肥料硫酸铵,磷酸二铵和尿素的氧化亚氮排放因子

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1080/00288233.2023.2277916
Jiafa Luo, Tony van der Weerden, Surinder Saggar, Hong J. Di, Andriy Podolyan, Kamal Adhikari, Keren Ding, Stuart Lindsey, Dongwen Luo, Lily Ouyang, Alison Rutherford
{"title":"肥料硫酸铵,磷酸二铵和尿素的氧化亚氮排放因子","authors":"Jiafa Luo, Tony van der Weerden, Surinder Saggar, Hong J. Di, Andriy Podolyan, Kamal Adhikari, Keren Ding, Stuart Lindsey, Dongwen Luo, Lily Ouyang, Alison Rutherford","doi":"10.1080/00288233.2023.2277916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study determined the nitrous oxide emission factors (EF1, the percentage of N2O emitted as a proportion of fertiliser N applied) for fertilisers ammonium sulphate (AS), diammonium phosphate (DAP), and urea under the same field conditions. Trials were conducted on pasture soils across four sites (Waikato, Manawatu, Canterbury and Otago) in New Zealand during late autumn and spring of 2022. The average EF1 values for urea across all four sites were 0.128% (95% C.I., 0.023% and 0.249%) in late autumn and 0.136% (95% C.I., 0.031% and 0.259%) in spring. The corresponding EF1 values for AS were 0.125% (95% C.I., – 0.021% and 0.246%) in late autumn and 0.083% (95% C.I., 0.015% and 0.197%) in spring, while for DAP, they were 0.049% (95% C.I., – 0.044% and 0.157%) in late autumn and 0.090% (95% C.I., -0.009% and 0.205%) in spring. The mean EF1 values across all four sites and two seasons were calculated as 0.132% (95% C.I., 0.016% and 0.269%) for urea, 0.104% (95% C.I., – 0.008% and 0.235%) for AS, and 0.069% (95% C.I., – 0.036 and 0.194) for DAP. No significant differences in EF1 were observed between the three fertilisers (P > 0.05) at individual sites or when considering all four sites collectively.","PeriodicalId":19287,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"29 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrous oxide emission factors for fertiliser ammonium sulphate, diammonium phosphate, and urea\",\"authors\":\"Jiafa Luo, Tony van der Weerden, Surinder Saggar, Hong J. Di, Andriy Podolyan, Kamal Adhikari, Keren Ding, Stuart Lindsey, Dongwen Luo, Lily Ouyang, Alison Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00288233.2023.2277916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study determined the nitrous oxide emission factors (EF1, the percentage of N2O emitted as a proportion of fertiliser N applied) for fertilisers ammonium sulphate (AS), diammonium phosphate (DAP), and urea under the same field conditions. Trials were conducted on pasture soils across four sites (Waikato, Manawatu, Canterbury and Otago) in New Zealand during late autumn and spring of 2022. The average EF1 values for urea across all four sites were 0.128% (95% C.I., 0.023% and 0.249%) in late autumn and 0.136% (95% C.I., 0.031% and 0.259%) in spring. The corresponding EF1 values for AS were 0.125% (95% C.I., – 0.021% and 0.246%) in late autumn and 0.083% (95% C.I., 0.015% and 0.197%) in spring, while for DAP, they were 0.049% (95% C.I., – 0.044% and 0.157%) in late autumn and 0.090% (95% C.I., -0.009% and 0.205%) in spring. The mean EF1 values across all four sites and two seasons were calculated as 0.132% (95% C.I., 0.016% and 0.269%) for urea, 0.104% (95% C.I., – 0.008% and 0.235%) for AS, and 0.069% (95% C.I., – 0.036 and 0.194) for DAP. No significant differences in EF1 were observed between the three fertilisers (P > 0.05) at individual sites or when considering all four sites collectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research\",\"volume\":\"29 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2023.2277916\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2023.2277916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究测定了相同田间条件下,硫酸铵(as)、磷酸二铵(DAP)和尿素的氧化亚氮排放因子(EF1, N2O排放量占施氮量的百分比)。试验于2022年深秋和春季在新西兰的四个地点(怀卡托、马纳瓦图、坎特伯雷和奥塔哥)的牧场土壤上进行。4个试验点对尿素的平均EF1值在深秋为0.128% (95% ci、0.023%和0.249%),在春季为0.136% (95% ci、0.031%和0.259%)。AS在深秋和春季分别为0.125% (95% ci、- 0.021%和0.246%)和0.083% (95% ci、- 0.015%和0.197%),DAP在深秋分别为0.049% (95% ci、- 0.044%和0.157%)和0.090% (95% ci、-0.009%和0.205%)。尿素的平均EF1值为0.132% (95% c.i., 0.016%和0.269%),as为0.104% (95% c.i., - 0.008%和0.235%),DAP为0.069% (95% c.i., - 0.036和0.194)。3种肥料的EF1在个别地点或综合考虑4个地点均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nitrous oxide emission factors for fertiliser ammonium sulphate, diammonium phosphate, and urea
This study determined the nitrous oxide emission factors (EF1, the percentage of N2O emitted as a proportion of fertiliser N applied) for fertilisers ammonium sulphate (AS), diammonium phosphate (DAP), and urea under the same field conditions. Trials were conducted on pasture soils across four sites (Waikato, Manawatu, Canterbury and Otago) in New Zealand during late autumn and spring of 2022. The average EF1 values for urea across all four sites were 0.128% (95% C.I., 0.023% and 0.249%) in late autumn and 0.136% (95% C.I., 0.031% and 0.259%) in spring. The corresponding EF1 values for AS were 0.125% (95% C.I., – 0.021% and 0.246%) in late autumn and 0.083% (95% C.I., 0.015% and 0.197%) in spring, while for DAP, they were 0.049% (95% C.I., – 0.044% and 0.157%) in late autumn and 0.090% (95% C.I., -0.009% and 0.205%) in spring. The mean EF1 values across all four sites and two seasons were calculated as 0.132% (95% C.I., 0.016% and 0.269%) for urea, 0.104% (95% C.I., – 0.008% and 0.235%) for AS, and 0.069% (95% C.I., – 0.036 and 0.194) for DAP. No significant differences in EF1 were observed between the three fertilisers (P > 0.05) at individual sites or when considering all four sites collectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research publishes original research papers, review papers, short communications, book reviews, letters, and forum articles. We welcome submissions on all aspects of animal and pastoral science relevant to temperate and subtropical regions. The journal''s subject matter includes soil science, fertilisers, insect pests, plant pathology, weeds, forage crops, management systems, agricultural economics, agronomy, and animal science. The journal also accepts crossover papers on subjects such as land –water interactions.
期刊最新文献
Effect of feeding time and time of harvest of fresh pasture on urinary and faecal nitrogen excretion patterns in sheep A review of pasture mixes and management strategies to reduce the impact of facial eczema in New Zealand Fecundity and survival of flumetsulam-resistant and -susceptible Ranunculus acris plants with and without exposure to the herbicide Copaiba oleoresin as a substitute for sodium lasalocid in finishing diets for lambs: carcass characteristics and meat quality Variation in foliar inorganic phosphorus concentrations in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1