Biplab Kumar Datta, Steven S. Coughlin, Jihene Ayadi, Ban Majeed, Benjamin E. Ansa
{"title":"美国成人心血管风险人群中社会支持、生活满意度和吸烟状况的关系","authors":"Biplab Kumar Datta, Steven S. Coughlin, Jihene Ayadi, Ban Majeed, Benjamin E. Ansa","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2023.2259045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractSocial support and life satisfaction are important determinants of health behaviors and health outcomes. Cigarette smoking, a health risk behavior that increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, is deemed to have association with perceived social support and life satisfaction. This study assessed this relationship among US adults with one or more cardiovascular (CV) risks, namely, hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes, and obesity. Using nationally representative data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey on 17,557 adults with at least one CV risk, we examined whether individuals with low life-satisfaction and weak social-support were more likely to smoke compared to those with high life-satisfaction and strong social support. At different levels of social support (strong and weak), the odds of smoking were higher among individuals with low level of life satisfaction. Likewise, at different levels of life satisfaction (high, medium, and low), smoking prevalence was the highest among individuals with weak social support. Estimates of the multivariable logistic regressions, with controls for various demographic and socioeconomic correlates, suggested that the adjusted odds of current smoking for individuals with low life-satisfaction and weak social-support were 3.07 (95% CI: 2.34, 4.03) times that of individuals with high life-satisfaction and strong social support. This association was robust across all four CV risk factors, and across different sociodemographic (i.e., sex, age, race and ethnicity) and socioeconomic (i.e., income, urban/rural residence) sub-groups.Keywords: cardiovascular diseasediabeteshigh cholesterolhypertensionlife satisfactionobesitysmokingsocial support Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData used in this study are publicly available from the National Center for Health Statistics: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/2021nhis.htm.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between social support, life satisfaction, and smoking status among US adults with cardiovascular risks\",\"authors\":\"Biplab Kumar Datta, Steven S. Coughlin, Jihene Ayadi, Ban Majeed, Benjamin E. Ansa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08964289.2023.2259045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractSocial support and life satisfaction are important determinants of health behaviors and health outcomes. Cigarette smoking, a health risk behavior that increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, is deemed to have association with perceived social support and life satisfaction. This study assessed this relationship among US adults with one or more cardiovascular (CV) risks, namely, hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes, and obesity. Using nationally representative data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey on 17,557 adults with at least one CV risk, we examined whether individuals with low life-satisfaction and weak social-support were more likely to smoke compared to those with high life-satisfaction and strong social support. At different levels of social support (strong and weak), the odds of smoking were higher among individuals with low level of life satisfaction. Likewise, at different levels of life satisfaction (high, medium, and low), smoking prevalence was the highest among individuals with weak social support. Estimates of the multivariable logistic regressions, with controls for various demographic and socioeconomic correlates, suggested that the adjusted odds of current smoking for individuals with low life-satisfaction and weak social-support were 3.07 (95% CI: 2.34, 4.03) times that of individuals with high life-satisfaction and strong social support. This association was robust across all four CV risk factors, and across different sociodemographic (i.e., sex, age, race and ethnicity) and socioeconomic (i.e., income, urban/rural residence) sub-groups.Keywords: cardiovascular diseasediabeteshigh cholesterolhypertensionlife satisfactionobesitysmokingsocial support Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData used in this study are publicly available from the National Center for Health Statistics: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/2021nhis.htm.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2023.2259045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2023.2259045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要社会支持和生活满意度是健康行为和健康结果的重要决定因素。吸烟是一种增加心血管疾病风险的健康风险行为,被认为与感知的社会支持和生活满意度有关。本研究评估了具有一种或多种心血管(CV)风险(即高血压、高胆固醇、糖尿病和肥胖)的美国成年人的这种关系。我们使用2021年全国健康访谈调查(National Health Interview Survey)中具有全国代表性的数据,调查了17557名至少有一种CV风险的成年人,研究了与生活满意度高、社会支持强的人相比,生活满意度低、社会支持弱的人是否更有可能吸烟。同样,在不同的生活满意度水平(高、中、低)中,社会支持弱的个体吸烟率最高。对各种人口统计学和社会经济相关因素进行控制的多变量logistic回归估计表明,生活满意度低、社会支持弱的个体目前吸烟的调整几率是生活满意度高、社会支持强的个体的3.07倍(95% CI: 2.34, 4.03)。这种关联在所有四个心血管危险因素以及不同的社会人口统计学(即性别、年龄、种族和民族)和社会经济(即收入、城市/农村居住)亚组中都是稳健的。关键词:心血管疾病糖尿病高胆固醇高血压生活满意度肥胖吸烟社会支持披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。数据可用性声明本研究中使用的数据可从国家卫生统计中心公开获取:https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/2021nhis.htm.Additional信息资助本研究没有从公共、商业或非营利部门的资助机构获得任何特定的资助。
Relationship between social support, life satisfaction, and smoking status among US adults with cardiovascular risks
AbstractSocial support and life satisfaction are important determinants of health behaviors and health outcomes. Cigarette smoking, a health risk behavior that increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, is deemed to have association with perceived social support and life satisfaction. This study assessed this relationship among US adults with one or more cardiovascular (CV) risks, namely, hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes, and obesity. Using nationally representative data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey on 17,557 adults with at least one CV risk, we examined whether individuals with low life-satisfaction and weak social-support were more likely to smoke compared to those with high life-satisfaction and strong social support. At different levels of social support (strong and weak), the odds of smoking were higher among individuals with low level of life satisfaction. Likewise, at different levels of life satisfaction (high, medium, and low), smoking prevalence was the highest among individuals with weak social support. Estimates of the multivariable logistic regressions, with controls for various demographic and socioeconomic correlates, suggested that the adjusted odds of current smoking for individuals with low life-satisfaction and weak social-support were 3.07 (95% CI: 2.34, 4.03) times that of individuals with high life-satisfaction and strong social support. This association was robust across all four CV risk factors, and across different sociodemographic (i.e., sex, age, race and ethnicity) and socioeconomic (i.e., income, urban/rural residence) sub-groups.Keywords: cardiovascular diseasediabeteshigh cholesterolhypertensionlife satisfactionobesitysmokingsocial support Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData used in this study are publicly available from the National Center for Health Statistics: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/2021nhis.htm.Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
期刊介绍:
Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states.
Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.