发育迟缓预测的机器学习模型

Sutarmi Sutarmi, Warijan Warijan, Tavip Indrayana, Dwi P. Putro B, Indra Gunawan
{"title":"发育迟缓预测的机器学习模型","authors":"Sutarmi Sutarmi, Warijan Warijan, Tavip Indrayana, Dwi P. Putro B, Indra Gunawan","doi":"10.46799/jhs.v4i9.1073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find the best Supervised Machine Learning (SML) model for stunting prediction. This research was conducted using an experimental approach using 192 infant data with a composition of 183 normal infant data and 9 stunted infant data using a custom dataset. The conclusion obtained from this study can be concluded that the combination of the Random Forest classification algorithm with Support Vector Machine Weighting and the Genetic Algorithm Feature Selection has the best performance. The parameters with the best performance are: The training and testing data distribution is 90% of the training data and 10% of the testing data. The number of trees in the random forest algorithm is 100, and the Gain Ratio criterion and max_depth is 10. In the Genetic Algorithm, the best parameters are: The Roulette Wheel selection method, the population is 20, the mutation value is 0.03, and the crossover value is 0.9. The validation method uses k-fold cross validation with a value of k = 10. Another conclusion is that there are 44 supporting factors for stunting, which, if we take a ranking of 10 in order of magnitude from largest to smallest, the supporting factors for stunting are 1.Baby's weight at birth. 2.Baby’s Height at Birth. 3.Number of meal per day. 4.Breast Milk. 5.Diarrhe times per 3 month. 6.Child development examination during covid by Health Worker at home. 7.Mother's age at birth. 8.Mother height at birth. 9.Number of sibling. 10.Age when the first food was given. This research has the disadvantage of no test on other datasets. So researchers do not know the reliability of findings is on different datasets","PeriodicalId":431769,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Health Sains","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Model For Stunting Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Sutarmi Sutarmi, Warijan Warijan, Tavip Indrayana, Dwi P. Putro B, Indra Gunawan\",\"doi\":\"10.46799/jhs.v4i9.1073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to find the best Supervised Machine Learning (SML) model for stunting prediction. This research was conducted using an experimental approach using 192 infant data with a composition of 183 normal infant data and 9 stunted infant data using a custom dataset. The conclusion obtained from this study can be concluded that the combination of the Random Forest classification algorithm with Support Vector Machine Weighting and the Genetic Algorithm Feature Selection has the best performance. The parameters with the best performance are: The training and testing data distribution is 90% of the training data and 10% of the testing data. The number of trees in the random forest algorithm is 100, and the Gain Ratio criterion and max_depth is 10. In the Genetic Algorithm, the best parameters are: The Roulette Wheel selection method, the population is 20, the mutation value is 0.03, and the crossover value is 0.9. The validation method uses k-fold cross validation with a value of k = 10. Another conclusion is that there are 44 supporting factors for stunting, which, if we take a ranking of 10 in order of magnitude from largest to smallest, the supporting factors for stunting are 1.Baby's weight at birth. 2.Baby’s Height at Birth. 3.Number of meal per day. 4.Breast Milk. 5.Diarrhe times per 3 month. 6.Child development examination during covid by Health Worker at home. 7.Mother's age at birth. 8.Mother height at birth. 9.Number of sibling. 10.Age when the first food was given. This research has the disadvantage of no test on other datasets. So researchers do not know the reliability of findings is on different datasets\",\"PeriodicalId\":431769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Health Sains\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Health Sains\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46799/jhs.v4i9.1073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Health Sains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46799/jhs.v4i9.1073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在寻找用于发育迟缓预测的最佳监督机器学习(SML)模型。本研究采用实验方法,使用自定义数据集,使用192个婴儿数据,其中183个正常婴儿数据和9个发育不良婴儿数据组成。从本研究得出的结论可以得出,支持向量机加权的随机森林分类算法与遗传算法特征选择相结合的方法具有最佳的性能。性能最好的参数有:训练和测试数据分布分别为训练数据的90%和测试数据的10%。随机森林算法中的树数为100,增益比准则和max_depth为10。在遗传算法中,最佳参数为:轮盘选择法,种群为20,突变值为0.03,交叉值为0.9。验证方法使用k-fold交叉验证,值k = 10。另一个结论是发育不良的支持因素有44个,如果按照从大到小的10个数量级排序,发育不良的支持因素为1。婴儿出生时的体重。2.婴儿出生时的身高。每天吃多少顿饭。4.母乳。每3个月腹泻数次。6.卫生工作者在家中对covid期间的儿童进行发育检查。7.母亲出生时的年龄。8.母亲出生时的身高。9.兄弟姐妹数目。10.第一次吃东西时的年龄。本研究的缺点是没有对其他数据集进行测试。因此,研究人员不知道研究结果的可靠性取决于不同的数据集
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning Model For Stunting Prediction
This study aims to find the best Supervised Machine Learning (SML) model for stunting prediction. This research was conducted using an experimental approach using 192 infant data with a composition of 183 normal infant data and 9 stunted infant data using a custom dataset. The conclusion obtained from this study can be concluded that the combination of the Random Forest classification algorithm with Support Vector Machine Weighting and the Genetic Algorithm Feature Selection has the best performance. The parameters with the best performance are: The training and testing data distribution is 90% of the training data and 10% of the testing data. The number of trees in the random forest algorithm is 100, and the Gain Ratio criterion and max_depth is 10. In the Genetic Algorithm, the best parameters are: The Roulette Wheel selection method, the population is 20, the mutation value is 0.03, and the crossover value is 0.9. The validation method uses k-fold cross validation with a value of k = 10. Another conclusion is that there are 44 supporting factors for stunting, which, if we take a ranking of 10 in order of magnitude from largest to smallest, the supporting factors for stunting are 1.Baby's weight at birth. 2.Baby’s Height at Birth. 3.Number of meal per day. 4.Breast Milk. 5.Diarrhe times per 3 month. 6.Child development examination during covid by Health Worker at home. 7.Mother's age at birth. 8.Mother height at birth. 9.Number of sibling. 10.Age when the first food was given. This research has the disadvantage of no test on other datasets. So researchers do not know the reliability of findings is on different datasets
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Nurse Burnout and Patient Safety Culture with The Quality of Nursing Care in Type B Hospitals in Central Sulawesi The Effect of Animated Video Learning on ESI Triage Knowledge and Student Satisfaction of Nursing Polytechnic Health Ministry of Health Makassar Experience of Breastfeeding And Exclusive Breastfeeding For Women With Physical Disabilities: Scoping Review Comparison of Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of ISS, RTS, and TRISS Instruments in Predicting Mortality of Trauma Patients Differences Between Discovery Learning And Case-Based Learning Using Animated Videos On Critical Thinking Skills In Start Triage Among Undergraduate Nursing Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1