配对联想刺激与短潜伏期传入抑制对运动可塑性的影响

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/nsn.nsn_23_23
H. Evren Boran, Bülent Cengiz
{"title":"配对联想刺激与短潜伏期传入抑制对运动可塑性的影响","authors":"H. Evren Boran, Bülent Cengiz","doi":"10.4103/nsn.nsn_23_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A BSTRACT Background: Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) is a method used to assess sensorimotor integration. Inhibition typically occurs at an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 20–22 ms or N20 + 2 ms. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) applied at certain ISIs consecutively can induce changes in corticospinal excitability. Usually, ISIs of 10 and 25 ms are applied in PAS. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between ISIs of SAI and PAS, a neuromodulation paradigm. To achieve this, we first identified the optimal ISIs that produced maximum inhibition and facilitation during SAI by evaluating multiple ISIs. Subsequently, we applied the PAS paradigm with these ISIs. Materials and Methods: Twelve healthy participants were recruited for the study conducted over three sessions. During the first session, we examined the ISI of maximum inhibitory and ISI of facilitatory or minimum inhibitory (if facilitation was absent) in each participant at multiple ISIs. In the other two sessions, we applied PAS at the ISI of maximum inhibitory and the ISI of facilitatory or minimum inhibitory. We compared the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes before PAS, immediately after PAS, and 30 min after PAS. Results: The highest inhibition in SAI was observed at an ISI of 22 ms. In 60% of the participants, inhibition was most prominent at this ISI. Facilitation was not observed in 50% of the participants. During the PAS paradigm, which used the ISI of maximum inhibitory, significant facilitation was observed 30 min after the procedure compared with baseline ( P = 0.011) and immediately post-PAS ( P = 0.026). The mean MEP amplitude decreased significantly 30 min after the procedure compared with the baseline in ISI of only detected facilitation ( P = 0.041). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the ISI of maximum inhibition can vary among individuals, and that facilitation may not be observed in everyone within the ISI range of 22 ms to 40 ms. The results indicate that paired stimuli at ISI of maximum inhibitory in SAI increase corticospinal excitability. In addition, PAS at ISI of only facilitation decreases excitability. These changes in excitability may be explained by spike-timing-dependent plasticity.","PeriodicalId":48555,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paired Associative Stimulation with Interstimulus Intervals of Short-latency Afferent Inhibition on Motor Plasticity\",\"authors\":\"H. Evren Boran, Bülent Cengiz\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/nsn.nsn_23_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A BSTRACT Background: Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) is a method used to assess sensorimotor integration. Inhibition typically occurs at an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 20–22 ms or N20 + 2 ms. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) applied at certain ISIs consecutively can induce changes in corticospinal excitability. Usually, ISIs of 10 and 25 ms are applied in PAS. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between ISIs of SAI and PAS, a neuromodulation paradigm. To achieve this, we first identified the optimal ISIs that produced maximum inhibition and facilitation during SAI by evaluating multiple ISIs. Subsequently, we applied the PAS paradigm with these ISIs. Materials and Methods: Twelve healthy participants were recruited for the study conducted over three sessions. During the first session, we examined the ISI of maximum inhibitory and ISI of facilitatory or minimum inhibitory (if facilitation was absent) in each participant at multiple ISIs. In the other two sessions, we applied PAS at the ISI of maximum inhibitory and the ISI of facilitatory or minimum inhibitory. We compared the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes before PAS, immediately after PAS, and 30 min after PAS. Results: The highest inhibition in SAI was observed at an ISI of 22 ms. In 60% of the participants, inhibition was most prominent at this ISI. Facilitation was not observed in 50% of the participants. During the PAS paradigm, which used the ISI of maximum inhibitory, significant facilitation was observed 30 min after the procedure compared with baseline ( P = 0.011) and immediately post-PAS ( P = 0.026). The mean MEP amplitude decreased significantly 30 min after the procedure compared with the baseline in ISI of only detected facilitation ( P = 0.041). