提高儿童福利的保留率:对主管和个案工作者所需支持的比较

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1080/23303131.2023.2271045
Qi Zhou, Annette Semanchin Jones
{"title":"提高儿童福利的保留率:对主管和个案工作者所需支持的比较","authors":"Qi Zhou, Annette Semanchin Jones","doi":"10.1080/23303131.2023.2271045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSupervisor retention is important due to their critical role in child welfare; nevertheless, most research examining child welfare workforce retention has an explicit focus on caseworkers, with less attention to supervisors. This study examined the differences in work experiences between child welfare supervisors and caseworkers and the specific factors contributing to their retention, with a focus on various domains of support. Data were drawn from a large survey, the Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment (COHA), conducted by the National Child Welfare Workforce Institute (NCWWI). The findings revealed that child welfare supervisors and caseworkers had different work experiences. Supervisors were less satisfied with peer support and supervision than caseworkers. Supervisors and caseworkers had similar factors predicting their retention; however, job position was found to be a critical factor influencing their intent to stay.PRACTICE POINTS Position-related characteristics should be considered when designing strategies to improve workforce retention in child welfare.It is essential to provide supervisors with more consistent, evidence-informed supervision, aligning with their high-demand job requirements.Facilitating communication at all levels and increasing networking among workers would strengthen peer support and then encourage supervisors to stay.KEYWORDS: Child welfarepeer supportsupervisionsupervisorworkforce retention Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":46043,"journal":{"name":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Retention in Child Welfare: Comparing Needed Support for Supervisors and Caseworkers\",\"authors\":\"Qi Zhou, Annette Semanchin Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23303131.2023.2271045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTSupervisor retention is important due to their critical role in child welfare; nevertheless, most research examining child welfare workforce retention has an explicit focus on caseworkers, with less attention to supervisors. This study examined the differences in work experiences between child welfare supervisors and caseworkers and the specific factors contributing to their retention, with a focus on various domains of support. Data were drawn from a large survey, the Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment (COHA), conducted by the National Child Welfare Workforce Institute (NCWWI). The findings revealed that child welfare supervisors and caseworkers had different work experiences. Supervisors were less satisfied with peer support and supervision than caseworkers. Supervisors and caseworkers had similar factors predicting their retention; however, job position was found to be a critical factor influencing their intent to stay.PRACTICE POINTS Position-related characteristics should be considered when designing strategies to improve workforce retention in child welfare.It is essential to provide supervisors with more consistent, evidence-informed supervision, aligning with their high-demand job requirements.Facilitating communication at all levels and increasing networking among workers would strengthen peer support and then encourage supervisors to stay.KEYWORDS: Child welfarepeer supportsupervisionsupervisorworkforce retention Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2023.2271045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2023.2271045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要督导人员在儿童福利中起着至关重要的作用;然而,大多数检查儿童福利劳动力保留的研究都明确关注社会工作者,而较少关注监督者。本研究考察了儿童福利监督员和个案工作者在工作经验上的差异,以及影响他们留任的具体因素,重点关注了不同领域的支持。数据来自一项大型调查,即国家儿童福利劳动力研究所(NCWWI)进行的综合组织健康评估(COHA)。调查结果显示,儿童福利监督员和个案工作者的工作经验不同。主管对同伴支持和监督的满意度低于个案工作者。主管和个案工作者有相似的因素预测他们的留任;然而,研究发现,工作职位是影响他们留下意愿的关键因素。实践要点:在设计提高儿童福利工作人员保留率的策略时,应考虑与职位相关的特征。为监管人员提供更加一致的、基于证据的监管,与他们高要求的工作要求保持一致,这一点至关重要。促进各级员工之间的沟通,增加员工之间的联系,将加强同事之间的支持,从而鼓励主管留任。关键词:儿童福利同伴支持监管监管人员劳动力保留披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving Retention in Child Welfare: Comparing Needed Support for Supervisors and Caseworkers
ABSTRACTSupervisor retention is important due to their critical role in child welfare; nevertheless, most research examining child welfare workforce retention has an explicit focus on caseworkers, with less attention to supervisors. This study examined the differences in work experiences between child welfare supervisors and caseworkers and the specific factors contributing to their retention, with a focus on various domains of support. Data were drawn from a large survey, the Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment (COHA), conducted by the National Child Welfare Workforce Institute (NCWWI). The findings revealed that child welfare supervisors and caseworkers had different work experiences. Supervisors were less satisfied with peer support and supervision than caseworkers. Supervisors and caseworkers had similar factors predicting their retention; however, job position was found to be a critical factor influencing their intent to stay.PRACTICE POINTS Position-related characteristics should be considered when designing strategies to improve workforce retention in child welfare.It is essential to provide supervisors with more consistent, evidence-informed supervision, aligning with their high-demand job requirements.Facilitating communication at all levels and increasing networking among workers would strengthen peer support and then encourage supervisors to stay.KEYWORDS: Child welfarepeer supportsupervisionsupervisorworkforce retention Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Calling All Leaders Challenges and Strategies in Carrying Out Scholarly and Research Projects Evaluating the Early Implementation of a Resilience Intervention Addressing Secondary Traumatic Stress in Child Welfare Workers Innovative Approaches to Social Activation Using Collaborative Social Work Concepts: The Case of Social Enterprise in Working with the Vulnerable Long-Term Unemployed A (Dis)orderly Progression: The Lasting Impact of Pandemic on Community-Based Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1