护理干预对预防社区和医疗机构中老年人跌倒的有效性:对研究性临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Enfermeria Clinica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfcli.2023.08.002
María Isabel Orts-Cortés , María José Cabañero-Martínez , Cristóbal Meseguer-Liza , Claudia P. Arredondo-González , Carmen de la Cuesta-Benjumea , Eva Abad-Corpa
{"title":"护理干预对预防社区和医疗机构中老年人跌倒的有效性:对研究性临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"María Isabel Orts-Cortés ,&nbsp;María José Cabañero-Martínez ,&nbsp;Cristóbal Meseguer-Liza ,&nbsp;Claudia P. Arredondo-González ,&nbsp;Carmen de la Cuesta-Benjumea ,&nbsp;Eva Abad-Corpa","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2023.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To estimate the effectiveness of fall prevention programs in people aged 65 years and older involving nursing professionals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included available full-text randomized clinical trials on nurse-led prevention of falls in the community in people over 65 years of age and reporting the incidence of such falls. An extensive search was performed in 14 databases covering the period 2016 to 2018 for publications in English, French, Portuguese and Spanish.</p><p>The quality of the papers was assessed independently and blindly by reviewers working in pairs using the risk of bias dominios of the Cochrane Collaboration.</p><p>The hazard ratio was used as a measure of the effect size of the incidence of falls. A random-effects model was assumed for statistical analyses. The influence of moderator variables of the studies on the effect sizes was performed using ANOVAs and its 95% <span>C</span>I for each moderator category.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 31 randomized clinical trials were selected with 25,551 participants. The most frequent type of intervention was education (57.1%), followed by multifactorial models (37.1%). The probability of falling was significantly reduced by 13% in the intervention groups compared to the control groups (<em>RR</em> +<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.87). Multifactorial (<em>RR</em> +<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.89) and education-based (<em>RR</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->+0.84) interventions significantly reduced the probability of falls by 11% and 16%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Discarding publication bias prevention programs carried out by nurses produce a significant 10% reduction in falls. Education-based and multifactorial interventions are the most effective when conducted by nurses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efectividad de las intervenciones enfermeras en la prevención de caídas en adultos mayores en la comunidad y en entornos sanitarios: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de ECA\",\"authors\":\"María Isabel Orts-Cortés ,&nbsp;María José Cabañero-Martínez ,&nbsp;Cristóbal Meseguer-Liza ,&nbsp;Claudia P. Arredondo-González ,&nbsp;Carmen de la Cuesta-Benjumea ,&nbsp;Eva Abad-Corpa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfcli.2023.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To estimate the effectiveness of fall prevention programs in people aged 65 years and older involving nursing professionals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included available full-text randomized clinical trials on nurse-led prevention of falls in the community in people over 65 years of age and reporting the incidence of such falls. An extensive search was performed in 14 databases covering the period 2016 to 2018 for publications in English, French, Portuguese and Spanish.</p><p>The quality of the papers was assessed independently and blindly by reviewers working in pairs using the risk of bias dominios of the Cochrane Collaboration.</p><p>The hazard ratio was used as a measure of the effect size of the incidence of falls. A random-effects model was assumed for statistical analyses. The influence of moderator variables of the studies on the effect sizes was performed using ANOVAs and its 95% <span>C</span>I for each moderator category.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 31 randomized clinical trials were selected with 25,551 participants. The most frequent type of intervention was education (57.1%), followed by multifactorial models (37.1%). The probability of falling was significantly reduced by 13% in the intervention groups compared to the control groups (<em>RR</em> +<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.87). Multifactorial (<em>RR</em> +<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.89) and education-based (<em>RR</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->+0.84) interventions significantly reduced the probability of falls by 11% and 16%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Discarding publication bias prevention programs carried out by nurses produce a significant 10% reduction in falls. Education-based and multifactorial interventions are the most effective when conducted by nurses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Clinica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862123001031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862123001031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法我们纳入了现有的全文随机临床试验,这些试验是关于在护士指导下预防 65 岁以上老年人在社区跌倒,并报告了此类跌倒的发生率。我们在 14 个数据库中对 2016 年至 2018 年期间的英文、法文、葡萄牙文和西班牙文出版物进行了广泛检索。论文质量由两人一组的审稿人使用 Cochrane 协作组织的偏倚风险 dominios 进行独立、盲审评估。统计分析采用随机效应模型。使用方差分析和每类调节变量的 95% CI 来分析研究中的调节变量对效应大小的影响。结果共筛选出 31 项随机临床试验,参与人数达 25551 人。最常见的干预类型是教育(57.1%),其次是多因素模型(37.1%)。与对照组相比,干预组的跌倒概率明显降低了13%(RR + = 0.87)。多因素干预(RR + = 0.89)和基于教育的干预(RR = +0.84)分别显著降低了 11% 和 16% 的跌倒概率。由护士实施以教育为基础的多因素干预最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efectividad de las intervenciones enfermeras en la prevención de caídas en adultos mayores en la comunidad y en entornos sanitarios: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de ECA

Objective

To estimate the effectiveness of fall prevention programs in people aged 65 years and older involving nursing professionals.

Methods

We included available full-text randomized clinical trials on nurse-led prevention of falls in the community in people over 65 years of age and reporting the incidence of such falls. An extensive search was performed in 14 databases covering the period 2016 to 2018 for publications in English, French, Portuguese and Spanish.

The quality of the papers was assessed independently and blindly by reviewers working in pairs using the risk of bias dominios of the Cochrane Collaboration.

The hazard ratio was used as a measure of the effect size of the incidence of falls. A random-effects model was assumed for statistical analyses. The influence of moderator variables of the studies on the effect sizes was performed using ANOVAs and its 95% CI for each moderator category.

Results

A total of 31 randomized clinical trials were selected with 25,551 participants. The most frequent type of intervention was education (57.1%), followed by multifactorial models (37.1%). The probability of falling was significantly reduced by 13% in the intervention groups compared to the control groups (RR + = 0.87). Multifactorial (RR + = 0.89) and education-based (RR = +0.84) interventions significantly reduced the probability of falls by 11% and 16%, respectively.

Conclusions

Discarding publication bias prevention programs carried out by nurses produce a significant 10% reduction in falls. Education-based and multifactorial interventions are the most effective when conducted by nurses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
期刊最新文献
Uso de la medicina complementaria y alternativa y enfoques para hacer frente al estrés en las mujeres con cáncer de mama: un estudio transversal El papel moderador de la experiencia laboral en el efecto de la cultura ética en la denuncia de irregularidades en los profesionales de la salud y el efecto de la confianza organizacional en la denuncia de irregularidades Impacto de los niveles de interacción enfermera-paciente en la práctica humanística de enfermería: estudio transversal, descriptivo y correlacional Satisfacción de los pacientes sobre la atención recibida por la enfermera en el triaje de los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios: revisión de alcance Transferencia de resultados en la práctica clínica y participación ciudadana en la investigación en cuidados: una integración necesaria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1