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the ISI of maximum inhibition can vary among individuals, and that facilitation may not be observed in everyone within the ISI range of 22 ms to 40 ms. The results indicate that paired stimuli at ISI of maximum inhibitory in SAI increase corticospinal excitability. In addition, PAS at ISI of only facilitation decreases excitability. These changes in excitability may be explained by spike-timing-dependent plasticity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_23_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_23_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:短潜伏期传入抑制(SAI)是一种用于评估感觉运动整合的方法。抑制通常发生在刺激间隔(ISI) 20-22 ms或N20 + 2 ms。在一定的ISIs连续应用配对联想刺激(PAS)可诱导皮质脊髓兴奋性的变化。通常,在PAS中应用10和25 ms的ISIs。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨SAI的ISIs与PAS(一种神经调节范式)之间的关系。为了实现这一目标,我们首先通过评估多个ISIs确定了在SAI过程中产生最大抑制和促进作用的最佳ISIs。随后,我们将PAS范式应用于这些ISIs。材料和方法:招募了12名健康参与者,进行了三个阶段的研究。在第一次会议中,我们在多个ISIs中检查了每个参与者的最大抑制性ISI和促进性或最小抑制性ISI(如果没有促进性)。在另外两组中,我们分别在最大抑制性ISI和促进性或最小抑制性ISI上应用PAS。我们比较了运动诱发电位(MEP)在PAS前、PAS后立即和PAS后30分钟的振幅。结果:ISI为22 ms时,对SAI的抑制作用最大。在60%的参与者中,抑制在此ISI最为突出。50%的参与者没有观察到促进作用。在使用最大抑制ISI的PAS范式中,与基线(P = 0.011)和PAS后立即(P = 0.026)相比,在手术后30分钟观察到显著的促进(P = 0.011)。与仅检测到促进作用的ISI的基线相比,手术后30分钟平均MEP振幅显著下降(P = 0.041)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,最大抑制的ISI在个体之间是不同的,并且在22 ms至40 ms的ISI范围内可能不是每个人都观察到促进。结果表明,在SAI抑制最大的ISI处成对刺激可增加皮质脊髓兴奋性。此外,仅易化ISI处的PAS降低了兴奋性。这些兴奋性的变化可以用峰值时间相关的可塑性来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paired Associative Stimulation with Interstimulus Intervals of Short-latency Afferent Inhibition on Motor Plasticity
A BSTRACT Background: Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) is a method used to assess sensorimotor integration. Inhibition typically occurs at an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 20–22 ms or N20 + 2 ms. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) applied at certain ISIs consecutively can induce changes in corticospinal excitability. Usually, ISIs of 10 and 25 ms are applied in PAS. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between ISIs of SAI and PAS, a neuromodulation paradigm. To achieve this, we first identified the optimal ISIs that produced maximum inhibition and facilitation during SAI by evaluating multiple ISIs. Subsequently, we applied the PAS paradigm with these ISIs. Materials and Methods: Twelve healthy participants were recruited for the study conducted over three sessions. During the first session, we examined the ISI of maximum inhibitory and ISI of facilitatory or minimum inhibitory (if facilitation was absent) in each participant at multiple ISIs. In the other two sessions, we applied PAS at the ISI of maximum inhibitory and the ISI of facilitatory or minimum inhibitory. We compared the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes before PAS, immediately after PAS, and 30 min after PAS. Results: The highest inhibition in SAI was observed at an ISI of 22 ms. In 60% of the participants, inhibition was most prominent at this ISI. Facilitation was not observed in 50% of the participants. During the PAS paradigm, which used the ISI of maximum inhibitory, significant facilitation was observed 30 min after the procedure compared with baseline ( P = 0.011) and immediately post-PAS ( P = 0.026). The mean MEP amplitude decreased significantly 30 min after the procedure compared with the baseline in ISI of only detected facilitation ( P = 0.041). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the ISI of maximum inhibition can vary among individuals, and that facilitation may not be observed in everyone within the ISI range of 22 ms to 40 ms. The results indicate that paired stimuli at ISI of maximum inhibitory in SAI increase corticospinal excitability. In addition, PAS at ISI of only facilitation decreases excitability. These changes in excitability may be explained by spike-timing-dependent plasticity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology is the double blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology EEG-EMG. The journal is a quarterly publication, published in March, June, September and December and the publication language of the journal is English.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Sonography in Parkinson’s Disease and Parkinsonism The liverpool adverse drug events profile (LAEP): Validity and reliability of Turkish version (LAEP-TR) Congenital myasthenic syndrome with a rare mutation diagnosed at adult age Comparison of surgery and local steroid injections for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial High-dose steroids versus standard treatment for myasthenic crisis: A single-center, longitudinal, 12-year retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1