{"title":"经济思想史上的战争:欧洲历史上的片段","authors":"Emma Rothschild","doi":"10.1080/09672567.2023.2265518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe paper is concerned with war in the history of economic thought. It looks at disputes about abstraction versus historicism over the long 19th century, in relation to war and the state. It then looks at the historical setting in which Léon Walras and others developed their ideas of political economy. It concludes with reflections on the presence or absence of the state in modern economic history.Keywords: WarEuropeabstractionWalrasstateJEL CODES: B10B30N00 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 \"UN climate report: It’s ‘now or never’ to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees,\" 4 April 2022, https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/04/1115452.2 “On the Invisible Trail of Binary Black Holes,” Science News, 100, 26 (25 December 1971), 419-420, 419.3 I am grateful to participants in the Leverhulme/Thyssen programme on the Rise and Fall of Historical Political Economy at the Centre for History and Economics, University of Cambridge, for conversations about the institutional decline of historical economics. On the scale of post-1919 needs for welfare in Austria, see Hsia (Citation2022).4 On Perlmutter, see Dadej and Leszczawski-Schwerk, “Together and Apart,\" 39; Stauter-Halsted, The Devil's Chain, 75-76. On Grünfeld, see Grünfeld (Citation1932, Citation1942a, Citation1942b), and \"Oral history interview with Judith Grunfel,\" United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Accession Number: 1999.A.0122.1675, https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn874845 Alberto Alesina seminar on political economy at Harvard University, https://www.iq.harvard.edu/program-political-economy, accessed on 23 October 2022.6 See Chen and Yang (Citation2019) and Beraja, Yang and Yuchtman (Citation2022).","PeriodicalId":51791,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wartime in the history of economic thought: episodes in European history\",\"authors\":\"Emma Rothschild\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09672567.2023.2265518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe paper is concerned with war in the history of economic thought. It looks at disputes about abstraction versus historicism over the long 19th century, in relation to war and the state. It then looks at the historical setting in which Léon Walras and others developed their ideas of political economy. It concludes with reflections on the presence or absence of the state in modern economic history.Keywords: WarEuropeabstractionWalrasstateJEL CODES: B10B30N00 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 \\\"UN climate report: It’s ‘now or never’ to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees,\\\" 4 April 2022, https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/04/1115452.2 “On the Invisible Trail of Binary Black Holes,” Science News, 100, 26 (25 December 1971), 419-420, 419.3 I am grateful to participants in the Leverhulme/Thyssen programme on the Rise and Fall of Historical Political Economy at the Centre for History and Economics, University of Cambridge, for conversations about the institutional decline of historical economics. On the scale of post-1919 needs for welfare in Austria, see Hsia (Citation2022).4 On Perlmutter, see Dadej and Leszczawski-Schwerk, “Together and Apart,\\\" 39; Stauter-Halsted, The Devil's Chain, 75-76. On Grünfeld, see Grünfeld (Citation1932, Citation1942a, Citation1942b), and \\\"Oral history interview with Judith Grunfel,\\\" United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Accession Number: 1999.A.0122.1675, https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn874845 Alberto Alesina seminar on political economy at Harvard University, https://www.iq.harvard.edu/program-political-economy, accessed on 23 October 2022.6 See Chen and Yang (Citation2019) and Beraja, Yang and Yuchtman (Citation2022).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2023.2265518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2023.2265518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文从经济思想史的角度探讨战争问题。它着眼于19世纪关于战争和国家的抽象主义与历史主义的争论。然后考察了瓦尔拉斯和其他人发展政治经济学思想的历史背景。最后对现代经济史上国家的存在与否进行了反思。关键词:wareeurope abstract walrasstatejel代码:B10B30N00披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1“联合国气候报告:2022年4月4日,https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/04/1115452.2“在双黑洞的无形轨迹上”,科学新闻,100,26(1971年12月25日),419-420,419.3我感谢剑桥大学历史与经济中心Leverhulme/Thyssen历史政治经济学兴衰项目的参与者,他们讨论了历史经济学的制度衰落。关于1919年后奥地利福利需求的规模,见Hsia (Citation2022)关于Perlmutter,见Dadej and Leszczawski-Schwerk,“Together and Apart”,39;Stauter-Halsted,《魔鬼的锁链》,75-76页。关于gr nfeld,见gr nfeld (Citation1932, Citation1942a, Citation1942b),以及“对Judith Grunfel的口述历史采访”,美国大屠杀纪念博物馆,登记号:1999.A.0122.1675, https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn874845哈佛大学Alberto Alesina政治经济学研讨会,https://www.iq.harvard.edu/program-political-economy, 2022.6见Chen and Yang (Citation2019)和Beraja, Yang和Yuchtman (Citation2022)。
Wartime in the history of economic thought: episodes in European history
AbstractThe paper is concerned with war in the history of economic thought. It looks at disputes about abstraction versus historicism over the long 19th century, in relation to war and the state. It then looks at the historical setting in which Léon Walras and others developed their ideas of political economy. It concludes with reflections on the presence or absence of the state in modern economic history.Keywords: WarEuropeabstractionWalrasstateJEL CODES: B10B30N00 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 "UN climate report: It’s ‘now or never’ to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees," 4 April 2022, https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/04/1115452.2 “On the Invisible Trail of Binary Black Holes,” Science News, 100, 26 (25 December 1971), 419-420, 419.3 I am grateful to participants in the Leverhulme/Thyssen programme on the Rise and Fall of Historical Political Economy at the Centre for History and Economics, University of Cambridge, for conversations about the institutional decline of historical economics. On the scale of post-1919 needs for welfare in Austria, see Hsia (Citation2022).4 On Perlmutter, see Dadej and Leszczawski-Schwerk, “Together and Apart," 39; Stauter-Halsted, The Devil's Chain, 75-76. On Grünfeld, see Grünfeld (Citation1932, Citation1942a, Citation1942b), and "Oral history interview with Judith Grunfel," United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Accession Number: 1999.A.0122.1675, https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn874845 Alberto Alesina seminar on political economy at Harvard University, https://www.iq.harvard.edu/program-political-economy, accessed on 23 October 2022.6 See Chen and Yang (Citation2019) and Beraja, Yang and Yuchtman (Citation2022).
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.