拆解混杂:开发和首次验证的多维工具,以分析混合专业人士

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Public Administration Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1111/padm.12938
Amelia Compagni, Paola Roberta Boscolo, Giorgio Giacomelli, Marco Sartirana
{"title":"拆解混杂:开发和首次验证的多维工具,以分析混合专业人士","authors":"Amelia Compagni, Paola Roberta Boscolo, Giorgio Giacomelli, Marco Sartirana","doi":"10.1111/padm.12938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hybrid professionals, that is, professionals who have transitioned to managerial roles, have emerged in numerous public settings. Through in‐depth qualitative methodologies, the literature has shown a good degree of heterogeneity in the way hybrid professionals perceive and manage their hybridity. In this study, we aim to develop a theory‐based, multidimensional instrument able to capture such heterogeneity in a lean but sensitive way. In this instrument, we combine consolidated scales of identity centrality and integration and vignettes, on the one hand, to measure the perception of hybrid professionals of the relationship between their professional and managerial identities and, on the other hand, to elicit the practices they use to deal with the demands of the professional and managerial logics. We first validate the instrument on a sample of school principals in the Italian context and then describe the six profiles of hybrid professionals derived from the analysis. We suggest three avenues for applying such an instrument.","PeriodicalId":48284,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration","volume":"222 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking hybridity: Development and first validation of a multidimensional instrument to profile hybrid professionals\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Compagni, Paola Roberta Boscolo, Giorgio Giacomelli, Marco Sartirana\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/padm.12938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Hybrid professionals, that is, professionals who have transitioned to managerial roles, have emerged in numerous public settings. Through in‐depth qualitative methodologies, the literature has shown a good degree of heterogeneity in the way hybrid professionals perceive and manage their hybridity. In this study, we aim to develop a theory‐based, multidimensional instrument able to capture such heterogeneity in a lean but sensitive way. In this instrument, we combine consolidated scales of identity centrality and integration and vignettes, on the one hand, to measure the perception of hybrid professionals of the relationship between their professional and managerial identities and, on the other hand, to elicit the practices they use to deal with the demands of the professional and managerial logics. We first validate the instrument on a sample of school principals in the Italian context and then describe the six profiles of hybrid professionals derived from the analysis. We suggest three avenues for applying such an instrument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"222 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12938\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要混合专业人士,即过渡到管理角色的专业人士,已经出现在许多公共环境中。通过深入的定性方法,文献显示了混合专业人员感知和管理其混合性的方式的良好程度的异质性。在这项研究中,我们的目标是开发一种基于理论的多维工具,能够以精益但敏感的方式捕捉这种异质性。在这个工具中,我们结合了身份中心性、整合和小情节的综合量表,一方面衡量混合专业人士对其专业和管理身份之间关系的感知,另一方面,引出他们用来处理专业和管理逻辑需求的实践。我们首先在意大利的学校校长样本上验证了该工具,然后描述了从分析中得出的混合专业人士的六种概况。我们建议应用这种工具的三个途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unpacking hybridity: Development and first validation of a multidimensional instrument to profile hybrid professionals
Abstract Hybrid professionals, that is, professionals who have transitioned to managerial roles, have emerged in numerous public settings. Through in‐depth qualitative methodologies, the literature has shown a good degree of heterogeneity in the way hybrid professionals perceive and manage their hybridity. In this study, we aim to develop a theory‐based, multidimensional instrument able to capture such heterogeneity in a lean but sensitive way. In this instrument, we combine consolidated scales of identity centrality and integration and vignettes, on the one hand, to measure the perception of hybrid professionals of the relationship between their professional and managerial identities and, on the other hand, to elicit the practices they use to deal with the demands of the professional and managerial logics. We first validate the instrument on a sample of school principals in the Italian context and then describe the six profiles of hybrid professionals derived from the analysis. We suggest three avenues for applying such an instrument.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Public Administration is a major refereed journal with global circulation and global coverage. The journal publishes articles on public administration, public policy and public management. The journal"s reach is both inclusive and international and much of the work published is comparative in nature. A high percentage of articles are sourced from the enlarging Europe and cover all aspects of West and East European public administration.
期刊最新文献
Algorithmic formalization: Impacts on administrative processes Making nonpunitive accountability matter: Exploring behavioral effects of nonpunitive accountability in a conjoint experiment Why do politicians perceive the same financial conditions differently? How to extend pilot innovation in public services: A case of children's social care innovation Street‐level bureaucrats' perceptions of “the job”: Deviation from professional particularities and micro creation of public value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1