A71 .联合制作的基于模拟的围产期心理健康方案的评价

Labib Hussain, Maaz Malik, Jennifer Cooke
{"title":"A71 .联合制作的基于模拟的围产期心理健康方案的评价","authors":"Labib Hussain, Maaz Malik, Jennifer Cooke","doi":"10.54531/scab6994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NHS England’s Long-Term Plan for Mental Health highlights need to develop PNMH services and train staff ensuring service user involvement [1]. Women experiencing PNMH disorders often initially present to non-specialist healthcare professionals (NSHCP), meaning that they need specific training in assessment and management of PNMH disorders. A co-produced and co-facilitated simulation-based training programme in perinatal mental health was developed in 2019 by Sussex Partnership Specialist Perinatal Service in conjunction with University Hospital’s Sussex Simulation team. Primary Aim: Evaluate self-reported changes in confidence and competence of learners attending perinatal mental-health (PNMH) simulation training across multiple domains relating to assessment and management of PNMH problems. Secondary Aims: Evaluate impact of service user co-facilitation on PNMH simulation training; Assess whether participant demographics reflect training’s target professional groups. Service User Consultants (SUCs) were employed as faculty members and trained in simulation facilitation alongside professional faculty. Scenarios were developed in a multidisciplinary workshop, and aligned to the Health Education England (HEE) Competency framework in PNMH. Courses were co-facilitated by a Perinatal Psychiatrist and SUC. Data on participants’ confidence and knowledge across the competency framework domains was collated using a survey monkey questionnaire, pre and post-course. 242 responses were collected from participants from more than ten different staff groups e.g. junior doctors, (18%), health visitors (17%) & midwives (26%). Participant confidence improved significantly across all training domains. 93.5% of participants graded contribution of SUCs either useful or very-useful. 99.2% found the simulation training useful or very-useful, with all participants agreeing their future practice would consequently change. The simulation-based training programme increased confidence and understanding of NSHCPs from across the PNMH care pathway, on a number of domains set by HEE PNMH competency framework. Participants were overwhelmingly in support of SUC involvement in the provision of valuable training which resembled real-life clinical encounters via scenarios.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"130 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A71 Evaluation of a co-produced Simulation Based Perinatal Mental Health Programme\",\"authors\":\"Labib Hussain, Maaz Malik, Jennifer Cooke\",\"doi\":\"10.54531/scab6994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"NHS England’s Long-Term Plan for Mental Health highlights need to develop PNMH services and train staff ensuring service user involvement [1]. Women experiencing PNMH disorders often initially present to non-specialist healthcare professionals (NSHCP), meaning that they need specific training in assessment and management of PNMH disorders. A co-produced and co-facilitated simulation-based training programme in perinatal mental health was developed in 2019 by Sussex Partnership Specialist Perinatal Service in conjunction with University Hospital’s Sussex Simulation team. Primary Aim: Evaluate self-reported changes in confidence and competence of learners attending perinatal mental-health (PNMH) simulation training across multiple domains relating to assessment and management of PNMH problems. Secondary Aims: Evaluate impact of service user co-facilitation on PNMH simulation training; Assess whether participant demographics reflect training’s target professional groups. Service User Consultants (SUCs) were employed as faculty members and trained in simulation facilitation alongside professional faculty. Scenarios were developed in a multidisciplinary workshop, and aligned to the Health Education England (HEE) Competency framework in PNMH. Courses were co-facilitated by a Perinatal Psychiatrist and SUC. Data on participants’ confidence and knowledge across the competency framework domains was collated using a survey monkey questionnaire, pre and post-course. 242 responses were collected from participants from more than ten different staff groups e.g. junior doctors, (18%), health visitors (17%) & midwives (26%). Participant confidence improved significantly across all training domains. 