各向异性、解剖区域和其他变量对骨质杨氏模量的影响:系统综述与元分析

IF 3.4 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1002/jbm4.10835
Krisztián Kovács, Szilárd Váncsa, Gergely Agócs, Andrea Harnos, Péter Hegyi, Viktor Weninger, Katinka Baross, Bence Kovács, Gergely Soós, György Kocsis
{"title":"各向异性、解剖区域和其他变量对骨质杨氏模量的影响:系统综述与元分析","authors":"Krisztián Kovács,&nbsp;Szilárd Váncsa,&nbsp;Gergely Agócs,&nbsp;Andrea Harnos,&nbsp;Péter Hegyi,&nbsp;Viktor Weninger,&nbsp;Katinka Baross,&nbsp;Bence Kovács,&nbsp;Gergely Soós,&nbsp;György Kocsis","doi":"10.1002/jbm4.10835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The importance of finite element analysis (FEA) is growing in orthopedic research, especially in implant design. However, Young's modulus (<i>E</i>) values, one of the most fundamental parameters, can range across a wide scale. Therefore, our study aimed to identify factors influencing <i>E</i> values in human bone specimens. We report our systematic review and meta-analysis based on the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline. We conducted the analysis on November 21, 2021. We included studies investigating healthy human bone specimens and reported on <i>E</i> values regarding demographic data, specimen characteristics, and measurement specifics. In addition, we included study types reporting individual specimen measurements. From the acquired data, we created a cohort in which we performed an exploratory data analysis that included the explanatory variables selected by random forest and regression trees methods, and the comparison of groups using independent samples Welch's <i>t</i> test. A total of 756 entries were included from 48 articles. Eleven different bones of the human body were included in these articles. The range of <i>E</i> values is between 0.008 and 33.7 GPa. The <i>E</i> values were most heavily influenced by the cortical or cancellous type of bone tested. Measuring method (compression, tension, bending, and nanoindentation), the anatomical region within a bone, the position of the bone within the skeleton, and the bone specimen size had a decreasing impact on the <i>E</i> values. Bone anisotropy, specimen condition, patient age, and sex were selected as important variables considering the value of <i>E</i>. On the basis of our results, <i>E</i> values of a bone change with bone characteristics, measurement techniques, and demographic variables. Therefore, the evaluation of FEA should be performed after the standardization of in vitro measurement protocol. © 2023 The Authors. <i>JBMR Plus</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm4.10835","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anisotropy, Anatomical Region, and Additional Variables Influence Young's Modulus of Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Krisztián Kovács,&nbsp;Szilárd Váncsa,&nbsp;Gergely Agócs,&nbsp;Andrea Harnos,&nbsp;Péter Hegyi,&nbsp;Viktor Weninger,&nbsp;Katinka Baross,&nbsp;Bence Kovács,&nbsp;Gergely Soós,&nbsp;György Kocsis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jbm4.10835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The importance of finite element analysis (FEA) is growing in orthopedic research, especially in implant design. However, Young's modulus (<i>E</i>) values, one of the most fundamental parameters, can range across a wide scale. Therefore, our study aimed to identify factors influencing <i>E</i> values in human bone specimens. We report our systematic review and meta-analysis based on the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline. We conducted the analysis on November 21, 2021. We included studies investigating healthy human bone specimens and reported on <i>E</i> values regarding demographic data, specimen characteristics, and measurement specifics. In addition, we included study types reporting individual specimen measurements. From the acquired data, we created a cohort in which we performed an exploratory data analysis that included the explanatory variables selected by random forest and regression trees methods, and the comparison of groups using independent samples Welch's <i>t</i> test. A total of 756 entries were included from 48 articles. Eleven different bones of the human body were included in these articles. The range of <i>E</i> values is between 0.008 and 33.7 GPa. The <i>E</i> values were most heavily influenced