{"title":"非临床因素与公民满意度:提高卫生系统质量的途径","authors":"Ángel Fernández-Pérez, Ángeles Sánchez","doi":"10.1080/20479700.2023.2265685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTCitzens’ self-reported satisfaction is often employed to assess the quality of health services and systems and guide actions for improvement. Health providers and policymakers are increasingly interested in identifying factors that promote higher satisfaction with health systems. Using data from the Spanish Healthcare Barometer survey, this paper aims at analysing the relationship between non-clinical factors of responsiveness and overall satisfaction with the public Spanish National Health System. Specifically, the study examines whether better experiences with aspects such as doctor-patient communication, dignity, or prompt attention are relevant in improving overall satisfaction with the health system. Factors that contribute most to satisfaction are also identified. The methodology relies on probit-adapted ordinary least squares, a method that is increasingly employed in the most recent subjective well-being literature. The findings show that non-clinical factors are relevant in reporting higher overall satisfaction with the health system. Factors related to prompt attention and dignity contribute most to increasing satisfaction. As our readings suggest, this is the first study to present empirical evidence on the relevance of non-clinical factors of responsiveness in improving users’ experience with the whole Spanish health system. These results provide health policymakers with information to improve the quality of the system.KEYWORDS: Quality assessmentnon-clinical qualitypatient satisfactionprobit-adapted ordinary least squareshealth system performancehealth system responsiveness Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Agencia Estatal de Investigación: [Grant Number ECO2015-66553-R] and the Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences of the University of Granada.Notes on contributorsÁngel Fernández-PérezÁngel Fernández-Pérez holds a double PhD in Economics from the University of Granada, Spain, and the University of Insubria at Varese, Italy. He is Assistant Professor in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Granada. His main research is in the field of health economics, specifically health policy evaluation and health system performance. He is also interested in the economics of inequality.Ángeles SánchezAngeles Sánchez holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Granada, Spain. She is Associate Professor in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Granada. Her research interests focus on how public policies can contribute to increasing people’s well-being and reducing economic inequalities.","PeriodicalId":46911,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-clinical factors and citizens’ satisfaction: A way to improve the quality of health systems\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Fernández-Pérez, Ángeles Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20479700.2023.2265685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTCitzens’ self-reported satisfaction is often employed to assess the quality of health services and systems and guide actions for improvement. Health providers and policymakers are increasingly interested in identifying factors that promote higher satisfaction with health systems. Using data from the Spanish Healthcare Barometer survey, this paper aims at analysing the relationship between non-clinical factors of responsiveness and overall satisfaction with the public Spanish National Health System. Specifically, the study examines whether better experiences with aspects such as doctor-patient communication, dignity, or prompt attention are relevant in improving overall satisfaction with the health system. Factors that contribute most to satisfaction are also identified. The methodology relies on probit-adapted ordinary least squares, a method that is increasingly employed in the most recent subjective well-being literature. The findings show that non-clinical factors are relevant in reporting higher overall satisfaction with the health system. Factors related to prompt attention and dignity contribute most to increasing satisfaction. As our readings suggest, this is the first study to present empirical evidence on the relevance of non-clinical factors of responsiveness in improving users’ experience with the whole Spanish health system. These results provide health policymakers with information to improve the quality of the system.KEYWORDS: Quality assessmentnon-clinical qualitypatient