93.5% of participants graded contribution of SUCs either useful or very-useful. 99.2% found the simulation training useful or very-useful, with all participants agreeing their future practice would consequently change. The simulation-based training programme increased confidence and understanding of NSHCPs from across the PNMH care pathway, on a number of domains set by HEE PNMH competency framework. Participants were overwhelmingly in support of SUC involvement in the provision of valuable training which resembled real-life clinical encounters via scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"volume\":\"130 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54531/scab6994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/scab6994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国国民保健服务体系的精神卫生长期计划强调需要发展PNMH服务并培训工作人员,确保服务用户参与[1]。患有PNMH疾病的妇女最初往往向非专业保健专业人员(NSHCP)就诊,这意味着她们需要在评估和管理PNMH疾病方面接受专门培训。2019年,苏塞克斯伙伴关系专家围产期服务中心与大学医院的苏塞克斯模拟团队共同制定了一项基于模拟的围产期心理健康培训计划。主要目的:评估参加围产期心理健康(PNMH)模拟训练的学习者在与PNMH问题评估和管理相关的多个领域的自信和能力的自我报告变化。次要目的:评估服务用户协同促进对PNMH模拟训练的影响;评估参与者的人口统计是否反映了培训的目标专业群体。服务用户顾问(suc)被聘为教师,并与专业教师一起接受模拟促进方面的培训。方案是在一个多学科研讨会上制定的,并与PNMH的英格兰健康教育(HEE)能力框架保持一致。课程由一名围产期精神病学家和SUC共同主持。在课程前和课程后,使用调查猴子问卷对参与者在能力框架领域的信心和知识进行了整理。从10多个不同工作人员群体的参与者中收集了242份答复,例如初级医生(18%)、保健访问者(17%)和;助产士(26%)。参与者的信心在所有培训领域都有显著提高。93.5%的参与者认为suc的贡献有用或非常有用。99.2%的人认为模拟训练有用或非常有用,所有参与者都同意他们未来的实践将因此改变。以模拟为基础的培训计划增加了来自整个PNMH护理途径的nshcp的信心和理解,以及HEE PNMH能力框架设定的一些领域。与会者绝大多数支持SUC参与提供宝贵的培训,通过场景模拟真实的临床接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A71 Evaluation of a co-produced Simulation Based Perinatal Mental Health Programme
NHS England’s Long-Term Plan for Mental Health highlights need to develop PNMH services and train staff ensuring service user involvement [1]. Women experiencing PNMH disorders often initially present to non-specialist healthcare professionals (NSHCP), meaning that they need specific training in assessment and management of PNMH disorders. A co-produced and co-facilitated simulation-based training programme in perinatal mental health was developed in 2019 by Sussex Partnership Specialist Perinatal Service in conjunction with University Hospital’s Sussex Simulation team. Primary Aim: Evaluate self-reported changes in confidence and competence of learners attending perinatal mental-health (PNMH) simulation training across multiple domains relating to assessment and management of PNMH problems. Secondary Aims: Evaluate impact of service user co-facilitation on PNMH simulation training; Assess whether participant demographics reflect training’s target professional groups. Service User Consultants (SUCs) were employed as faculty members and trained in simulation facilitation alongside professional faculty. Scenarios were developed in a multidisciplinary workshop, and aligned to the Health Education England (HEE) Competency framework in PNMH. Courses were co-facilitated by a Perinatal Psychiatrist and SUC. Data on participants’ confidence and knowledge across the competency framework domains was collated using a survey monkey questionnaire, pre and post-course. 242 responses were collected from participants from more than ten different staff groups e.g. junior doctors, (18%), health visitors (17%) & midwives (26%). Participant confidence improved significantly across all training domains. 93.5% of participants graded contribution of SUCs either useful or very-useful. 99.2% found the simulation training useful or very-useful, with all participants agreeing their future practice would consequently change. The simulation-based training programme increased confidence and understanding of NSHCPs from across the PNMH care pathway, on a number of domains set by HEE PNMH competency framework. Participants were overwhelmingly in support of SUC involvement in the provision of valuable training which resembled real-life clinical encounters via scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pilot study comparing immersive virtual reality simulation and computerized virtual patient simulation in undergraduate medical education Use of prebriefing in simulation-based experience for nursing education: a scoping review Cross-discipline teaching and learning of cardiology through an augmented reality application The effectiveness and efficiency of using ChatGPT for writing health care simulations A75 Strengthening simulation quality assurance through the ‘Sim QA bundle’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1