初任小学教师的课程制定经验:知识主导型课程制定的推动因素与制约因素

Phillip Poulton, Nicole Mockler
{"title":"初任小学教师的课程制定经验:知识主导型课程制定的推动因素与制约因素","authors":"Phillip Poulton, Nicole Mockler","doi":"10.1002/curj.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With global trends focussed on standardisation of curriculum and increased teacher accountability, it has become commonplace for curriculum to be viewed simplistically as a product. While all teachers engage in forms of classroom curriculum‐making, questions remain as to what this looks like within an educational landscape that continues to portray teaching as a purely technical activity. This paper explores two Australian early career primary teachers' experiences of curriculum‐making, drawing attention to the enabling and constraining conditions which shape such experiences. We consider the impact of these enabled and constrained experiences on early career teachers' aspirations and ongoing development as knowledge‐led curriculum‐makers. We contend that such constrained experiences limit opportunities for early career teachers to develop professional identities as knowledge‐led curriculum‐makers and continue to reinforce unhelpful representations of teachers as ‘technicians’.","PeriodicalId":93147,"journal":{"name":"The curriculum journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early career primary teachers' curriculum‐making experiences: Enablers and constraints to knowledge‐led forms of curriculum‐making\",\"authors\":\"Phillip Poulton, Nicole Mockler\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/curj.225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract With global trends focussed on standardisation of curriculum and increased teacher accountability, it has become commonplace for curriculum to be viewed simplistically as a product. While all teachers engage in forms of classroom curriculum‐making, questions remain as to what this looks like within an educational landscape that continues to portray teaching as a purely technical activity. This paper explores two Australian early career primary teachers' experiences of curriculum‐making, drawing attention to the enabling and constraining conditions which shape such experiences. We consider the impact of these enabled and constrained experiences on early career teachers' aspirations and ongoing development as knowledge‐led curriculum‐makers. We contend that such constrained experiences limit opportunities for early career teachers to develop professional identities as knowledge‐led curriculum‐makers and continue to reinforce unhelpful representations of teachers as ‘technicians’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The curriculum journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The curriculum journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The curriculum journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球趋势集中在课程标准化和教师问责制的增加,课程被简单地视为一种产品已经变得司空见惯。虽然所有的教师都参与了课堂课程的制定,但在教育领域,教学仍然是一种纯粹的技术活动,这是什么样子的问题仍然存在。本文探讨了两位澳大利亚早期职业小学教师的课程制定经验,提请注意形成这些经验的有利条件和制约条件。我们考虑了这些有利的和受限的经验对早期职业教师的愿望和作为知识导向课程制定者的持续发展的影响。我们认为,这种受约束的经历限制了早期职业教师发展作为知识主导的课程制定者的专业身份的机会,并继续强化教师作为“技术人员”的无益表象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early career primary teachers' curriculum‐making experiences: Enablers and constraints to knowledge‐led forms of curriculum‐making
Abstract With global trends focussed on standardisation of curriculum and increased teacher accountability, it has become commonplace for curriculum to be viewed simplistically as a product. While all teachers engage in forms of classroom curriculum‐making, questions remain as to what this looks like within an educational landscape that continues to portray teaching as a purely technical activity. This paper explores two Australian early career primary teachers' experiences of curriculum‐making, drawing attention to the enabling and constraining conditions which shape such experiences. We consider the impact of these enabled and constrained experiences on early career teachers' aspirations and ongoing development as knowledge‐led curriculum‐makers. We contend that such constrained experiences limit opportunities for early career teachers to develop professional identities as knowledge‐led curriculum‐makers and continue to reinforce unhelpful representations of teachers as ‘technicians’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward a grammar of curriculum practice: Embracing new conceptions of curriculum and curriculum planning By Edmund C.Short, State University of New York Press. 2023. 160 pp. $33.95 (paperback). ISBN: 9781438493473 Rethinking student teachers' professional learning in Wales: Promoting reflection‐in‐action Development and evaluation of neuroscience lesson content to improve Key Stage 3 (11–14 year old) students' understanding of the early years in England Reclaiming accountability through collaborative curriculum enquiry: New directions in teacher evaluation Barriers to curriculum accessibility for students with visual impairment in general education setting: The experience of lower secondary school students in Senegal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1