Luana de Lima Lopes, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da Cunha, Quintiliano Siqueira Schroden Nomelini
{"title":"无人机在大豆作物农药施用中的应用","authors":"Luana de Lima Lopes, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da Cunha, Quintiliano Siqueira Schroden Nomelini","doi":"10.3390/agriengineering5040126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for pesticide application has increased substantially. However, there is a lack of technical information regarding the optimal operational parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of pesticide application on a soybean crop using a UAV employing different spray nozzles. The experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design with four treatments and eight repetitions. The trial was conducted in a soybean growing area during the soybean reproductive stage (1.1 m tall). The treatments included aerial application (rate: 10 L hm−2) using an Agras MG1-P UAV with XR 11001 (flat fan), AirMix 11001 (air-induction flat fan), and COAP 9001 (hollow cone spray) nozzles; for comparison, ground application (rate of 100 L hm−2) using a constant pressure knapsack sprayer with an XR 110015 (flat fan) nozzle was performed. The deposition was evaluated by quantifying a tracer (brilliant blue) using spectrophotometry and analyzing the droplet spectrum using water-sensitive paper. Furthermore, the application quality was investigated using statistical process control methodology. The best deposition performance was exhibited by the application via UAV using the COAP 9001 and AirMix 11001 nozzles. For all the treatments, the process remained under statistical control, indicating commendable adherence to quality standards. The aerial application provided greater penetration of the spray into the crop canopy. With the use of the UAV, the coverage on the water-sensitive paper was <1%; moreover, the AirMix 11001 and XR 110015 nozzles had the lowest drift potential.","PeriodicalId":7846,"journal":{"name":"AgriEngineering","volume":"6 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Pesticide Application in Soybean Crop\",\"authors\":\"Luana de Lima Lopes, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da Cunha, Quintiliano Siqueira Schroden Nomelini\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/agriengineering5040126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for pesticide application has increased substantially. However, there is a lack of technical information regarding the optimal operational parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of pesticide application on a soybean crop using a UAV employing different spray nozzles. The experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design with four treatments and eight repetitions. The trial was conducted in a soybean growing area during the soybean reproductive stage (1.1 m tall). The treatments included aerial application (rate: 10 L hm−2) using an Agras MG1-P UAV with XR 11001 (flat fan), AirMix 11001 (air-induction flat fan), and COAP 9001 (hollow cone spray) nozzles; for comparison, ground application (rate of 100 L hm−2) using a constant pressure knapsack sprayer with an XR 110015 (flat fan) nozzle was performed. The deposition was evaluated by quantifying a tracer (brilliant blue) using spectrophotometry and analyzing the droplet spectrum using water-sensitive paper. Furthermore, the application quality was investigated using statistical process control methodology. The best deposition performance was exhibited by the application via UAV using the COAP 9001 and AirMix 11001 nozzles. For all the treatments, the process remained under statistical control, indicating commendable adherence to quality standards. The aerial application provided greater penetration of the spray into the crop canopy. With the use of the UAV, the coverage on the water-sensitive paper was <1%; moreover, the AirMix 11001 and XR 110015 nozzles had the lowest drift potential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AgriEngineering\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AgriEngineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5040126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriEngineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5040126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
使用无人驾驶飞行器(uav)进行农药施用已大幅增加。然而,缺乏关于最佳操作参数的技术信息。本研究的目的是利用不同喷嘴的无人机对大豆作物施用农药的质量进行评价。试验采用完全随机设计,4个处理,8个重复。试验在大豆育成期(高1.1 m)大豆种植区进行。处理包括空中应用(速率:10 L hm - 2)使用一架Agras MG1-P无人机,带有XR 11001(扁平风扇)、AirMix 11001(空气感应扁平风扇)和COAP 9001(空心锥形喷雾)喷嘴;为了进行比较,使用带有XR 110015(扁平风扇)喷嘴的恒压背负式喷雾器进行地面应用(速率为100 L hm−2)。通过分光光度法定量示踪剂(亮蓝)和水敏纸分析液滴光谱来评估沉积。此外,应用统计过程控制方法对应用质量进行了调查。使用COAP 9001和AirMix 11001喷嘴的无人机应用显示出最佳的沉积性能。所有的治疗过程都在统计控制之下,这表明对质量标准的坚持是值得赞扬的。空中施用提供了更大的渗透到作物冠层的喷雾。在无人机的使用下,水敏纸上的覆盖率为1%;此外,AirMix 11001和XR 110015喷嘴的漂移势最低。
Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Pesticide Application in Soybean Crop
The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for pesticide application has increased substantially. However, there is a lack of technical information regarding the optimal operational parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of pesticide application on a soybean crop using a UAV employing different spray nozzles. The experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design with four treatments and eight repetitions. The trial was conducted in a soybean growing area during the soybean reproductive stage (1.1 m tall). The treatments included aerial application (rate: 10 L hm−2) using an Agras MG1-P UAV with XR 11001 (flat fan), AirMix 11001 (air-induction flat fan), and COAP 9001 (hollow cone spray) nozzles; for comparison, ground application (rate of 100 L hm−2) using a constant pressure knapsack sprayer with an XR 110015 (flat fan) nozzle was performed. The deposition was evaluated by quantifying a tracer (brilliant blue) using spectrophotometry and analyzing the droplet spectrum using water-sensitive paper. Furthermore, the application quality was investigated using statistical process control methodology. The best deposition performance was exhibited by the application via UAV using the COAP 9001 and AirMix 11001 nozzles. For all the treatments, the process remained under statistical control, indicating commendable adherence to quality standards. The aerial application provided greater penetration of the spray into the crop canopy. With the use of the UAV, the coverage on the water-sensitive paper was <1%; moreover, the AirMix 11001 and XR 110015 nozzles had the lowest drift potential.