小檗碱改善豚鼠变应性气道炎症的组织病理学改变

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 TROPICAL MEDICINE Biomedica Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI:10.24911/biomedica/5-886
Syeda Tahira Zaidi, Mahwash Malik, Javeria Sarfraz, Sadia Chiragh
{"title":"小檗碱改善豚鼠变应性气道炎症的组织病理学改变","authors":"Syeda Tahira Zaidi, Mahwash Malik, Javeria Sarfraz, Sadia Chiragh","doi":"10.24911/biomedica/5-886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and Objective:</strong> Berberine has anti-inflammatory properties through pathways that are also involved in asthma. Therefore, it is postulated that it will be effective in reducing airway inflammation in the allergic asthmatic model. The objective of the current study was to observe the effects of berberine on the histopathology of lungs in sensitized Guinea pigs and compare the changes with that of the standard drug, dexamethasone.</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Methods:</strong> This experimental study was conducted at the Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore, Pakistan, from February 2016 to April 2016. Twenty-four healthy Guinea pigs were divided randomly into four groups: normal control, Ovalbumin (OVA ) group, OVA + berberine group, and OVA + dexa group. The last three groups were sensitized on days 0 and 14 and challenged on days 25, 26, and 27 with OVA. Berberine and dexamethasone were administered intraperitoneally to the respective groups before each challenge. The animals were then sacrificed on day 28 under anesthesia, lungs were dissected, and tissue samples were assessed microscopically for morphology and status of inflammation in each group. Data were analyzed by applying the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test followed by the Mann Whitney U test using SPSS 20.</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Results:</strong> The comparison of histopathological changes revealed that the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lung airways was significantly higher (p-value &amp;le;0.01) in the OVA group as compared to the normal control group. Both OVA + berberine and OVA + dexa groups showed a reduction in total lung inflammation (p-value &amp;le;0.01 vs. OVA group) equally. The effect of berberine on epithelial changes was nonsignificant (p-value 0.206 vs. OVA group), while dexamethasone showed significant improvement as compared to the OVA group (p-value 0.007). However, the difference between berberine and dexamethasone treatment was nonsignificant (p-value &amp;le;0.05).</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was concluded that berberine improved the histopathological score of lung inflammation in sensitized Guinea pigs, equivalent to that of dexamethasone, with lesser effects on epithelial changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9186,"journal":{"name":"Biomedica","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Berberine Improves Histopathological Changes of Allergic Airway Inflammation in Guinea Pigs\",\"authors\":\"Syeda Tahira Zaidi, Mahwash Malik, Javeria Sarfraz, Sadia Chiragh\",\"doi\":\"10.24911/biomedica/5-886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and Objective:</strong> Berberine has anti-inflammatory properties through pathways that are also involved in asthma. Therefore, it is postulated that it will be effective in reducing airway inflammation in the allergic asthmatic model. The objective of the current study was to observe the effects of berberine on the histopathology of lungs in sensitized Guinea pigs and compare the changes with that of the standard drug, dexamethasone.</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Methods:</strong> This experimental study was conducted at the Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore, Pakistan, from February 2016 to April 2016. Twenty-four healthy Guinea pigs were divided randomly into four groups: normal control, Ovalbumin (OVA ) group, OVA + berberine group, and OVA + dexa group. The last three groups were sensitized on days 0 and 14 and challenged on days 25, 26, and 27 with OVA. Berberine and dexamethasone were administered intraperitoneally to the respective groups before each challenge. The animals were then sacrificed on day 28 under anesthesia, lungs were dissected, and tissue samples were assessed microscopically for morphology and status of inflammation in each group. Data were analyzed by applying the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test followed by the Mann Whitney U test using SPSS 20.</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Results:</strong> The comparison of histopathological changes revealed that the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lung airways was significantly higher (p-value &amp;le;0.01) in the OVA group as compared to the normal control group. Both OVA + berberine and OVA + dexa groups showed a reduction in total lung inflammation (p-value &amp;le;0.01 vs. OVA group) equally. The effect of berberine on epithelial changes was nonsignificant (p-value 0.206 vs. OVA group), while dexamethasone showed significant improvement as compared to the OVA group (p-value 0.007). However, the difference between berberine and dexamethasone treatment was nonsignificant (p-value &amp;le;0.05).</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was concluded that berberine improved the histopathological score of lung inflammation in sensitized Guinea pigs, equivalent to that of dexamethasone, with lesser effects on epithelial changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedica\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24911/biomedica/5-886\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TROPICAL MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24911/biomedica/5-886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

