A16“不怕说死”:通过模拟汇报分享姑息治疗讨论的关键词汇

Amy Huggin, Deepta Churm, Lucy Robinson, Laura Massey, Owain Leng
{"title":"A16“不怕说死”:通过模拟汇报分享姑息治疗讨论的关键词汇","authors":"Amy Huggin, Deepta Churm, Lucy Robinson, Laura Massey, Owain Leng","doi":"10.54531/lwvr1443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulation as a learning platform is recognized internationally as beneficial in terms of education, training and assessment of doctors [1,2]. This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a novel Palliative Medicine simulation session as a tool for Foundation Year 2 (FY2) doctors to gain competency and confidence in the assessment and management of life-limiting illness. We designed the palliative care (PC) simulation session based on the FY2 curriculum. The three scenarios involved management of opioid toxicity, breaking bad news and shared decision-making with a role-play patient with a gastrointestinal bleed. Session faculty included a mix of healthcare professionals, but always included a PC specialist. We evaluated the session using a pre- and post-session questionnaire collecting data using 5-point Likert scales and free-text comments. We analysed qualitative data using content analysis. Researcher and methodological triangulation increased the credibility of the findings. The three prevalent themes noted from the pre-content analysis were Communication, Prognostication and the Process of complex decision-making. Comments such as ‘Senior colleagues hesitant to have escalation discussions’ and ‘I find it difficult when the patient has a very different idea of how poorly they are’ were examples of quotes given by candidates as pre-session challenges. 95.6% of our candidates felt that the session addressed these challenges, mainly through the debrief process. The main learning points articulated were in relation to prescribing and communication skills. Candidates expressed the importance of ‘picking up communication techniques and phrases’. The debrief was the most highly valued, and frequently mentioned positive element of the content analysis. ‘Open discussions’ was mentioned on numerous occasions, ‘I felt comfortable asking questions’ and ‘Discussion after SIM was very useful’, all support the importance of skilled debrief. FY2 doctors identified communication as their biggest concern when managing Palliative Care patients. Our session addressed this through open and frank debrief discussion. This allowed reflection on previous experience and peer-to-peer learning of key vocabulary when talking to patients with a limited prognosis. Further qualitative evaluation of the impact of this session on clinical practice and how peer learning could be incorporated into day-to-day skills development on the wards would be of value. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"1 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A16 ‘Not being afraid of saying dying’: sharing key vocabulary for palliative care discussions through simulation debrief\",\"authors\":\"Amy Huggin, Deepta Churm, Lucy Robinson, Laura Massey, Owain Leng\",\"doi\":\"10.54531/lwvr1443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Simulation as a learning platform is recognized internationally as beneficial in terms of education, training and assessment of doctors [1,2]. This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a novel Palliative Medicine simulation session as a tool for Foundation Year 2 (FY2) doctors to gain competency and confidence in the assessment and management of life-limiting illness. We designed the palliative care (PC) simulation session based on the FY2 curriculum. The three scenarios involved management of opioid toxicity, breaking bad news and shared decision-making with a role-play patient with a gastrointestinal bleed. Session faculty included a mix of healthcare professionals, but always included a PC specialist. We evaluated the session using a pre- and post-session questionnaire collecting data using 5-point Likert scales and free-text comments. We analysed qualitative data using content analysis. Researcher and methodological triangulation increased the credibility of the findings. The three prevalent themes noted from the pre-content analysis were Communication, Prognostication and the Process of complex decision-making. Comments such as ‘Senior colleagues hesitant to have escalation discussions’ and ‘I find it difficult when the patient has a very different idea of how poorly they are’ were examples of quotes given by candidates as pre-session challenges. 