holistic communication approach, in which both expected benefits and impacts are communicated may reduce opposition and help society to become more marine energy-literate, allowing for informed decisions and responsible behaviours/attitudes. Availability of official documents, participatory approaches, and transparency are crucial for improving the perception of future wave energy projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36688/ewtec-2023-436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36688/ewtec-2023-436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管海洋可再生能源(MRE)对脱碳有好处,但公众经常反对MRE项目。这种反对是欧洲能源向清洁能源转型放缓的原因之一。除了在欧洲运营的一个波浪能生产农场外,其他开发项目仍处于试点或原型阶段。在欧洲SAFEWAVE项目(https://www.safewave-project.eu/)的背景下,我们的目标是了解引发反对波浪能项目的原因,并确定如何沟通可以改善对MRE项目的看法和态度。为了实现这一目标,对正在进行的波浪能项目、科学书目和社交媒体进行了系统分析。研究结果表明,对波浪能的反对相当有限,主要来自国家和地方社区,以及非政府组织。在设想对1)经济(例如,与现有用途的冲突),2)社会方面(例如,利益不明确的当地社区)和3)环境(例如,环境影响的不确定性)的负面影响之后,出现了反对意见。尽管媒体上提供的许多波浪能信息是由科学家和工程师制作和传播的(这应该被认为是可靠的信息来源),但大多数传播的内容都集中在驱动因素、技术发展和利益上。关于波浪能项目潜在影响的有限信息被共享。不同频道的目标受众不同;YouTube、Facebook和谷歌比Twitter拥有更广泛的受众,而Twitter寻求的是更专业的受众。一种全面的沟通方法,既能传达预期的利益,也能传达预期的影响,这可能会减少反对意见,并帮助社会更加了解海洋能源,从而做出明智的决定和负责任的行为/态度。官方文件的可用性、参与性方法和透明度对于提高对未来波浪能项目的认识至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wave energy communication and social opposition
Despite the benefits of marine renewable energies (MRE) to the decarbonisation, public opposition has often been posed to MRE projects. This opposition is one of the reasons slowing down Europe´s energy transition towards clean energies. Aside from one wave energy production farm operating in Europe, other developments are still at pilot or prototype phases. In the context of European SAFEWAVE project (https://www.safewave-project.eu/), we aim to understand the causes that trigger opposition to wave energy projects and identify how communication could improve the perception and attitudes towards MRE projects. To achieve this aim, a systematic analysis of ongoing wave energy projects, scientific bibliography and social media has been carried out. Outputs of this research indicate that opposition to wave energy is rather limited and primarily posed by national and local communities, as well as NGOs. Opposition emerges after envisaging negative affection on i) economy (e.g., conflict with existing uses), ii) social aspects (e.g., local communities for which the benefits are unclear), and iii) the environment (e.g., uncertainty on environmental impacts). Despite much of the wave energy information available on the media is produced and communicated by scientists and engineers (which should be considered a reliable sources of information), most of the communicated content focus on the drivers, the technological developments and benefits. Limited information on potential impacts of wave energy projects is shared. The target audiences vary between channels; YouTube, Facebook and Google have a wider audience than Twitter, which seeks a more professional audience. A holistic communication approach, in which both expected benefits and impacts are communicated may reduce opposition and help society to become more marine energy-literate, allowing for informed decisions and responsible behaviours/attitudes. Availability of official documents, participatory approaches, and transparency are crucial for improving the perception of future wave energy projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Sea Trial of a Wave-Energy Converter at Tuticorin Port – Challenges comprehensive assessment tool for low-TRL current energy converters Wave energy communication and social opposition Choosing wave energy devices for community-led marine energy development Tidal turbulence in medium depth water, primarily a model study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1