欧洲作物多样化实践:经济跨案例研究比较

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainability Science Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1007/s11625-023-01413-1
J. A. Zabala, V. Martínez-García, J. M. Martínez-Paz, E. I. López-Becerra, M. Nasso, E. Díaz-Pereira, V. Sánchez-Navarro, J. Álvaro-Fuentes, M. González-Rosado, R. Farina, C. Di Bene, E. Huerta, A. Jurrius, K. Frey-Treseler, D. Lóczy, L. Fosci, E. Blasi, H. Lehtonen, F. Alcon
{"title":"欧洲作物多样化实践:经济跨案例研究比较","authors":"J. A. Zabala, V. Martínez-García, J. M. Martínez-Paz, E. I. López-Becerra, M. Nasso, E. Díaz-Pereira, V. Sánchez-Navarro, J. Álvaro-Fuentes, M. González-Rosado, R. Farina, C. Di Bene, E. Huerta, A. Jurrius, K. Frey-Treseler, D. Lóczy, L. Fosci, E. Blasi, H. Lehtonen, F. Alcon","doi":"10.1007/s11625-023-01413-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Crop diversification practices (CDPs) are alternative strategies aimed to achieve sustainable cropping systems and food production overcoming the agro-environmental impacts of conventional cropping systems such as monoculture. Thus, this paper aims to improve the knowledge of implementing CDPs in different European pedoclimatic regions by assessing the economic performance at the farm level. CDPs are compared with conventional cropping systems and clustered in terms of their gross margin (GM) results and variations. Farm-level assessment shows that CDPs provide positive economic results, representing an adaptive management strategy for ecological transition, without compromising economic sustainability. Particularly, the main findings show that (1) the impact of diversification depends more on crop type than on the selected CDPs, (2) most farms exhibited a low GM with low economic impact, and (3) there is a great likelihood that the CDPs facilitate the buildup of more resilient farming systems.","PeriodicalId":49457,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Science","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crop diversification practices in Europe: an economic cross-case study comparison\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Zabala, V. Martínez-García, J. M. Martínez-Paz, E. I. López-Becerra, M. Nasso, E. Díaz-Pereira, V. Sánchez-Navarro, J. Álvaro-Fuentes, M. González-Rosado, R. Farina, C. Di Bene, E. Huerta, A. Jurrius, K. Frey-Treseler, D. Lóczy, L. Fosci, E. Blasi, H. Lehtonen, F. Alcon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11625-023-01413-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Crop diversification practices (CDPs) are alternative strategies aimed to achieve sustainable cropping systems and food production overcoming the agro-environmental impacts of conventional cropping systems such as monoculture. Thus, this paper aims to improve the knowledge of implementing CDPs in different European pedoclimatic regions by assessing the economic performance at the farm level. CDPs are compared with conventional cropping systems and clustered in terms of their gross margin (GM) results and variations. Farm-level assessment shows that CDPs provide positive economic results, representing an adaptive management strategy for ecological transition, without compromising economic sustainability. Particularly, the main findings show that (1) the impact of diversification depends more on crop type than on the selected CDPs, (2) most farms exhibited a low GM with low economic impact, and (3) there is a great likelihood that the CDPs facilitate the buildup of more resilient farming systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainability Science\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainability Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01413-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01413-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作物多样化实践(CDPs)是旨在实现可持续种植系统和粮食生产的替代战略,克服传统种植系统(如单一栽培)对农业环境的影响。因此,本文旨在通过评估农场层面的经济表现,提高对在欧洲不同气候地区实施CDPs的认识。将CDPs与传统种植系统进行比较,并根据其毛利率(GM)结果和变化进行分组。农场层面的评估表明,cdp提供了积极的经济效益,代表了生态转型的适应性管理策略,而不损害经济可持续性。特别是,主要发现表明:(1)多样化的影响更多地取决于作物类型而不是选择的CDPs;(2)大多数农场表现出低转基因和低经济影响;(3)CDPs很有可能促进更具弹性的农业系统的建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crop diversification practices in Europe: an economic cross-case study comparison
Abstract Crop diversification practices (CDPs) are alternative strategies aimed to achieve sustainable cropping systems and food production overcoming the agro-environmental impacts of conventional cropping systems such as monoculture. Thus, this paper aims to improve the knowledge of implementing CDPs in different European pedoclimatic regions by assessing the economic performance at the farm level. CDPs are compared with conventional cropping systems and clustered in terms of their gross margin (GM) results and variations. Farm-level assessment shows that CDPs provide positive economic results, representing an adaptive management strategy for ecological transition, without compromising economic sustainability. Particularly, the main findings show that (1) the impact of diversification depends more on crop type than on the selected CDPs, (2) most farms exhibited a low GM with low economic impact, and (3) there is a great likelihood that the CDPs facilitate the buildup of more resilient farming systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Sustainability Science offers insights into interactions within and between nature and the rest of human society, and the complex mechanisms that sustain both. The journal promotes science based predictions and impact assessments of global change, and seeks ways to ensure that such knowledge can be understood by society and be used to strengthen the resilience of global natural systems (such as ecosystems, ocean and atmospheric systems, nutrient cycles), social systems (economies, governments, industry) and human systems at the individual level (lifestyles, health, security, and human values).
期刊最新文献
Monitoring environmental sustainability in Japan: an ESGAP assessment Directing personal sustainability science toward subjective experience: conceptual, methodological, and normative cornerstones for a first-person inquiry into inner worlds Can security be sustainable? Three perspectives on security and social sustainability: paradox, co-production, and deconstruction Critical hydrologic impacts from climate change: addressing an urgent global need NUS so fast: the social and ecological implications of a rapidly developing indigenous food economy in the Cape Town area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1