by the cortical or cancellous type of bone tested. Measuring method (compression, tension, bending, and nanoindentation), the anatomical region within a bone, the position of the bone within the skeleton, and the bone specimen size had a decreasing impact on the <i>E</i> values. Bone anisotropy, specimen condition, patient age, and sex were selected as important variables considering the value of <i>E</i>. On the basis of our results, <i>E</i> values of a bone change with bone characteristics, measurement techniques, and demographic variables. Therefore, the evaluation of FEA should be performed after the standardization of in vitro measurement protocol. © 2023 The Authors. <i>JBMR Plus</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"volume\":\"7 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm4.10835\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm4.10835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm4.10835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有限元分析(FEA)在整形外科研究中的重要性与日俱增,尤其是在植入物设计方面。然而,作为最基本的参数之一,杨氏模量(E)值的范围很广。因此,我们的研究旨在确定影响人体骨标本 E 值的因素。我们根据《2020 年系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南的建议报告了我们的系统综述和荟萃分析。我们于 2021 年 11 月 21 日进行了分析。我们纳入了调查健康人体骨骼标本的研究,并报告了有关人口统计学数据、标本特征和测量细节的 E 值。此外,我们还纳入了报告单个标本测量结果的研究类型。根据获得的数据,我们创建了一个队列,并在其中进行了探索性数据分析,包括通过随机森林和回归树方法选择解释变量,以及使用独立样本韦尔奇 t 检验进行组间比较。共收录了 48 篇文章中的 756 个条目。这些文章包括人体 11 种不同的骨骼。E 值范围在 0.008 到 33.7 GPa 之间。E值受测试骨骼的皮质或松质类型影响最大。测量方法(压缩、拉伸、弯曲和纳米压痕)、骨内的解剖区域、骨在骨骼中的位置以及骨试样大小对 E 值的影响依次递减。根据我们的研究结果,骨骼的 E 值会随着骨骼特征、测量技术和人口统计学变量的变化而变化。因此,应在体外测量方案标准化后再对 FEA 进行评估。© 2023 作者。JBMR Plus 由 Wiley Periodicals LLC 代表美国骨与矿物质研究学会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anisotropy, Anatomical Region, and Additional Variables Influence Young's Modulus of Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The importance of finite element analysis (FEA) is growing in orthopedic research, especially in implant design. However, Young's modulus (E) values, one of the most fundamental parameters, can range across a wide scale. Therefore, our study aimed to identify factors influencing E values in human bone specimens. We report our systematic review and meta-analysis based on the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline. We conducted the analysis on November 21, 2021. We included studies investigating healthy human bone specimens and reported on E values regarding demographic data, specimen characteristics, and measurement specifics. In addition, we included study types reporting individual specimen measurements. From the acquired data, we created a cohort in which we performed an exploratory data analysis that included the explanatory variables selected by random forest and regression trees methods, and the comparison of groups using independent samples Welch's t test. A total of 756 entries were included from 48 articles. Eleven different bones of the human body were included in these articles. The range of E values is between 0.008 and 33.7 GPa. The E values were most heavily influenced by the cortical or cancellous type of bone tested. Measuring method (compression, tension, bending, and nanoindentation), the anatomical region within a bone, the position of the bone within the skeleton, and the bone specimen size had a decreasing impact on the E values. Bone anisotropy, specimen condition, patient age, and sex were selected as important variables considering the value of E. On the basis of our results, E values of a bone change with bone characteristics, measurement techniques, and demographic variables. Therefore, the evaluation of FEA should be performed after the standardization of in vitro measurement protocol. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bone mineral density over ten years after primary parathyroidectomy in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Evaluating the relationship between glycemic control and bone fragility within the UK Biobank: observational and one-sample Mendelian randomization analyses. Correction to: Prevalence and risk factors for atypical femoral fracture among Lebanese patients with hip and shaft fractures. In nondiabetic C57BL/6J mice, canagliflozin affects the skeleton in a sex- and age-dependent manner. Genotype-phenotype correlations in 294 pediatric patients with osteogenesis imperfecta.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1