< <strong>背景和目标:</strong>小檗碱通过与哮喘有关的途径具有抗炎特性。因此,推测其对变应性哮喘模型的气道炎症有一定的减轻作用。本研究的目的是观察小檗碱对致敏豚鼠肺组织病理学的影响,并与标准药物地塞米松的变化进行比较。</p> & lt; p> & lt; strong>方法:& lt; / strong>本实验研究于2016年2月至2016年4月在巴基斯坦拉合尔研究生医学研究所进行。24只健康豚鼠随机分为4组:正常对照组、卵白蛋白组、卵白蛋白+小檗碱组、卵白蛋白+ dexa组。后3组分别于第0、14天致敏,第25、26、27天攻毒。每次攻毒前分别腹腔注射小檗碱和地塞米松。第28天麻醉处死动物,解剖肺,显微镜下观察各组组织的形态和炎症状态。数据分析采用Kruskal-Wallis方差检验分析和Mann Whitney U检验,使用SPSS 20.</p> & lt; p> & lt; strong>结果:& lt; / strong>组织病理学变化的比较显示,OVA组肺气道炎症细胞浸润明显高于正常对照组(p值≤0.01)。OVA +小檗碱组和OVA + dexa组均显示肺总炎症减少(p值≤0.01)。小檗碱对上皮变化的影响不显著(与OVA组相比p值为0.206),而地塞米松与OVA组相比有显著改善(p值为0.007)。然而,小檗碱与地塞米松治疗的差异不显著(p值≤0.05)。</p> < <strong>结论:</strong>结论:小檗碱改善致敏豚鼠肺部炎症组织病理学评分,与地塞米松相当,但对上皮变化的影响较小。</p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Berberine Improves Histopathological Changes of Allergic Airway Inflammation in Guinea Pigs

Background and Objective: Berberine has anti-inflammatory properties through pathways that are also involved in asthma. Therefore, it is postulated that it will be effective in reducing airway inflammation in the allergic asthmatic model. The objective of the current study was to observe the effects of berberine on the histopathology of lungs in sensitized Guinea pigs and compare the changes with that of the standard drug, dexamethasone.

Methods: This experimental study was conducted at the Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore, Pakistan, from February 2016 to April 2016. Twenty-four healthy Guinea pigs were divided randomly into four groups: normal control, Ovalbumin (OVA ) group, OVA + berberine group, and OVA + dexa group. The last three groups were sensitized on days 0 and 14 and challenged on days 25, 26, and 27 with OVA. Berberine and dexamethasone were administered intraperitoneally to the respective groups before each challenge. The animals were then sacrificed on day 28 under anesthesia, lungs were dissected, and tissue samples were assessed microscopically for morphology and status of inflammation in each group. Data were analyzed by applying the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test followed by the Mann Whitney U test using SPSS 20.

Results: The comparison of histopathological changes revealed that the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lung airways was significantly higher (p-value &le;0.01) in the OVA group as compared to the normal control group. Both OVA + berberine and OVA + dexa groups showed a reduction in total lung inflammation (p-value &le;0.01 vs. OVA group) equally. The effect of berberine on epithelial changes was nonsignificant (p-value 0.206 vs. OVA group), while dexamethasone showed significant improvement as compared to the OVA group (p-value 0.007). However, the difference between berberine and dexamethasone treatment was nonsignificant (p-value &le;0.05).

Conclusion: It was concluded that berberine improved the histopathological score of lung inflammation in sensitized Guinea pigs, equivalent to that of dexamethasone, with lesser effects on epithelial changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedica
Biomedica 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomédica is the quarterly journal of the Instituto Nacional de Salud of Colombia [Colombia’s National Health Institute]. Its purpose is to publish the results of original research that contributes meaningfully to knowledge in health and biomedical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Fusariosis in cancer patients: 13 case series report and literature review Tinea capitis outbreak and other superficial mycosis in an urban community of Medellín Make the diagnosis - Second part Make the diagnosis - First part Fast and cost-effective protocol to produce Paracoccidioides spp. antigens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1