95.6% of our candidates felt that the session addressed these challenges, mainly through the debrief process. The main learning points articulated were in relation to prescribing and communication skills. Candidates expressed the importance of ‘picking up communication techniques and phrases’. The debrief was the most highly valued, and frequently mentioned positive element of the content analysis. ‘Open discussions’ was mentioned on numerous occasions, ‘I felt comfortable asking questions’ and ‘Discussion after SIM was very useful’, all support the importance of skilled debrief. FY2 doctors identified communication as their biggest concern when managing Palliative Care patients. Our session addressed this through open and frank debrief discussion. This allowed reflection on previous experience and peer-to-peer learning of key vocabulary when talking to patients with a limited prognosis. Further qualitative evaluation of the impact of this session on clinical practice and how peer learning could be incorporated into day-to-day skills development on the wards would be of value. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54531/lwvr1443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/lwvr1443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

模拟作为一种学习平台,在医生的教育、培训和评估方面被国际公认为是有益的[1,2]。本研究旨在介绍和评估一种新的姑息医学模拟课程,作为基础二年级(FY2)医生获得评估和管理限制生命疾病的能力和信心的工具。我们根据FY2课程设计了姑息治疗(PC)模拟课程。这三种场景涉及阿片类药物毒性的管理,突发坏消息以及与患有胃肠道出血的角色扮演患者共同决策。会议教师包括医疗保健专业人员,但总是包括一个个人电脑专家。我们使用5点李克特量表和自由文本评论收集数据的会前和会后问卷来评估会议。我们使用内容分析来分析定性数据。研究者和方法论三角测量增加了研究结果的可信度。从内容前分析中指出的三个普遍主题是沟通、预测和复杂决策过程。面试者在面试前提出的挑战中引用了一些例子,比如“资深同事在讨论升级问题时犹豫不决”,“当病人对自己的情况有完全不同的看法时,我觉得很难做到”。95.6%的候选人认为会议主要通过汇报过程解决了这些挑战。所阐述的主要学习要点与处方和沟通技巧有关。求职者表示“学习沟通技巧和表达方式”的重要性。汇报是内容分析中最受重视、最常被提及的积极因素。“公开讨论”在很多场合被提到,“我觉得提问很舒服”和“SIM后的讨论非常有用”,这些都证明了熟练汇报的重要性。FY2医生认为沟通是他们在管理姑息治疗患者时最关心的问题。我们的会议通过公开和坦率的汇报讨论解决了这个问题。这允许在与预后有限的患者交谈时反思以前的经验和对等学习关键词汇。进一步对本次会议对临床实践的影响进行定性评估,以及如何将同行学习纳入病房的日常技能发展,将是有价值的。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A16 ‘Not being afraid of saying dying’: sharing key vocabulary for palliative care discussions through simulation debrief
Simulation as a learning platform is recognized internationally as beneficial in terms of education, training and assessment of doctors [1,2]. This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a novel Palliative Medicine simulation session as a tool for Foundation Year 2 (FY2) doctors to gain competency and confidence in the assessment and management of life-limiting illness. We designed the palliative care (PC) simulation session based on the FY2 curriculum. The three scenarios involved management of opioid toxicity, breaking bad news and shared decision-making with a role-play patient with a gastrointestinal bleed. Session faculty included a mix of healthcare professionals, but always included a PC specialist. We evaluated the session using a pre- and post-session questionnaire collecting data using 5-point Likert scales and free-text comments. We analysed qualitative data using content analysis. Researcher and methodological triangulation increased the credibility of the findings. The three prevalent themes noted from the pre-content analysis were Communication, Prognostication and the Process of complex decision-making. Comments such as ‘Senior colleagues hesitant to have escalation discussions’ and ‘I find it difficult when the patient has a very different idea of how poorly they are’ were examples of quotes given by candidates as pre-session challenges. 95.6% of our candidates felt that the session addressed these challenges, mainly through the debrief process. The main learning points articulated were in relation to prescribing and communication skills. Candidates expressed the importance of ‘picking up communication techniques and phrases’. The debrief was the most highly valued, and frequently mentioned positive element of the content analysis. ‘Open discussions’ was mentioned on numerous occasions, ‘I felt comfortable asking questions’ and ‘Discussion after SIM was very useful’, all support the importance of skilled debrief. FY2 doctors identified communication as their biggest concern when managing Palliative Care patients. Our session addressed this through open and frank debrief discussion. This allowed reflection on previous experience and peer-to-peer learning of key vocabulary when talking to patients with a limited prognosis. Further qualitative evaluation of the impact of this session on clinical practice and how peer learning could be incorporated into day-to-day skills development on the wards would be of value. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pilot study comparing immersive virtual reality simulation and computerized virtual patient simulation in undergraduate medical education Use of prebriefing in simulation-based experience for nursing education: a scoping review Cross-discipline teaching and learning of cardiology through an augmented reality application The effectiveness and efficiency of using ChatGPT for writing health care simulations A75 Strengthening simulation quality assurance through the ‘Sim QA bundle’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1