Van-Quang Nguyen, Hoang D. Nguyen, Floriana Petrone, Duhee Park
{"title":"基于机器学习的地下箱形隧道损伤状态快速分类","authors":"Van-Quang Nguyen, Hoang D. Nguyen, Floriana Petrone, Duhee Park","doi":"10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study develops and compares the performance of eight machine learning (ML) models to rapidly predict the seismic damage state of underground box tunnels. Nonlinear time history analyses of 24 soil-tunnel configurations subject to 85 ground motions were performed to generate the dataset for the ML models. The aspect ratio, buried depth, flexibility ratio, and 23 ground motion intensity measures (IMs) are employed as input variables of ML models. The output variables are four damage states, namely ‘none’, ‘minor’, ‘moderate’, and ‘extensive’. Among the eight ML models, LightGBM is found to yield the most favorable prediction of the damage states, resulting in an accuracy of 91%. The effects of earthquake IMs were also examined. Results show that the spectral acceleration (Sa(T1)) and spectral displacement (Sd(T1)) at the fundamental period of the site (T1) have the strongest correlation with the damage prediction. Finally, the effect of reducing the input variables to two groups (i.e. combinations of soil-tunnel configuration parameters with top five and top ten ranked IMs) on the model prediction capability was investigated. Accordingly, Sd(T1), Sa(T1), acceleration spectrum intensity, spectral velocity, and velocity spectrum intensity were identified as the key parameters representing the ground-motion characteristics needed for the predictive model.Keywords: Box tunnelsgradient boosting methodsintensity measuresmachine learningnonlinear analysisseismic damage statesoil-tunnel interaction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) [No. 2022R1A2C3003245].","PeriodicalId":49468,"journal":{"name":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid damage state classification for underground box tunnels using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Van-Quang Nguyen, Hoang D. Nguyen, Floriana Petrone, Duhee Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis study develops and compares the performance of eight machine learning (ML) models to rapidly predict the seismic damage state of underground box tunnels. Nonlinear time history analyses of 24 soil-tunnel configurations subject to 85 ground motions were performed to generate the dataset for the ML models. The aspect ratio, buried depth, flexibility ratio, and 23 ground motion intensity measures (IMs) are employed as input variables of ML models. The output variables are four damage states, namely ‘none’, ‘minor’, ‘moderate’, and ‘extensive’. Among the eight ML models, LightGBM is found to yield the most favorable prediction of the damage states, resulting in an accuracy of 91%. The effects of earthquake IMs were also examined. Results show that the spectral acceleration (Sa(T1)) and spectral displacement (Sd(T1)) at the fundamental period of the site (T1) have the strongest correlation with the damage prediction. Finally, the effect of reducing the input variables to two groups (i.e. combinations of soil-tunnel configuration parameters with top five and top ten ranked IMs) on the model prediction capability was investigated. Accordingly, Sd(T1), Sa(T1), acceleration spectrum intensity, spectral velocity, and velocity spectrum intensity were identified as the key parameters representing the ground-motion characteristics needed for the predictive model.Keywords: Box tunnelsgradient boosting methodsintensity measuresmachine learningnonlinear analysisseismic damage statesoil-tunnel interaction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) [No. 2022R1A2C3003245].\",\"PeriodicalId\":49468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rapid damage state classification for underground box tunnels using machine learning
AbstractThis study develops and compares the performance of eight machine learning (ML) models to rapidly predict the seismic damage state of underground box tunnels. Nonlinear time history analyses of 24 soil-tunnel configurations subject to 85 ground motions were performed to generate the dataset for the ML models. The aspect ratio, buried depth, flexibility ratio, and 23 ground motion intensity measures (IMs) are employed as input variables of ML models. The output variables are four damage states, namely ‘none’, ‘minor’, ‘moderate’, and ‘extensive’. Among the eight ML models, LightGBM is found to yield the most favorable prediction of the damage states, resulting in an accuracy of 91%. The effects of earthquake IMs were also examined. Results show that the spectral acceleration (Sa(T1)) and spectral displacement (Sd(T1)) at the fundamental period of the site (T1) have the strongest correlation with the damage prediction. Finally, the effect of reducing the input variables to two groups (i.e. combinations of soil-tunnel configuration parameters with top five and top ten ranked IMs) on the model prediction capability was investigated. Accordingly, Sd(T1), Sa(T1), acceleration spectrum intensity, spectral velocity, and velocity spectrum intensity were identified as the key parameters representing the ground-motion characteristics needed for the predictive model.Keywords: Box tunnelsgradient boosting methodsintensity measuresmachine learningnonlinear analysisseismic damage statesoil-tunnel interaction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) [No. 2022R1A2C3003245].
期刊介绍:
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering - Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance is an international Journal dedicated to recent advances in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of a wide range of infrastructures, such as: buildings, bridges, dams, railways, underground constructions, offshore platforms, pipelines, naval vessels, ocean structures, nuclear power plants, airplanes and other types of structures including aerospace and automotive structures.
The Journal presents research and developments on the most advanced technologies for analyzing, predicting and optimizing infrastructure performance. The main gaps to be filled are those between researchers and practitioners in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of infrastructure systems, and those between professionals working on different types of infrastructures. To this end, the journal will provide a forum for a broad blend of scientific, technical and practical papers. The journal is endorsed by the International Association for Life-Cycle Civil Engineering ( IALCCE) and the International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety ( IABMAS).