语言学习者和非语言学习者的自我概念和自我设想及其对学习动机的影响

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1111/ijal.12518
Lyndsay R. Buckingham, Janina Iwaniec
{"title":"语言学习者和非语言学习者的自我概念和自我设想及其对学习动机的影响","authors":"Lyndsay R. Buckingham,&nbsp;Janina Iwaniec","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To date, most studies that explore the differences in motivation between content and language-integrated learning (CLIL) and non-CLIL learners have been mainly quantitative or have not controlled for differences in socio-economic status (SES). While many researchers agree that CLIL learners tend to have greater motivation than non-CLIL learners, there has been little explanation of the reasons behind this difference, perhaps partly because the field lacks studies from the perspective of CLIL students themselves. Based on the L2 motivational self-system and the construct of self-concept, this study employed a mixed-methods approach to explore CLIL and non-CLIL learners’ current and future self-visions. Fifteen-year-old learners in the Madrid region (<i>n</i> = 348) completed a questionnaire that considered their SES levels as well as experiences related to the scales of English self-concept, academic self-concept, and teacher expectations. The same learners were then invited to take part in focus groups in which researchers delved into the reasoning behind their motivation. Despite no significant difference in SES levels between CLIL and non-CLIL learner groups, CLIL participants are found to display a slightly more positive self-concept and more robust ideal L2 self-visions, which may explain the perceived greater motivation among CLIL learners to study (in) English. Furthermore, the L2 ought-to self is found to be a secondary, yet potentially positive force toward higher motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-concept and self-visions in CLIL and non-CLIL learners and their effect on motivation\",\"authors\":\"Lyndsay R. Buckingham,&nbsp;Janina Iwaniec\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijal.12518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To date, most studies that explore the differences in motivation between content and language-integrated learning (CLIL) and non-CLIL learners have been mainly quantitative or have not controlled for differences in socio-economic status (SES). While many researchers agree that CLIL learners tend to have greater motivation than non-CLIL learners, there has been little explanation of the reasons behind this difference, perhaps partly because the field lacks studies from the perspective of CLIL students themselves. Based on the L2 motivational self-system and the construct of self-concept, this study employed a mixed-methods approach to explore CLIL and non-CLIL learners’ current and future self-visions. Fifteen-year-old learners in the Madrid region (<i>n</i> = 348) completed a questionnaire that considered their SES levels as well as experiences related to the scales of English self-concept, academic self-concept, and teacher expectations. The same learners were then invited to take part in focus groups in which researchers delved into the reasoning behind their motivation. Despite no significant difference in SES levels between CLIL and non-CLIL learner groups, CLIL participants are found to display a slightly more positive self-concept and more robust ideal L2 self-visions, which may explain the perceived greater motivation among CLIL learners to study (in) English. Furthermore, the L2 ought-to self is found to be a secondary, yet potentially positive force toward higher motivation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迄今为止,大多数探讨内容与语言整合学习(CLIL)和非 CLIL 学习者之间学习动机差异的研究主要是定量研究,或者没有控制社会经济地位(SES)的差异。虽然许多研究者都认为,CLIL 学习者的学习动机往往比非 CLIL 学习者的学习动机更强,但对这种差异背后的原因却鲜有解释,部分原因可能是该领域缺乏从 CLIL 学生自身角度进行的研究。本研究以 L2 动机自我系统和自我概念为基础,采用混合方法探讨 CLIL 和非 CLIL 学习者当前和未来的自我憧憬。马德里地区 15 岁的学习者(n = 348)填写了一份调查问卷,其中考虑了他们的社会经济地位水平以及与英语自我概念、学术自我概念和教师期望量表相关的经历。随后,研究人员邀请这些学生参加焦点小组,深入探讨他们学习动机背后的原因。尽管 CLIL 学习者群体与非 CLIL 学习者群体在 SES 水平上没有明显差异,但 CLIL 学习者表现出的自我概念略微积极一些,理想的 L2 自我愿景也更强烈一些,这或许可以解释为什么 CLIL 学习者认为学习(英语)的动力更大。此外,我们还发现,语言学习者的 "应然自我"(ought-to-self)是提高学习动机的一个次要但潜在的积极因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-concept and self-visions in CLIL and non-CLIL learners and their effect on motivation

To date, most studies that explore the differences in motivation between content and language-integrated learning (CLIL) and non-CLIL learners have been mainly quantitative or have not controlled for differences in socio-economic status (SES). While many researchers agree that CLIL learners tend to have greater motivation than non-CLIL learners, there has been little explanation of the reasons behind this difference, perhaps partly because the field lacks studies from the perspective of CLIL students themselves. Based on the L2 motivational self-system and the construct of self-concept, this study employed a mixed-methods approach to explore CLIL and non-CLIL learners’ current and future self-visions. Fifteen-year-old learners in the Madrid region (n = 348) completed a questionnaire that considered their SES levels as well as experiences related to the scales of English self-concept, academic self-concept, and teacher expectations. The same learners were then invited to take part in focus groups in which researchers delved into the reasoning behind their motivation. Despite no significant difference in SES levels between CLIL and non-CLIL learner groups, CLIL participants are found to display a slightly more positive self-concept and more robust ideal L2 self-visions, which may explain the perceived greater motivation among CLIL learners to study (in) English. Furthermore, the L2 ought-to self is found to be a secondary, yet potentially positive force toward higher motivation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The big global issues: Applied linguists and transdisciplinarity beyond SLA Influential sociocultural factors on teacher agency in times of educational change: Reflection from a Southeast Asian context Social presence and other individual differences in asynchronous English communication Unveiling the complexity of L2 learners’ emotions and emotion regulation: A retrodictive qualitative modeling study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1