satisfactionprobit-adapted ordinary least squareshealth system performancehealth system responsiveness Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Agencia Estatal de Investigación: [Grant Number ECO2015-66553-R] and the Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences of the University of Granada.Notes on contributorsÁngel Fernández-PérezÁngel Fernández-Pérez holds a double PhD in Economics from the University of Granada, Spain, and the University of Insubria at Varese, Italy. He is Assistant Professor in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Granada. His main research is in the field of health economics, specifically health policy evaluation and health system performance. He is also interested in the economics of inequality.Ángeles SánchezAngeles Sánchez holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Granada, Spain. She is Associate Professor in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Granada. Her research interests focus on how public policies can contribute to increasing people’s well-being and reducing economic inequalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2023.2265685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2023.2265685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要公民自我报告的满意度经常被用来评估卫生服务和系统的质量,并指导改进行动。卫生服务提供者和政策制定者越来越有兴趣确定促进对卫生系统更高满意度的因素。使用来自西班牙医疗晴雨表调查的数据,本文旨在分析非临床因素的反应性和西班牙公共国家卫生系统的总体满意度之间的关系。具体而言,该研究考察了医患沟通、尊严或及时关注等方面的更好体验是否与提高对卫生系统的总体满意度有关。还确定了对满意度贡献最大的因素。该方法依赖于概率适应的普通最小二乘,这种方法在最近的主观幸福感文献中越来越多地被采用。研究结果表明,非临床因素与报告较高的卫生系统总体满意度有关。与及时关注和尊严有关的因素对提高满意度贡献最大。正如我们的阅读资料所表明的,这是第一个提出非临床因素在改善整个西班牙卫生系统用户体验中的响应性相关性的经验证据的研究。这些结果为卫生政策制定者提供了提高系统质量的信息。关键词:质量评估;非临床质量;患者满意度;概率适应普通最小二乘卫生系统绩效;本研究得到了agcia Estatal de Investigación的资助:[资助号ECO2015-66553-R]和格拉纳达大学经济与商业科学学院的支持。他拥有西班牙格拉纳达大学和意大利瓦雷塞因苏布里亚大学的经济学双博士学位。他是格拉纳达大学应用经济系的助理教授。他的主要研究领域是卫生经济学,特别是卫生政策评估和卫生系统绩效。他还对不平等的经济学感兴趣。Ángeles SánchezAngeles Sánchez,西班牙格拉纳达大学经济学博士。她是格拉纳达大学应用经济系副教授。她的研究兴趣集中在公共政策如何有助于提高人们的福祉和减少经济不平等。
Non-clinical factors and citizens’ satisfaction: A way to improve the quality of health systems
ABSTRACTCitzens’ self-reported satisfaction is often employed to assess the quality of health services and systems and guide actions for improvement. Health providers and policymakers are increasingly interested in identifying factors that promote higher satisfaction with health systems. Using data from the Spanish Healthcare Barometer survey, this paper aims at analysing the relationship between non-clinical factors of responsiveness and overall satisfaction with the public Spanish National Health System. Specifically, the study examines whether better experiences with aspects such as doctor-patient communication, dignity, or prompt attention are relevant in improving overall satisfaction with the health system. Factors that contribute most to satisfaction are also identified. The methodology relies on probit-adapted ordinary least squares, a method that is increasingly employed in the most recent subjective well-being literature. The findings show that non-clinical factors are relevant in reporting higher overall satisfaction with the health system. Factors related to prompt attention and dignity contribute most to increasing satisfaction. As our readings suggest, this is the first study to present empirical evidence on the relevance of non-clinical factors of responsiveness in improving users’ experience with the whole Spanish health system. These results provide health policymakers with information to improve the quality of the system.KEYWORDS: Quality assessmentnon-clinical qualitypatient satisfactionprobit-adapted ordinary least squareshealth system performancehealth system responsiveness Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Agencia Estatal de Investigación: [Grant Number ECO2015-66553-R] and the Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences of the University of Granada.Notes on contributorsÁngel Fernández-PérezÁngel Fernández-Pérez holds a double PhD in Economics from the University of Granada, Spain, and the University of Insubria at Varese, Italy. He is Assistant Professor in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Granada. His main research is in the field of health economics, specifically health policy evaluation and health system performance. He is also interested in the economics of inequality.Ángeles SánchezAngeles Sánchez holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Granada, Spain. She is Associate Professor in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Granada. Her research interests focus on how public policies can contribute to increasing people’s well-being and reducing economic inequalities.