基于机器学习的地下箱形隧道损伤状态快速分类

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structure and Infrastructure Engineering Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709
Van-Quang Nguyen, Hoang D. Nguyen, Floriana Petrone, Duhee Park
{"title":"基于机器学习的地下箱形隧道损伤状态快速分类","authors":"Van-Quang Nguyen, Hoang D. Nguyen, Floriana Petrone, Duhee Park","doi":"10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study develops and compares the performance of eight machine learning (ML) models to rapidly predict the seismic damage state of underground box tunnels. Nonlinear time history analyses of 24 soil-tunnel configurations subject to 85 ground motions were performed to generate the dataset for the ML models. The aspect ratio, buried depth, flexibility ratio, and 23 ground motion intensity measures (IMs) are employed as input variables of ML models. The output variables are four damage states, namely ‘none’, ‘minor’, ‘moderate’, and ‘extensive’. Among the eight ML models, LightGBM is found to yield the most favorable prediction of the damage states, resulting in an accuracy of 91%. The effects of earthquake IMs were also examined. Results show that the spectral acceleration (Sa(T1)) and spectral displacement (Sd(T1)) at the fundamental period of the site (T1) have the strongest correlation with the damage prediction. Finally, the effect of reducing the input variables to two groups (i.e. combinations of soil-tunnel configuration parameters with top five and top ten ranked IMs) on the model prediction capability was investigated. Accordingly, Sd(T1), Sa(T1), acceleration spectrum intensity, spectral velocity, and velocity spectrum intensity were identified as the key parameters representing the ground-motion characteristics needed for the predictive model.Keywords: Box tunnelsgradient boosting methodsintensity measuresmachine learningnonlinear analysisseismic damage statesoil-tunnel interaction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) [No. 2022R1A2C3003245].","PeriodicalId":49468,"journal":{"name":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid damage state classification for underground box tunnels using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Van-Quang Nguyen, Hoang D. Nguyen, Floriana Petrone, Duhee Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis study develops and compares the performance of eight machine learning (ML) models to rapidly predict the seismic damage state of underground box tunnels. Nonlinear time history analyses of 24 soil-tunnel configurations subject to 85 ground motions were performed to generate the dataset for the ML models. The aspect ratio, buried depth, flexibility ratio, and 23 ground motion intensity measures (IMs) are employed as input variables of ML models. The output variables are four damage states, namely ‘none’, ‘minor’, ‘moderate’, and ‘extensive’. Among the eight ML models, LightGBM is found to yield the most favorable prediction of the damage states, resulting in an accuracy of 91%. The effects of earthquake IMs were also examined. Results show that the spectral acceleration (Sa(T1)) and spectral displacement (Sd(T1)) at the fundamental period of the site (T1) have the strongest correlation with the damage prediction. Finally, the effect of reducing the input variables to two groups (i.e. combinations of soil-tunnel configuration parameters with top five and top ten ranked IMs) on the model prediction capability was investigated. Accordingly, Sd(T1), Sa(T1), acceleration spectrum intensity, spectral velocity, and velocity spectrum intensity were identified as the key parameters representing the ground-motion characteristics needed for the predictive model.Keywords: Box tunnelsgradient boosting methodsintensity measuresmachine learningnonlinear analysisseismic damage statesoil-tunnel interaction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) [No. 2022R1A2C3003245].\",\"PeriodicalId\":49468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2266709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究开发并比较了8种机器学习(ML)模型的性能,以快速预测地下箱形隧道的震害状态。通过85次地面运动对24种土隧道结构进行非线性时程分析,生成ML模型的数据集。采用长宽比、埋深、柔性比和23个地震动强度指标(IMs)作为ML模型的输入变量。输出变量是四种损害状态,即“无”、“轻微”、“中等”和“广泛”。在8个ML模型中,LightGBM模型对损伤状态的预测效果最好,准确率达到91%。研究了地震影响因子的影响。结果表明:在场地基本周期(T1)的谱加速度(Sa(T1))和谱位移(Sd(T1))与损伤预测的相关性最强;最后,研究了将输入变量减少为两组(即排名前5位和前10位IMs的土-隧道构型参数组合)对模型预测能力的影响。据此,确定了Sd(T1)、Sa(T1)、加速度谱强度、谱速度和速度谱强度是表征预测模型所需地震动特征的关键参数。关键词:箱形隧道;梯度增强方法;强度测量;机器学习;本研究由韩国国家研究基金会(NRF)资助,由韩国政府(MSIT) [No. 1]资助。2022 r1a2c3003245]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rapid damage state classification for underground box tunnels using machine learning
AbstractThis study develops and compares the performance of eight machine learning (ML) models to rapidly predict the seismic damage state of underground box tunnels. Nonlinear time history analyses of 24 soil-tunnel configurations subject to 85 ground motions were performed to generate the dataset for the ML models. The aspect ratio, buried depth, flexibility ratio, and 23 ground motion intensity measures (IMs) are employed as input variables of ML models. The output variables are four damage states, namely ‘none’, ‘minor’, ‘moderate’, and ‘extensive’. Among the eight ML models, LightGBM is found to yield the most favorable prediction of the damage states, resulting in an accuracy of 91%. The effects of earthquake IMs were also examined. Results show that the spectral acceleration (Sa(T1)) and spectral displacement (Sd(T1)) at the fundamental period of the site (T1) have the strongest correlation with the damage prediction. Finally, the effect of reducing the input variables to two groups (i.e. combinations of soil-tunnel configuration parameters with top five and top ten ranked IMs) on the model prediction capability was investigated. Accordingly, Sd(T1), Sa(T1), acceleration spectrum intensity, spectral velocity, and velocity spectrum intensity were identified as the key parameters representing the ground-motion characteristics needed for the predictive model.Keywords: Box tunnelsgradient boosting methodsintensity measuresmachine learningnonlinear analysisseismic damage statesoil-tunnel interaction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) [No. 2022R1A2C3003245].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
131
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Structure and Infrastructure Engineering - Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance is an international Journal dedicated to recent advances in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of a wide range of infrastructures, such as: buildings, bridges, dams, railways, underground constructions, offshore platforms, pipelines, naval vessels, ocean structures, nuclear power plants, airplanes and other types of structures including aerospace and automotive structures. The Journal presents research and developments on the most advanced technologies for analyzing, predicting and optimizing infrastructure performance. The main gaps to be filled are those between researchers and practitioners in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of infrastructure systems, and those between professionals working on different types of infrastructures. To this end, the journal will provide a forum for a broad blend of scientific, technical and practical papers. The journal is endorsed by the International Association for Life-Cycle Civil Engineering ( IALCCE) and the International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety ( IABMAS).
期刊最新文献
Vibration based dual-criteria damage detection method using deep neural networks in highway bridges with steel girders Numerical study on flexural behaviour of sulphate corroded RC beams strengthened with ultra-high-performance concrete A boosted deep learning-based approach for near real-time response estimation of structures under ground motion excitations Structural frequency-based maintenance management method for steel truss bridges under atmospheric corrosion Investigation of the time-dependent bearing capacities of concrete structures in different environments considering climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1