在全球南方城市实施土地价值获取:对巴西圣保罗市经验的评价

Eduardo Alberto Cusce Nobre
{"title":"在全球南方城市实施土地价值获取:对巴西<s:1>圣保罗市经验的评价","authors":"Eduardo Alberto Cusce Nobre","doi":"10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202327en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of land value capture (LVC) tools has been advocated by many authors as way of financing public investments in urban interventions. The rationale behind these tools is to capture part of the capital gains on land derived from public sector interventions in urban development, such as implementing infrastructure or changing land use regulations. They may be of great significance in very limited budget environments such as in countries undergoing rapid urbanization that need to provide a great amount of infrastructure and urban services in order to accommodate urban growth. Since the 1980s, the City of São Paulo, Brazil, has been implementing LVC through a wide range of different tools. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of two of these tools, the Building Rights Levy (OODC – Outorga Onerosa do Direito de Construir) and the Additional Building Rights Certificates (CEPAC – Certificado de Potencial Adicional Construtivo), from 1995 until 2020. Rather than evaluating these instruments just from a revenue viewpoint, the study also sets out to analyze how effective they have been in reducing social disparities, considering the location and type of investments undertaken.","PeriodicalId":31850,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais","volume":"2 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing land value capture in a Global South city: evaluation of the experience in the City of São Paulo, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Alberto Cusce Nobre\",\"doi\":\"10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202327en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of land value capture (LVC) tools has been advocated by many authors as way of financing public investments in urban interventions. The rationale behind these tools is to capture part of the capital gains on land derived from public sector interventions in urban development, such as implementing infrastructure or changing land use regulations. They may be of great significance in very limited budget environments such as in countries undergoing rapid urbanization that need to provide a great amount of infrastructure and urban services in order to accommodate urban growth. Since the 1980s, the City of São Paulo, Brazil, has been implementing LVC through a wide range of different tools. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of two of these tools, the Building Rights Levy (OODC – Outorga Onerosa do Direito de Construir) and the Additional Building Rights Certificates (CEPAC – Certificado de Potencial Adicional Construtivo), from 1995 until 2020. Rather than evaluating these instruments just from a revenue viewpoint, the study also sets out to analyze how effective they have been in reducing social disparities, considering the location and type of investments undertaken.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202327en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202327en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多作者都提倡使用土地价值获取(LVC)工具为城市干预中的公共投资融资。这些工具背后的基本原理是获取公共部门对城市发展的干预所产生的部分土地资本收益,例如实施基础设施或改变土地使用法规。在预算非常有限的环境中,例如在正在快速城市化的国家,这些国家需要提供大量的基础设施和城市服务,以适应城市增长,它们可能具有重要意义。自20世纪80年代以来,巴西圣保罗市一直在通过各种不同的工具实施LVC。本文的目的是评估其中两个工具的实施情况,即建筑权利征费(OODC - Outorga Onerosa do Direito de construcir)和附加建筑权利证书(CEPAC - Certificado de潜在额外建设证书),从1995年到2020年。这项研究不仅从收入的角度来评估这些工具,还考虑到所进行投资的地点和类型,分析了它们在减少社会差距方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementing land value capture in a Global South city: evaluation of the experience in the City of São Paulo, Brazil
The use of land value capture (LVC) tools has been advocated by many authors as way of financing public investments in urban interventions. The rationale behind these tools is to capture part of the capital gains on land derived from public sector interventions in urban development, such as implementing infrastructure or changing land use regulations. They may be of great significance in very limited budget environments such as in countries undergoing rapid urbanization that need to provide a great amount of infrastructure and urban services in order to accommodate urban growth. Since the 1980s, the City of São Paulo, Brazil, has been implementing LVC through a wide range of different tools. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of two of these tools, the Building Rights Levy (OODC – Outorga Onerosa do Direito de Construir) and the Additional Building Rights Certificates (CEPAC – Certificado de Potencial Adicional Construtivo), from 1995 until 2020. Rather than evaluating these instruments just from a revenue viewpoint, the study also sets out to analyze how effective they have been in reducing social disparities, considering the location and type of investments undertaken.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transformações no setor de saneamento no Estado do Rio de Janeiro: neoliberalização e mudanças regulatórias Transformations in the sanitation sector in the State of Rio de Janeiro: neoliberalism and regulatory changes Avaliação de desenho dos incentivos fiscais federais para o desenvolvimento regional Neoextractivism and corporate authoritarianism in the resettlement process of Bento Rodrigues, Mariana-MG Neoextrativismo e autoritarismo corporativo no processo de reassentamento de Bento Rodrigues, Mariana-MG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1