Maotao Yang, Mingming Guo, Yi Zhang, Ye Tian, Miaorong Yi, Jialing Le, Hua Zhang
{"title":"基于贝叶斯优化算法的超音速流中 SST 湍流模型参数的不确定性量化与识别","authors":"Maotao Yang, Mingming Guo, Yi Zhang, Ye Tian, Miaorong Yi, Jialing Le, Hua Zhang","doi":"10.1002/fld.5245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model is the main model in engineering applications today. However, the normal value of the closure coefficient of the RANS turbulence model is determined based on some simple basic flows and may no longer be applicable for complex flows. In this paper, the closure coefficient of shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model is recalibrated by combining Bayesian method and particle swarm optimization algorithm, so as to improve the numerical simulation accuracy of wall pressure in supersonic flow. First, the obtained prior samples were numerically calculated, and the Sobol index of the closure coefficient was calculated by sensitivity analysis method to characterize the sensitivity of the wall pressure to the model parameters. Second, combined with the uncertainty of propagation parameters by non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC). Finally, Bayesian optimization is used to quantify the uncertainty and obtain the maximum likelihood function estimation and optimal parameters. The results show that the maximum relative error of wall pressure predicted by the SST turbulence model decreases from 29.71% to 9.00%, and the average relative error decreases from 9.86% to 3.67% through the parameter calibration of Bayesian optimization method. In addition, the system evaluated the calibration effect of three criteria, and the calibration results parameters under the three criteria were all better than the calculated results of the nominal values. Meanwhile, the velocity profile and density profile of the flow field were also analyzed. Finally, the same calibration method was applied to the supersonic hollow cylinder and BSL (Baseline) turbulence model, and the same calibration results were obtained, which verified the universality of the calibration method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty quantification and identification of SST turbulence model parameters based on Bayesian optimization algorithm in supersonic flow\",\"authors\":\"Maotao Yang, Mingming Guo, Yi Zhang, Ye Tian, Miaorong Yi, Jialing Le, Hua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fld.5245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model is the main model in engineering applications today. However, the normal value of the closure coefficient of the RANS turbulence model is determined based on some simple basic flows and may no longer be applicable for complex flows. In this paper, the closure coefficient of shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model is recalibrated by combining Bayesian method and particle swarm optimization algorithm, so as to improve the numerical simulation accuracy of wall pressure in supersonic flow. First, the obtained prior samples were numerically calculated, and the Sobol index of the closure coefficient was calculated by sensitivity analysis method to characterize the sensitivity of the wall pressure to the model parameters. Second, combined with the uncertainty of propagation parameters by non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC). Finally, Bayesian optimization is used to quantify the uncertainty and obtain the maximum likelihood function estimation and optimal parameters. The results show that the maximum relative error of wall pressure predicted by the SST turbulence model decreases from 29.71% to 9.00%, and the average relative error decreases from 9.86% to 3.67% through the parameter calibration of Bayesian optimization method. In addition, the system evaluated the calibration effect of three criteria, and the calibration results parameters under the three criteria were all better than the calculated results of the nominal values. Meanwhile, the velocity profile and density profile of the flow field were also analyzed. Finally, the same calibration method was applied to the supersonic hollow cylinder and BSL (Baseline) turbulence model, and the same calibration results were obtained, which verified the universality of the calibration method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5245\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uncertainty quantification and identification of SST turbulence model parameters based on Bayesian optimization algorithm in supersonic flow
The Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model is the main model in engineering applications today. However, the normal value of the closure coefficient of the RANS turbulence model is determined based on some simple basic flows and may no longer be applicable for complex flows. In this paper, the closure coefficient of shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model is recalibrated by combining Bayesian method and particle swarm optimization algorithm, so as to improve the numerical simulation accuracy of wall pressure in supersonic flow. First, the obtained prior samples were numerically calculated, and the Sobol index of the closure coefficient was calculated by sensitivity analysis method to characterize the sensitivity of the wall pressure to the model parameters. Second, combined with the uncertainty of propagation parameters by non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC). Finally, Bayesian optimization is used to quantify the uncertainty and obtain the maximum likelihood function estimation and optimal parameters. The results show that the maximum relative error of wall pressure predicted by the SST turbulence model decreases from 29.71% to 9.00%, and the average relative error decreases from 9.86% to 3.67% through the parameter calibration of Bayesian optimization method. In addition, the system evaluated the calibration effect of three criteria, and the calibration results parameters under the three criteria were all better than the calculated results of the nominal values. Meanwhile, the velocity profile and density profile of the flow field were also analyzed. Finally, the same calibration method was applied to the supersonic hollow cylinder and BSL (Baseline) turbulence model, and the same calibration results were obtained, which verified the universality of the calibration method.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction.
Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review.
The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.