chatgpt和谷歌的比较在金融市场上很有用

Samet GÜRSOY, Ethem KILIÇ
{"title":"chatgpt和谷歌的比较在金融市场上很有用","authors":"Samet GÜRSOY, Ethem KILIÇ","doi":"10.38004/sobad.1343515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of using ChatGPT and Google Bard in finance. As a method, academic studies and researches done so far were examined. In this direction, the advantages and disadvantages of both methods were tried to be presented in tables. As a result of the study, it was observed that special abilities can be attributed to both artificial intelligence systems, and when compared, it was found that the net advantage would be better understood over time. Because artificial intelligence systems are fed by the feedback of users. However, it has been observed that while ChatGPT works effectively in data analysis and rapid decision making, it may have limitations when it comes to freedom from emotion and bias. Google Bard, on the other hand, has been stated to be effective in risk management and portfolio optimization with its advanced forecasting and analysis capabilities. However, it is common opinion that the use of up-to-date and accurate data is important in both systems and that the factors will affect the performance of the methods.","PeriodicalId":32495,"journal":{"name":"Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"99 S101","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE COMPARISON OF CHATGPT AND GOOGLE BARD USE IN FINANCIAL MARKETS\",\"authors\":\"Samet GÜRSOY, Ethem KILIÇ\",\"doi\":\"10.38004/sobad.1343515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main purpose of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of using ChatGPT and Google Bard in finance. As a method, academic studies and researches done so far were examined. In this direction, the advantages and disadvantages of both methods were tried to be presented in tables. As a result of the study, it was observed that special abilities can be attributed to both artificial intelligence systems, and when compared, it was found that the net advantage would be better understood over time. Because artificial intelligence systems are fed by the feedback of users. However, it has been observed that while ChatGPT works effectively in data analysis and rapid decision making, it may have limitations when it comes to freedom from emotion and bias. Google Bard, on the other hand, has been stated to be effective in risk management and portfolio optimization with its advanced forecasting and analysis capabilities. However, it is common opinion that the use of up-to-date and accurate data is important in both systems and that the factors will affect the performance of the methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"99 S101\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38004/sobad.1343515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38004/sobad.1343515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是调查在金融中使用ChatGPT和Google Bard的优点和缺点。作为一种方法,对迄今为止所做的学术研究和研究进行了审查。在这个方向上,两种方法的优点和缺点都试图在表格中呈现。研究结果表明,两种人工智能系统都可以产生特殊能力,经过比较,发现随着时间的推移,人们会更好地理解净优势。因为人工智能系统是由用户的反馈提供的。然而,据观察,虽然ChatGPT在数据分析和快速决策方面有效,但在不受情绪和偏见影响方面可能存在局限性。另一方面,Google Bard凭借其先进的预测和分析能力,在风险管理和投资组合优化方面表现出色。然而,人们普遍认为,在这两个系统中使用最新和准确的数据是很重要的,而且这些因素将影响方法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE COMPARISON OF CHATGPT AND GOOGLE BARD USE IN FINANCIAL MARKETS
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of using ChatGPT and Google Bard in finance. As a method, academic studies and researches done so far were examined. In this direction, the advantages and disadvantages of both methods were tried to be presented in tables. As a result of the study, it was observed that special abilities can be attributed to both artificial intelligence systems, and when compared, it was found that the net advantage would be better understood over time. Because artificial intelligence systems are fed by the feedback of users. However, it has been observed that while ChatGPT works effectively in data analysis and rapid decision making, it may have limitations when it comes to freedom from emotion and bias. Google Bard, on the other hand, has been stated to be effective in risk management and portfolio optimization with its advanced forecasting and analysis capabilities. However, it is common opinion that the use of up-to-date and accurate data is important in both systems and that the factors will affect the performance of the methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dış Politika Kültürünün Karar Alma Sürecine Etkisi: ABD’nin Irak İşgali THE COMPARISON OF CHATGPT AND GOOGLE BARD USE IN FINANCIAL MARKETS The Impact of Sectoral Foreign Trade on Inflation in Türkiye: ARDL Approach Social Media Real and False Self Will to Power (RFSWP) Defense Mechanisms and Research Results “The Unknown God: Agnostic Essays” Adlı Esere “Mantıku’t-Tayr: Kuş Dili” Müvacehesinden Bir Bakış
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1